Advertisement
A Deep Dive into "A Person Paper on Purity in Language": Exploring Historical Context and Modern Relevance
Author: Dr. Evelyn Reed, Professor of Linguistics and Sociolinguistics at the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Reed has spent over two decades researching language evolution, the social construction of meaning, and the impact of prescriptivism on linguistic diversity. Her expertise makes her uniquely qualified to analyze "a person paper on purity in language," a concept she has extensively studied in relation to power dynamics and social inequality.
Keyword: "A person paper on purity in language"
Introduction:
The elusive concept of "a person paper on purity in language" encapsulates a fascinating and often contentious area of linguistic study. This phrase, while seemingly paradoxical, highlights the deeply personal and subjective nature of views on language "purity." It challenges the very notion of objective linguistic standards and raises questions about the social and political forces that shape perceptions of correct and incorrect language use. This analysis will explore the historical roots of this concept, its evolving manifestations in contemporary society, and the ongoing debate surrounding its relevance.
H1: Historical Context: Tracing the Roots of Linguistic Purity
The idea of a "pure" language, free from outside influence, has deep historical roots. Often intertwined with notions of national identity and cultural superiority, the pursuit of linguistic purity has been a driving force behind language standardization efforts and prescriptive grammars throughout history. The rise of nation-states in Europe, for example, saw concerted efforts to codify national languages, often at the expense of regional dialects and minority languages. This often manifested as a rejection of perceived "impurities," such as borrowings from other languages or grammatical structures deemed "incorrect" by the dominant group. "A person paper on purity in language" would reflect this history, showing how individual biases intersect with larger societal pressures to create a vision of linguistic ideal.
The 18th and 19th centuries witnessed a flourishing of prescriptive grammar, often fueled by anxieties about the perceived decline of language and the erosion of social order. These prescriptive grammarians actively sought to establish and enforce rules of "correct" usage, contributing to the ongoing debate about linguistic purity. Their influence extended beyond the academic sphere, shaping public perceptions of language and influencing educational practices. Understanding this historical context is crucial to analyzing "a person paper on purity in language" because it illuminates the social and political forces behind individual beliefs about linguistic correctness.
H2: The Modern Manifestation: "A Person Paper on Purity in Language" in the 21st Century
In the 21st century, "a person paper on purity in language" takes on new dimensions. While overt attempts at linguistic purification may be less common, the underlying anxieties remain. The rise of internet communication and globalization has created a linguistic landscape of unprecedented diversity and fluidity. This has sparked new debates about language standardization, code-switching, and the acceptability of various linguistic forms.
The concept of "a person paper on purity in language" is particularly relevant in the context of language planning and policy. Governments and institutions often face the challenge of balancing competing linguistic claims and promoting linguistic equality. These decisions are often informed by ideologies and beliefs about linguistic purity. The rise of politically charged discussions about language use, including concerns about political correctness and linguistic appropriation, underscore the ongoing relevance of this concept. Analyzing "a person paper on purity in language" compels us to consider the individual biases and societal pressures that shape language policy.
H3: Challenging the Notion of Purity: A Sociolinguistic Perspective
A critical analysis of "a person paper on purity in language" necessitates a sociolinguistic lens. Sociolinguistics demonstrates that language is not a static entity but a dynamic system constantly evolving and adapting to social contexts. The idea of a pure language, free from external influences, is therefore a myth. All languages borrow words and grammatical structures from other languages, enriching their lexicon and grammar.
Furthermore, language variation is intrinsic to language itself. Different social groups, regions, and individuals use language in diverse ways, reflecting their unique identities and experiences. Attempts to impose a single standard of "pure" language often lead to the marginalization of minority languages and dialects, perpetuating social inequalities. "A person paper on purity in language," therefore, should be viewed as a reflection of subjective values and power dynamics rather than an objective assessment of linguistic quality.
H4: Current Relevance and Conclusion
The concept of "a person paper on purity in language" remains remarkably relevant in the 21st century. It serves as a powerful reminder of the subjective and socially constructed nature of linguistic standards. Understanding the historical context and sociolinguistic implications of this concept allows for a more nuanced and critical analysis of language use and language policy. It encourages us to challenge the often-unquestioned assumptions about linguistic correctness and to appreciate the richness and diversity of human language. The enduring debate surrounding "a person paper on purity in language" highlights the need for ongoing critical reflection on the social and political dimensions of language.
Publisher: Oxford University Press. Oxford University Press is a globally recognized academic publisher with a long-standing reputation for publishing high-quality research in linguistics and related fields. Their expertise and rigorous peer-review process lend considerable credibility to any publication they release on such topics as “a person paper on purity in language.”
Editor: Dr. Liam O'Connell, a renowned scholar of sociolinguistics and language policy with extensive experience editing academic journals in the field. His expertise guarantees a high standard of scholarship and rigorous analysis within the published article.
Summary:
This analysis of "a person paper on purity in language" reveals a complex interplay of historical context, social forces, and individual perspectives. The pursuit of linguistic purity is often linked to national identity and social hierarchies, but a sociolinguistic approach reveals the inherent myth of a "pure" language. The concept remains relevant in contemporary society, impacting language planning, language education, and public perceptions of linguistic correctness. Understanding this complex interplay is crucial for fostering linguistic inclusivity and promoting language equality.
FAQs:
1. What is the difference between descriptive and prescriptive linguistics in the context of "a person paper on purity in language"? Descriptive linguistics focuses on observing and documenting language use without imposing value judgments, while prescriptive linguistics seeks to dictate "correct" usage, often reflecting biases related to "purity."
2. How does power dynamics influence perceptions of linguistic purity? Dominant groups often impose their linguistic norms as standards, marginalizing other linguistic forms and reinforcing social inequalities.
3. What role does language standardization play in the concept of "a person paper on purity in language"? Language standardization efforts, while aiming for consistency, can inadvertently marginalize dialects and variations deemed "impure."
4. How does globalization impact the concept of linguistic purity? Globalization leads to increased linguistic contact, challenging traditional notions of linguistic boundaries and "pure" forms.
5. What are the ethical implications of enforcing linguistic purity? Enforcing linguistic purity can lead to the suppression of minority languages and dialects, violating linguistic rights and promoting social inequality.
6. How does "a person paper on purity in language" relate to concepts of linguistic appropriation? The concept highlights how individual perspectives on linguistic purity can be used to justify claims of appropriation and control over language use.
7. What is the role of education in shaping individual perceptions of linguistic purity? Educational systems often transmit prescriptive norms, influencing individuals' understanding of "correct" and "incorrect" language use.
8. Can the pursuit of linguistic purity ever be justified? The pursuit of linguistic purity is rarely justifiable, as it often leads to marginalization and the suppression of linguistic diversity.
9. How can we promote linguistic inclusivity in the face of persistent anxieties about "purity"? Promoting linguistic inclusivity requires challenging prescriptive norms, celebrating linguistic diversity, and fostering respect for all linguistic forms.
Related Articles:
1. "Language Ideologies and Linguistic Diversity": Explores the relationship between societal beliefs about language and the maintenance of linguistic diversity.
2. "The Social Construction of Grammaticality": Examines how societal values and power relations shape perceptions of grammatical correctness.
3. "Language Contact and Linguistic Change": Analyzes the impact of language contact on linguistic evolution, challenging the notion of "pure" languages.
4. "Language Planning and Policy in Multilingual Societies": Discusses the complexities of language planning in societies with multiple languages, highlighting the tensions between standardization and linguistic diversity.
5. "The Politics of Correctness: Language and Social Justice": Examines the political dimensions of language use and the impact of language ideologies on social justice issues.
6. "The History of Prescriptive Grammar": Traces the development of prescriptive grammar and its influence on language attitudes and beliefs.
7. "Language Attitudes and Linguistic Prejudice": Explores the relationship between language attitudes and prejudice against speakers of minority languages.
8. "Code-Switching and Language Identity": Examines the use of code-switching as a way of expressing linguistic and cultural identity.
9. "Diglossia and Language Maintenance": Discusses the phenomenon of diglossia and its impact on the maintenance of minority languages.
| a person paper on purity in language: The Feminist Critique of Language Deborah Cameron, 1998 First Published in 1998. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Language: The Basics R.L. Trask, 2003-09-02 What makes human language unique? Do women speak differently from men? Just what is the meaning of meaning? Language: The Basics provides a concise introduction to the study of language. Written in an engaging and entertaining style, it encourages the reader to think about the way language works. It features: * chapters on 'Language in Use', 'Attitudes to Language', 'Children and Language' and 'Language, Mind and Brain' * a section on sign language * a glossary of key terms * handy annotated guides to further reading. Providing an accessible overview of a fascinating subject, this is an essential book for all students and anyone who's ever been accused of splitting an infinitive. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Key Concepts in Language and Linguistics R. L. Trask, Robert Lawrence Trask, 1999 A comprehensive critical work, Key Concepts in Language and Linguistics is a highly readable A-Z guide to the main terms and concepts used in the study of language and linguistics. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Language and Linguistics: The Key Concepts R.L. Trask, 2007-08-07 The fully updated second edition of this critical work includes a new introduction, a wide range of new entries and added specialised further reading for lecturers and more advanced students. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Feminist Fieldwork Analysis Sherryl Kleinman, 2007-04-20 Feminist Fieldwork Analysis teaches researchers how to think in terms of the feminist perspective and how to translate their research into feminist practice and analysis. This tricks of the trade guide gives researchers the principles for doing qualitative work, examples of solid feminist studies, and analytic questions to help identify feminist issues while in the field or at the desk. These issues aren't just about gender. Rather, they are about inequality. Feminist research sheds light on inequality so that people can undo it. Author Sherryl Kleinman offers angles for feminist analysis, or the things to keep in mind when doing fieldwork and developing an analysis. Key Features: Gives researchers five principles for doing, qualitative work and research: Each chapter provides a guiding feminist principle (which corresponds with the chapter title): Talk Is Action, Similarities Can Be Deceiving, Sexism Can Be Anywhere, The Personal Is Political, and Everything Is More Than One Thing. Contains real world examples of feminist fieldwork analysis: Engaging examples illustrate the principles as feminist researchers apply their findings to their everyday lives. Poses questions to bring to any feminist qualitative project: Kleinman incorporates analytical questions at the end of each chapter that encourage researchers to think about what to ask, where to look, and how to make sense of what they've seen and heard. Covers the entire research process: The principles and questions found in this book can be used at any stage of the research process, including choosing a setting, analyzing an observation, and writing a report. Helps researchers interpret data in new ways: By applying what they find in this book, researchers see things in the field they would not have noticed otherwise, or they might see connections between pieces of data that previously appeared unrelated. Book jacket. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Research Handbook on the Ombudsman Marc Hertogh, Richard Kirkham, 2018-11-30 The public sector ombudsman has become one of the most important administrative justice institutions in many countries around the world. This international and interdisciplinary Research Handbook brings together leading scholars and practitioners to discuss the state-of-the-art of ombudsman research. It uses new empirical studies and competing theoretical explanations to critically examine important aspects of the ombudsman’s work. This comprehensive Handbook is of value to academics designing future ombudsman studies and practitioners and policymakers in understanding the future challenges of the ombudsman. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Metamagical Themas Douglas R Hofstadter, 2008-08-04 Hofstadter's collection of quirky essays is unified by its primary concern: to examine the way people perceive and think. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Language Change Larry Trask, 2013-06-17 In Language Change , R. L. Trask uses data from English and other languages to introduce the concepts central to language change. Language Change: covers the most frequent types of language change and how languages are born and die uses data-based exercises to show how languages change looks at other key areas such as attitudes to language change, and the consequences of changing language. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Feminism and Linguistic Theory Deborah Cameron, 1992-09-30 An introduction to theories about language in attempts to understand and transform women's lives. This evolving body of work encompasses linguistics, anthropology, literary and cultural theory, psychoanalysis and postmodern philosophy. |
| a person paper on purity in language: The Routledge Handbook of Social and Political Philosophy of Language Justin Khoo, Rachel Katharine Sterken, 2021-04-21 This Handbook brings together philosophical work on how language shapes, and is shaped by, social and political factors. Its 24 chapters were written exclusively for this volume by an international team of leading researchers, and together they provide a broad expert introduction to the major issues currently under discussion in this area. The volume is divided into four parts: Part I: Methodological and Foundational Issues Part II: Non-ideal Semantics and Pragmatics Part III: Linguistic Harms Part IV: Applications The parts, and chapters in each part, are introduced in the volume’s General Introduction. A list of Works Cited concludes each chapter, pointing readers to further areas of study. The Handbook is the first major, multi-authored reference work in this growing area and essential reading for anyone interested in the nature of language and its relationship to social and political reality. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Person Reference and Gender in Translation Marion Kremer, 1997 |
| a person paper on purity in language: Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy Adrian Blackledge, Angela Creese, 2013-12-17 This volume presents evidence about how we understand communication in changing times, and proposes that such understandings may contribute to the development of pedagogy for teaching and learning. It expands current debates on multilingualism, asking which signs are in use and in action, and what are their social, political, and historical implications. The volume’s starting-point is Bakhtin’s ‘heteroglossia’, a key concept in understanding the tensions, conflicts, and multiple voices within, among, and between those signs. The chapters provide illuminating accounts of language practices as they bring into play, both in practice and in pedagogy, voices which index students’ localities, social histories, circumstances, and identities. The book documents the performance of linguistic repertoires in an era of profound social change caused by the shifting nature of nation-states, increased movement of people across territories, and growing digital communication. “Our thinking on language and multilingualism is expanding rapidly. Up until recently we have tended to regard languages as bounded entities, and multilingualism has been understood as knowing more than one language. Working with the concept of heteroglossia, researchers are developing alternative perspectives that treat languages as sets of resources for expressing meaning that can be drawn on by speakers in communicatively productive ways in different contexts. These perspectives raise fundamental questions about the myriad of ways of knowing and using language(s). This collection brings together the contributions of many of the key researchers in the field. It will provide an authoritative reference point for contemporary interpretations of ‘heteroglossia’ and valuable accounts of how ‘translanguaging’ can be explored and exploited in the fields of education and cultural studies.” Professor Constant Leung, King’s College London, UK. From rap and hip hop to taxi cabs, and from classrooms to interactive online learning environments, each of the chapters in this volume written by well-known and up-and-coming scholars provide fascinating accounts drawing on a wide diversity of rich descriptive data collected in heteroglossic contexts around the globe. Creese and Blackledge have brought together a compelling collection that builds upon and expands Bakhtin’s construct of heteroglossia. These scholars help to move the field away from the view of languages as separate bounded system by providing detailed examples and expert analyses of the ways bilinguals and multilinguals draw upon their linguistic repertoires for effective and meaningful communication. Wayne E. Wright, University of Texas at San Antonio, USA. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Language Change R. L. Trask, Robert Lawrence Trask, 1994 First Published in 1994. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company. |
| a person paper on purity in language: The Invention of Women Oyèrónkẹ́ Oyěwùmí, 1997 The author traces the misapplication of Western, body-oriented concepts of gender through the history of gender discourses in Yoruba studies. THE INVENTION OF WOMEN demonstrates that biology as a rationale for organizing the social world is a Western construction not applicable in Yoruban culture where social organization was determined by relative age. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Gender Equity Right From the Start Jo Sanders, Janice Koch, Josephine Urso, 2013-12-16 What makes girls avoid math, science, and technology in school? And what can teacher educators do to help new teachers keep this from happening so that all of our children's talents can find expression? These two volumes provide teaching materials and background information on gender equity for teacher educators in mathematics, science, and technology education and their students. A practical guide, Gender Equity Right from the Start is usable by professors of education for preservice teachers and by staff developers for in-service teachers. By adapting the material for other subjects, it can also be used by teacher educators in content areas other than math, science, and technology. It consists of two volumes: Instructional Activities for Teacher Educators in Mathematics, Science, and Technology contains some 200 teaching activities on the major issues in gender equity, emphasizing solutions and not just problems. Activities take place in out-of-class assignments and field experiences whenever possible to minimize demands on class time. Sources and Resources for Education Students in Mathematics, Science, and Technology contains student materials needed for the activities as well as extensive print, electronic, organizational, and other resources for further information. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Gender Equity Right from the Start: Instructional activities for teacher educators in mathematics, science, and technology Jo Shuchat Sanders, Janice Koch, Josephine Urso, 1997 For instructors--contains general info about gender equity in math, science, and technology education, teaching activities, learning assessment materials, and suggestions for action research projects to be done by students. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Gender on Campus Sharon Gmelch, 1998 Gender on Campus is the first book to combine solid analyses of the broad range of gender issues for women in college with realistic approaches to heighten awareness and alleviate problems. Written for students, the book first clarifies the concept of feminism and then examines gender dynamics in a variety of settings and contexts-from the classroom to the sports field and from language to social life. Sharon Gmelch probes sexism, racism, and homophobia on campus and surveys the special issues facing diverse women students. The book also addresses issues relating to body image and sexuality. Its final chapters analyze the role gender continues to play after college-in the media, workplace, and politics. After a thorough discussion of a topic, each chapter concludes with possibilities for action (What You Can Do) as well as a selected bibliography of books, videos, and organizations that students can consult. Gender on Campus is an invaluable resource for students, parents, and administrators, as well as an excellent text for women's studies courses. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Conversations Jack Selzer, Dominic Delli Carpini, 2005-04 With more than 130 readings and 24 pages of visual arguments, Conversations offers an extraordinary variety of authors, genres, voices, and viewpoints on important contemporary civic issues. Touching on issues that affect students both as individuals and as citizens, the readings and visuals invite students to join important civic conversations through their own writing. For each issue addressed, Conversations offers not just one or two selections, but several--reminding students that no issue has just one or two sides, but usually involves a wide range of voices. Frequently, selections comment on and argue with other selections, demonstrating that writing is a social exchange, and that much writing is a response to what we read. The images included in this new edition also remind students that we regularly read--interpret and respond to--not only words, but visual arguments found in photographs, artworks, cartoons, advertisements, and websites. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Travellers in Magic Lisa Goldstein, 2014-10-21 Fifteen stories of ordinary lives that take fantastic turns Robert never quite feels at home with Cassie’s family, a gang of eccentrics including a reptile smuggler, a worshipper of Osiris, and an old woman who believes her photographs can see into the future. When he breaks up with Cassie, she is so upset that she gives him the most terrible thing she can offer: an envelope of her grandmother’s photos, which show in detail the path that Robert’s life will take. At first, this vision of the future gives him strength—but soon it becomes a prison on glossy paper. A Nebula and Hugo Award finalist, “Cassandra’s Photographs” demonstrates all the power of Lisa Goldstein’s imagination. Whether she is writing about shape-shifting aliens or kind-hearted ghosts, Goldstein’s fantasies remain grounded in reality, supported by the kind of crystalline prose that takes a lifetime to master. This collection also includes the Nebula Award finalist “Alfred.” |
| a person paper on purity in language: The International Journal of African Studies , 1997 |
| a person paper on purity in language: Conversations , 1990 |
| a person paper on purity in language: Intersections Steven D. (Steven Douglas) Scott, Don Perkins, Erika Rothwell, 1999 |
| a person paper on purity in language: Second Thoughts Wanda Teays, 1996 A complete introduction to critical thinking that places an emphasis on multi-cultural issues and the media. It includes examples, exercises and applications of particular interest to women and coloured people. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Talking About People Rosalie Maggio, 1997-10-09 Anyone who works with words and people will want to keep this indispensable guide close at hand. The author offers thousands of alternatives for outdated, stereotypical, and damaging language. This substantially updated and expanded version, also covers numerous words and phrases that were not even part of our language five years ago. This handy reference guide merits a place next to the dictionary and thesaurus of all who are sensitive to the use of fair and accurate language. It will help them make an informed judgment when choosing words to describe people in terms of their age, sex, employment, economic status, religion, lifestyle, ethnic background, or disability. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Rigging the Game Michael Schwalbe, 2008 In Rigging the Game--a brief, accessible introduction to the study of inequality in American society--Michael Schwalbe investigates how inequality is both created and reproduced. Guided by the questions How did the situation get this way? and How does it stay this way?, Schwalbe tracks inequality from its roots to its regulation. In the final chapter, Escaping the Inequality Trap, he also shows how inequality can be overcome. Throughout, Schwalbe's engaging writing style draws students into the material, providing instructors with a solid foundation for discussing this challenging and provocative subject. With its lively combination of incisive analysis and compelling fictional narratives, Rigging the Game is an innovative teaching tool--not only for courses on stratification, but also for social problems courses, introductory sociology courses, and any course that takes a close look at how the inequalities of race, class, and gender are perpetuated. |
| a person paper on purity in language: A Complete Dictionary of the English and German and English Languages , 1838 |
| a person paper on purity in language: The Production of Reality Jodi O'Brien, 1997 |
| a person paper on purity in language: Law & Inequality , 1998 |
| a person paper on purity in language: The Production of Reality Peter Kollock, Jodi O'Brien, 1994 |
| a person paper on purity in language: Feminism and Territoriality Susanne Hagemann, 2005 |
| a person paper on purity in language: Our Language Frederik Atherton Fernald, 1894 |
| a person paper on purity in language: Our Language , 1894 |
| a person paper on purity in language: Law Library Journal , 1986 Vols. 1- include Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Association of Law Libraries. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Recherches Anglaises Et Nord-américaines , 1998 |
| a person paper on purity in language: Purity and Worldview in the Epistle of James Darian Lockett, 2008-03-20 Arguing against restricting the meaning of purity language to the individual moral sphere (as many commentaries do), the central argument of Purity and Worldview in the Epistle of James is that purity language both articulates and constructs the worldview in James's epistle. Lockett offers a taxonomy of purity language, applied as a heuristic guide to understand the function of purity and pollution in the epistle. Through this analysis the study concludes that James is not calling for sectarian separation, but rather demonstrates a degree of cultural accommodation while calling forth specific socio-cultural boundaries between the readers and the world. |
| a person paper on purity in language: A Dictionary of the English Language ... Noah Webster, William Greenleaf Webster, William Adolphus Wheeler, 1878 |
| a person paper on purity in language: An American Dictionary of the English Language Noah Webster, 1849 |
| a person paper on purity in language: An American Dictionary of the English Language ...; to which is prefixed an introductory dissertation on the origin, history and connection of the languages of Western Asia and Europe ... Noah Webster, 1890 |
| a person paper on purity in language: Encyclopedia of Women's Folklore and Folklife: M-Z Liz Locke, Theresa A. Vaughan, Pauline Greenhill, 2009 Topics covered include: Abortion; Banshee; Barbie Doll; Best Friend; Cinderella; Courtship; Cowgirl; Cyber culture; Erotic Folklore; Folk Photography; Glass Ceiling; Hair; Hip Hop Culture/Rap; Lesbian and Queer Studies; Marriage; Menstruation; Muslim Women's Folklore; Photocopy Lore; Quilt making; and many more. In addition, there are entries on women's folklore and folklife in 15 regions of the world, such as the Caribbean, Central Asia, the Middle East, and Western Europe. Entries provide cross-references and cite works for further reading, and the encyclopedia closes with a selected bibliography of print and electronic resources. Students learning about history, world cultures, religion and spirituality, healing and traditional medicine, and literature will welcome this companion to the daily life of women across time and continents. FEATURES AND BENEFITS: 4 substantial overview essays survey the present state of scholarship on women's folklore and folklife around the world. |
| a person paper on purity in language: Annual Meeting of the National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges (U.S.). Meeting, 1993 |
PERSON Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
The meaning of PERSON is human, individual —sometimes used in combination especially by those who prefer to avoid man in compounds applicable to both sexes. How to use person in a …
Person - Wikipedia
A person (pl.: people or persons, depending on context) is a being who has certain capacities or attributes such as reason, morality, consciousness or self-consciousness, and being a part of …
PERSON | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary
PERSON meaning: 1. a man, woman, or child: 2. used when describing someone's character: 3. If you do something or…. Learn more.
PERSON definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
person is the most general and common word: the average person. individual views a person as standing alone or as a single member of a group: the characteristics of the individual; its …
Person - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms | Vocabulary.com
A human being is called a person, and while this applies to an actual individual, it also, in grammar, means the type of person — first person being "I/me," second person being "you," …
Person - definition of person by The Free Dictionary
Define person. person synonyms, person pronunciation, person translation, English dictionary definition of person. n. 1. A living human. Often used in combination: chairperson; …
person, n. meanings, etymology and more | Oxford English …
There are 21 meanings listed in OED's entry for the noun person, one of which is labelled obsolete. See ‘Meaning & use’ for definitions, usage, and quotation evidence.
Person Definition & Meaning - YourDictionary
Origin of Person From Anglo-Norman parsone , persoun et al. (Old French persone (“human being" ), French personne ), and its source Latin persōna (“mask used by actor; role, part, …
What does person mean? - Definitions.net
Definition of person in the Definitions.net dictionary. Meaning of person. What does person mean? Information and translations of person in the most comprehensive dictionary definitions …
person noun - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes ...
The first person (I/we) refers to the person(s) speaking; the second person (you) refers to the person(s) spoken to; the third person (he/she/it/they) refers to the person(s) or thing(s) spoken …
PERSON Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
The meaning of PERSON is human, individual —sometimes used in combination especially by those who prefer to avoid man in compounds applicable to both sexes. How to use person in a sentence.
Person - Wikipedia
A person (pl.: people or persons, depending on context) is a being who has certain capacities or attributes such as reason, morality, consciousness or self-consciousness, and being a part of a …
PERSON | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary
PERSON meaning: 1. a man, woman, or child: 2. used when describing someone's character: 3. If you do something or…. Learn more.
PERSON definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
person is the most general and common word: the average person. individual views a person as standing alone or as a single member of a group: the characteristics of the individual; its …
Person - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms | Vocabulary.com
A human being is called a person, and while this applies to an actual individual, it also, in grammar, means the type of person — first person being "I/me," second person being "you," and third …
Person - definition of person by The Free Dictionary
Define person. person synonyms, person pronunciation, person translation, English dictionary definition of person. n. 1. A living human. Often used in combination: chairperson; salesperson. …
person, n. meanings, etymology and more | Oxford English Dictionary
There are 21 meanings listed in OED's entry for the noun person, one of which is labelled obsolete. See ‘Meaning & use’ for definitions, usage, and quotation evidence.
Person Definition & Meaning - YourDictionary
Origin of Person From Anglo-Norman parsone , persoun et al. (Old French persone (“human being" ), French personne ), and its source Latin persōna (“mask used by actor; role, part, character" …
What does person mean? - Definitions.net
Definition of person in the Definitions.net dictionary. Meaning of person. What does person mean? Information and translations of person in the most comprehensive dictionary definitions resource …
person noun - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes ...
The first person (I/we) refers to the person(s) speaking; the second person (you) refers to the person(s) spoken to; the third person (he/she/it/they) refers to the person(s) or thing(s) spoken …
