Advertisement
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Comparative Studies in Special Education Kas Mazurek, Margret A. Winzer, 1994 This unequaled, all-encompassing collection of international programs on special education will enable educators worldwide to investigate special education practice within its social context to enhance their own initiatives with new ideas.Comparative Studies divides into five sections, each with an introduction to the chapters within. This thorough text begins with limited special education in such venues as South Africa, and Senegal. Section Two addresses emerging special education in Nigeria, Brazil, and several other locales. Segregated special education in Japan, Russia, and other countries makes up Section Three, and Section Four explores countries that are approaching integration, such as Poland and Australia. Integrated special education is described in Scandinavia, New Zealand, and other nations in the final section.More than 50 noted scholars have contributed to this important work, offering every involved student and practitioner an indispensable, detailed frame of reference in which to assess education programs worldwide for all special populations -- blind, deaf, physically and mentally disabled, and all others. |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Current Issues in School Leadership Larry W. Hughes, 2005-01-15 Current Issues in School Leadership examines controversies about, and affecting, school practices. Focusing on two essential questions--what is important to today's school leaders? and what is interfering with schooling processes?--it includes chapters by a broad range of authors, with expertise on their specific topic. The text is organized in three sections: *Social and Political Issues; *Curriculum and Learning Issues; and *Organization and Management Issues. The goal of this text--designed for school leadership, educational administration, and foundations of education courses--is to challenge readers to think carefully and critically about each of the issues presented, leading to positive action and leadership. |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Professional Preparation of High School Teachers Harry Lloyd Miller, 1919 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: The Disputants; Or, the Arguments in Favour of the Newly Established Theological Institution Among the Methodists, Brought to the Test ... By a Disciple of the Old School [J. Everett]. , 1835 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: The ... Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education , 1920 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Classroom Problems in the Education of Gifted Children Theodore Spafford Henry, 1917 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Special Reports on Educational Subjects Great Britain. Board of Education, 1902 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Inclusive Education Ann Cheryl Armstrong, Derrick Armstrong, Ilektra Spandagou, 2009-12-22 What does inclusion really mean and what impact have inclusive approaches to education had on practice? Bringing together issues of theory, research, policy and practice from both the countries of the South and the North, this ground-breaking book provides a critical discussion of recent developments in the field of inclusive education. The authors consider developments, both in current thinking about the meaning of inclusion and in terms of policies and practices, in the context of education systems across the world and their differences and inter-relatedness. Topics covered include the increasing pressure on educators to develop a global policy agenda for inclusive education, the individual needs of children, the illusion of inclusivity and the importance of local contexts in determining policy. The book's international perspective illuminates common successes, failures and concerns. With case studies from Europe, the Caribbean and Australasia, the book also features chapter summaries, questions to facilitate critical thinking and discussion, case studies and suggestions for further reading. An essential read for anyone studying inclusive education, special educational needs, disability studies, social policy and international and comparative education, this book will ignite debate and enable the reader to develop a deep understanding of the issues. Ann Cheryl Armstrong is the Director of the Division of Professional Learning, Derrick Armstrong is Acting Deputy Vice Chancellor (Education) and Professor of Education and Ilektra Spandagou is a Lecturer in Inclusive Education. They are all based at the University of Sydney, Australia. |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: The Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education National Society for the Study of Education, 1920 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: American Lutheran Survey , 1918 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: An Analysis of the Legal and Policy Arguments for the Inclusion of the Gifted-handicapped in Gifted Education Programs Mary Elizabeth Scott, 1999 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: The Educational Record Tasmania. Education Department, 1906 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education , 1920 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Stenographer and Phonographic World , 1901 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Hansard's Parliamentary Debates Great Britain. Parliament, 1880 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: What Really Works in Special and Inclusive Education David Mitchell, 2014-01-10 As teachers around the world deal with the challenges of inclusive education, they must find effective ways of enhancing their classroom teaching methods. What Really Works in Special and Inclusive Education presents teachers with a range of evidence-based strategies they can immediately put into practice in their classrooms. This unique book will be an invaluable resource for educators who may not have the time or the inclination to engage with theory-heavy research, but who wish to ensure that their teaching strategies are up-to-the-minute and proven to be the most effective best practices. Each of the 27 strategies that this book comprises has a substantial research base, a strong theoretical rationale and clear guidelines on their implementation, as well as cautionary advice where necessary. In this new second edition, David Mitchell, a leading writer in special and inclusive education, continues to break new ground with revised and updated strategies based on evidence from the most recent studies in the field. From the myriad of related research available, only those studies with genuine potential for improving the practices of teachers and schools have been included, with the aim of facilitating high-quality learning and social outcomes for all learners in schools. Updates to this new edition include: four new chapters, on response to intervention, universal design for learning, inter-agency cooperation and one on the Finnish education system over 350 new references an even wider international focus, including evidence drawn from Asia references to recent developments in neuroscience a new companion website, with extra case studies, links to further reading, journal articles and videos, and an interactive quiz, at www.routledge.com/cw/mitchell This book will be essential reading for anyone with a vocational or academic interest in evidence-based special educational needs teaching strategies, whether a student in initial teacher education or a qualified classroom teacher, teacher educator, educational psychologist, special needs coordinator, parent, consultant or researcher. David Mitchell is an Adjunct Professor in the College of Education, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, and a consultant in inclusive education. ‘This is the book I wish I had written, synthesizing an enormous literature focused on special needs students. It is robust, it is readable, and it is your right-hand resource. A stunner of a book.’ –Professor John Hattie, University of Melbourne, author of Visible Learning |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: The Journal of Proceedings and Addresses of the National Educational Association National Educational Association (U.S.), 1904 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Barriers to Inclusion Justin J. W. Powell, 2015-12-03 Barriers to Inclusion offers a comparative and historical account of the rise of special education over the twentieth century in the United States and Germany. This institutional analysis demonstrates how categorical boundaries, professional groups, social movements, and education and social policies shaped the schooling of children and youth with disabilities. It traces the evolution of special education classification, explores growing special education organizations, and examines students' learning opportunities and educational attainments. Highlighting cross-national differences over time, the author also investigates demographic and geographic variability within the federal democracies, especially in segregation and inclusion rates of disabled and disadvantaged children. Germany's elaborate system of segregated special school types contrasts with diverse American special education classrooms mainly within regular schools. Joining historical case studies with empirical indicators, this book reveals persistent barriers to school integration as well as factors that facilitate inclusive education reform in both societies. |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: The Abridgment United States. President, 1871 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Challenging Orthodoxy in Special Education Deborah J. Gallagher, 2004 Discusses some of the core philosophical concepts in special education. This title provides educators with tools to grasp the issues in special education for an inclusive, equitable, and democratic education for all students. It is of interest to professionals and students in special education, disability studies, and educational administration. |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Social Justice and Culturally-Affirming Education in K-12 Settings Chitiyo, Jonathan, Pietrantoni, Zachary, 2023-01-27 Social justice is a philosophy that has gathered momentum over the past few years to bring to light the inequities that exist within our society. In the field of education, social justice illuminates the challenges that marginalized students and minority students face compared to other students. Social Justice and Culturally-Affirming Education in K-12 Settings seeks to bring together social scientists, researchers, and other practitioners to delve into social justice issues in K-12 settings and considers the various challenges and future directions that are associated with this field. Covering key topics such as inclusive education, educational reform, and school policies, this reference work is ideal for administrators, policymakers, researchers, academicians, practitioners, scholars, instructors, and students. |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: The Law Journal , 1886 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Cobbett's Parliamentary Debates Great Britain. Parliament, 1903 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Report of the Annual Meeting British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1916 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Charity Organisation Reporter , 1879 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Redefining Tertiary Education OECD, 1998-10-07 Higher levels of participation at the tertiary level, driven strongly by demands reflecting the diverse interests of students, employers, and society are creating challenges to higher education. This book explores these challenges. |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: The Parliamentary Debates Great Britain. Parliament, 1903 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Supreme Court of the United States United States. Supreme Court, 1882 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: The truth of Christianity, an examination of the arguments. [2 issues]. William Harry Turton, 1900 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Queensland Parliamentary Debates Queensland. Parliament, 1873 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: The School World , 1918 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: The School Journal , 1908 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: New York School Journal , 1907 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Where to Find Out More about Education , 1980 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice Lisa Waddington, Anna Lawson, 2018 A timely examination of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, this first thorough comparative analysis contrasts the approaches of thirteen jurisdictions to reveal a legal area of growing importance. |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Principles of Secondary Education Willis Lemon Uhl, 1925 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Must Inclusion be Special? Jonathan Rix, 2015-06-05 Must Inclusion be Special? examines the discord between special and inclusive education and why this discord can only be resolved when wider inequalities within mainstream education are confronted. It calls for a shift in our approach to provision, from seeing it as a conglomeration of individualised needs to identifying it as a conglomeration of collective needs. The author examines the political, medical and cultural tendency of current times to focus upon the individual and contrasts this with the necessity to focus on context. This book distinguishes the theoretical perspectives that are often associated with special or inclusive education and the broad range of interests which depend upon their ongoing development. This examination leads to a problematisation of mainstream education provision, our understanding of why social inequities emerge and how additional support can overcome these inequities. Further chapters explore the underlying challenges which emerge from our use and understanding of the notions of special and inclusive, outlining an alternative approach based upon a community of provision. This approach recognises the interconnectedness of services and the significance of context, and it encapsulates the aspiration of much international legislation for participation and inclusion for all. But it also assumes that we tend towards diffuse practices, services, policies, settings and roles, spread across provision which is variously inclusive and exclusionary. In seeking to create equitable participation for all, support needs to shift its focus from the individual to this diffuse network of contexts. Must Inclusion be Special? emerges from the research base which problematises inclusion and special education, drawing upon examples from many countries. It also refers to the author’s research into pedagogy, language and policy, and his experiences as a teacher and the parent of a child identified with special educational needs. |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: The Educational Times, and Journal of the College of Preceptors , 1915 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Research bulletin , 1927 |
| arguments in favor of a specialized education: Report of the Annual Meeting British Association for the Advancement of Science. Meeting, 1916 |
50 Compelling Argumentative Essay Topics - ThoughtCo
50 Compelling Argumentative Essay Topics - ThoughtCo
United States v. Jones: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact
Jan 31, 2020 · Arguments . The government argued that vehicles access public streets regularly and are not subject to an expectation of privacy in the same way that a home is. Attorneys …
Obergefell v. Hodges: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impacts
Nov 19, 2019 · Arguments Attorneys on behalf of the couples argued that they were not asking for the Supreme Court to "create" a new right, allowing same-sex couples to marry. Attorneys for …
Buckley v. Valeo: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact
Dec 13, 2019 · Arguments Attorneys representing those opposing the regulations argued that Congress had disregarded the importance of campaign contributions as a form of speech. …
Furman v. Georgia: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact
Dec 13, 2019 · Arguments . The State of Georgia argued that the death penalty had been lawfully applied. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments provide that no state “shall deprive any person …
What Is an Argument? - ThoughtCo
What Is an Argument? - ThoughtCo
Munn v. Illinois: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact
Jan 31, 2020 · Arguments . Munn and Scott argued that the state had unlawfully deprived them of their property rights. Central to the concept of owning property is being able to use it freely. In …
Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty - ThoughtCo
Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty - ThoughtCo
Escobedo v. Illinois: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact
Jul 1, 2019 · Arguments . An attorney representing Escobedo argued that police had violated his right to due process when they prevented him from speaking with an attorney. The statements …
Cooper v. Aaron: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact
Nov 19, 2019 · Arguments . The school board argued that the desegregation plan had caused immense unrest, propelled by the Governor of Arkansas himself. Further integration of the …
50 Compelling Argumentative Essay Topics - ThoughtCo
50 Compelling Argumentative Essay Topics - ThoughtCo
United States v. Jones: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact
Jan 31, 2020 · Arguments . The government argued that vehicles access public streets regularly and are not subject to an expectation of privacy in the same way that a home is. Attorneys …
Obergefell v. Hodges: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impacts
Nov 19, 2019 · Arguments Attorneys on behalf of the couples argued that they were not asking for the Supreme Court to "create" a new right, allowing same-sex couples to marry. Attorneys for …
Buckley v. Valeo: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact
Dec 13, 2019 · Arguments Attorneys representing those opposing the regulations argued that Congress had disregarded the importance of campaign contributions as a form of speech. …
Furman v. Georgia: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact
Dec 13, 2019 · Arguments . The State of Georgia argued that the death penalty had been lawfully applied. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments provide that no state “shall deprive any person …
What Is an Argument? - ThoughtCo
What Is an Argument? - ThoughtCo
Munn v. Illinois: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact
Jan 31, 2020 · Arguments . Munn and Scott argued that the state had unlawfully deprived them of their property rights. Central to the concept of owning property is being able to use it freely. In …
Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty - ThoughtCo
Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty - ThoughtCo
Escobedo v. Illinois: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact
Jul 1, 2019 · Arguments . An attorney representing Escobedo argued that police had violated his right to due process when they prevented him from speaking with an attorney. The statements …
Cooper v. Aaron: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact
Nov 19, 2019 · Arguments . The school board argued that the desegregation plan had caused immense unrest, propelled by the Governor of Arkansas himself. Further integration of the …
