Advertisement
| doe office of science org chart: Final Report of the Committee on a Strategic Plan for U.S. Burning Plasma Research National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Physics and Astronomy, Committee on a Strategic Plan for U.S. Burning Plasma Research, 2019-07-01 Fusion offers the prospect of virtually unlimited energy. The United States and many nations around the world have made enormous progress toward achieving fusion energy. With ITER scheduled to go online within a decade and demonstrate controlled fusion ten years later, now is the right time for the United States to develop plans to benefit from its investment in burning plasma research and take steps to develop fusion electricity for the nation's future energy needs. At the request of the Department of Energy, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine organized a committee to develop a strategic plan for U.S. fusion research. The final report's two main recommendations are: (1) The United States should remain an ITER partner as the most cost-effective way to gain experience with a burning plasma at the scale of a power plant. (2) The United States should start a national program of accompanying research and technology leading to the construction of a compact pilot plant that produces electricity from fusion at the lowest possible capital cost. |
| doe office of science org chart: Nuclear Proliferation and Arms Control Monitoring, Detection, and Verification National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Policy and Global Affairs, Committee on International Security and Arms Control, Committee on the Review of Capabilities for Detection Verification and Monitoring of Nuclear Weapons and Fissile Material, 2022-01-19 At the request of Congress, this report presents findings and recommendations related to governance of the U.S. government's monitoring, detection, and verification (MDV) enterprise and offers findings and recommendations related to technical MDV capabilities and research, development, test, and evaluation efforts, focused in particular on the nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear test explosions, and arms control. |
| doe office of science org chart: Oversight and Management of Department of Energy National Laboratories and Science Activities United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology (2011). Subcommittee on Energy, 2013 |
| doe office of science org chart: Decision Making in the U.S. Department of Energy's Environmental Management Office of Science and Technology National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources, Committee on Prioritization and Decision Making in the Department of Energy Office of Science and Technology, 1999-08-12 Printbegrænsninger: Der kan printes 10 sider ad gangen og max. 40 sider pr. session. |
| doe office of science org chart: Government Research Directory , 2010 |
| doe office of science org chart: External Regulation of DOE Facilities United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science. Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, 2000 |
| doe office of science org chart: Beyond Sputnik Homer A. Neal, 2008 |
| doe office of science org chart: Beyond Sputnik Homer Alfred Neal, Tobin L. Smith, Jennifer B. McCormick, 2008-07-23 DIVA timely introduction to all facets of U.S. national science policy/div |
| doe office of science org chart: The Office of Environmental Management Technical Reports , 1997 |
| doe office of science org chart: New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Space Studies Board, Board on Physics and Astronomy, Committee for a Decadal Survey of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2011-02-04 Driven by discoveries, and enabled by leaps in technology and imagination, our understanding of the universe has changed dramatically during the course of the last few decades. The fields of astronomy and astrophysics are making new connections to physics, chemistry, biology, and computer science. Based on a broad and comprehensive survey of scientific opportunities, infrastructure, and organization in a national and international context, New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics outlines a plan for ground- and space- based astronomy and astrophysics for the decade of the 2010's. Realizing these scientific opportunities is contingent upon maintaining and strengthening the foundations of the research enterprise including technological development, theory, computation and data handling, laboratory experiments, and human resources. New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics proposes enhancing innovative but moderate-cost programs in space and on the ground that will enable the community to respond rapidly and flexibly to new scientific discoveries. The book recommends beginning construction on survey telescopes in space and on the ground to investigate the nature of dark energy, as well as the next generation of large ground-based giant optical telescopes and a new class of space-based gravitational observatory to observe the merging of distant black holes and precisely test theories of gravity. New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics recommends a balanced and executable program that will support research surrounding the most profound questions about the cosmos. The discoveries ahead will facilitate the search for habitable planets, shed light on dark energy and dark matter, and aid our understanding of the history of the universe and how the earliest stars and galaxies formed. The book is a useful resource for agencies supporting the field of astronomy and astrophysics, the Congressional committees with jurisdiction over those agencies, the scientific community, and the public. |
| doe office of science org chart: Fiscal Year 2000 Department of Energy Budget Authorization Request, Parts I and II United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science. Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, 2000 |
| doe office of science org chart: The U.S. Intelligence Community Jeffrey T Richelson, 2015-07-14 The role of intelligence in US government operations has changed dramatically and is now more critical than ever to domestic security and foreign policy. This authoritative and highly researched book written by Jeffrey T. Richelson provides a detailed overview of America's vast intelligence empire, from its organizations and operations to its management structure. Drawing from a multitude of sources, including hundreds of official documents, The US Intelligence Community allows students to understand the full scope of intelligence organizations and activities, and gives valuable support to policymakers and military operations. The seventh edition has been fully revised to include a new chapter on the major issues confronting the intelligence community, including secrecy and leaks, domestic spying, and congressional oversight, as well as revamped chapters on signals intelligence and cyber collection, geospatial intelligence, and open sources. The inclusion of more maps, tables and photos, as well as electronic briefing books on the book's Web site, makes The US Intelligence Community an even more valuable and engaging resource for students. |
| doe office of science org chart: Federal Advisory Committees United States. General Accounting Office, 2004 |
| doe office of science org chart: Fiscal Year 1989 Department of Energy Authorization: Supporting research and technical analysis, energy R&D, and general science and research programs United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Energy Research and Development, 1989 |
| doe office of science org chart: Federal Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Program (NITRD) Patricia Moloney Figliola, 2010-08 Contents: (1) Overview, Structure and Funding of NITRD:: Amer. Recovery and Reinvest. Act of 2009; Amer. Competitiveness Initiative; NCO, PITAC, and Related Reports and Activities: National Cyber Leap Year Summit; High-Confidence Medical Devices: Cyber-Physical Systems for 21st Cent. Health Care; Digital Data for Science and Society; Fed. Plan for Advanced Networking R&D; Info. Tech. R&D in a Competitive World; Fed. Plan for Cyber Security and Info. Assurance R&D; NSA Superconducting Tech. Assessment; Computational Science; Cyber Security; NITRD Enabling and Governing Legislation: High-Performance Computing Act of 1991; Next Generation Internet Research Act of 1998; (2) Fed. Tech. Funding. Illus. |
| doe office of science org chart: The Department of Energy's FY 1997 Budget Request for Environment, Safety and Health, Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (non-defense) and Nuclear Energy United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science. Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, 1997 |
| doe office of science org chart: Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 2011: Dept. of Energy: Environmental management and legacy management; energy efficiency and renewable energy ... science and ARPA-E United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, 2010 |
| doe office of science org chart: Assessing the Department of Energy's Management of the National Laboratory System United States. Congress. House. Committee on Commerce. Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, 1997 |
| doe office of science org chart: Department of Defense authorization for appropriations for fiscal year 2002 United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services, 2002 |
| doe office of science org chart: Fiscal Year 2001 Budget Authorization Request United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science. Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, 2001 |
| doe office of science org chart: Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports , 1985 |
| doe office of science org chart: Organizational Physics - The Science of Growing a Business Lex Sisney, 2013-03-01 There are hidden laws at work in every aspect of your business. Understand them, and you can create extraordinary growth. Ignore them, and you run the risk of becoming another statistic. It's become almost cliche: 8 out of every 10 new ventures fail. Of the ones that succeed, how many truly thrive-for the long run? And of those that thrive, how many continually overcome their growth hurdles ... and ultimately scale, with meaning, purpose, and profitability? The answer, sadly, is not many. Author Lex Sisney is on a mission to change that picture. After more than a decade spent leading and coaching high-growth technology companies, Lex discovered that the companies that thrive do so in accordance with 6 Laws - universal principles that govern the success or failure of every individual, team, and organization. |
| doe office of science org chart: Federal advisory committees additional guidance could help agencies better ensure independence and balance : report to congressional requesters. , 2004 |
| doe office of science org chart: Review of the Research Program of the U.S. DRIVE Partnership National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, Committee on Review of the U.S. DRIVE Research Program, Phase 4, 2013-05-13 Review of the Research Program of the U.S. DRIVE Partnership: Fourth Report follows on three previous NRC reviews of the FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership, which was the predecessor of the U.S. DRIVE Partnership (NRC, 2005, 2008a, 2010). The U.S. DRIVE (Driving Research and Innovation for Vehicle Efficiency and Energy Sustainability) vision, according to the charter of the Partnership, is this: American consumers have a broad range of affordable personal transportation choices that reduce petroleum consumption and significantly reduce harmful emissions from the transportation sector. Its mission is as follows: accelerate the development of pre-competitive and innovative technologies to enable a full range of efficient and clean advanced light-duty vehicles (LDVs), as well as related energy infrastructure. The Partnership focuses on precompetitive research and development (R&D) that can help to accelerate the emergence of advanced technologies to be commercialization-feasible. The guidance for the work of the U.S. DRIVE Partnership as well as the priority setting and targets for needed research are provided by joint industry/government technical teams. This structure has been demonstrated to be an effective means of identifying high-priority, long-term precompetitive research needs for each technology with which the Partnership is involved. Technical areas in which research and development as well as technology validation programs have been pursued include the following: internal combustion engines (ICEs) potentially operating on conventional and various alternative fuels, automotive fuel cell power systems, hydrogen storage systems (especially onboard vehicles), batteries and other forms of electrochemical energy storage, electric propulsion systems, hydrogen production and delivery, and materials leading to vehicle weight reductions. |
| doe office of science org chart: The Administration's Climate Change Initiative United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, 2002 |
| doe office of science org chart: NEWS Act United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Subcommittee on Water and Power, 2014 |
| doe office of science org chart: Science in the Mission Agencies and Federal Laboratories United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Technology. Task Force on Science Policy, 1987 |
| doe office of science org chart: The Rural Educator , 2007 |
| doe office of science org chart: Department of Energy fundamental reassessment needed to address major mission, structure, and accountability problems. , 2001 |
| doe office of science org chart: DOE this Month , 1993 |
| doe office of science org chart: Intelligent Sustainment and Renewal of Department of Energy Facilities and Infrastructure National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment, Committee on the Renewal of Department of Energy Infrastructure, 2005-01-16 The United States Department of Energy's (DOE) facilities stewardship is extremely important to the department's ability to achieve its mission of protecting national, energy, and economic security with advanced science and technology and ensuring environmental cleanup. Intelligent Sustainment and Renewal of Department of Energy Facilities and Infrastructure evaluates the steps the department is taking to improve its facilities and infrastructure management. This report develops best-practice techniques for DOE real property asset management and guidelines for deciding when to repair, renovate, or replace DOE buildings. |
| doe office of science org chart: Department of Energy Information , 1980 |
| doe office of science org chart: Transportation Energy Data Book , 2005 |
| doe office of science org chart: Washington Information Directory 2008-2009 CQ Press, 2008-06-25 Lists addresses and telephone and fax numbers for federal agencies, Congress, and nongovernmental organizations in Washington, D.C. |
| doe office of science org chart: An Assessment of ARPA-E National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, Policy and Global Affairs, Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy, Committee on Evaluation of the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), 2017-08-03 In 2005, the National Research Council report Rising Above the Gathering Storm recommended a new way for the federal government to spur technological breakthroughs in the energy sector. It recommended the creation of a new agency, the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, or ARPA-E, as an adaptation of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) modelâ€widely considered a successful experiment that has funded out-of-the-box, transformative research and engineering that made possible the Internet, GPS, and stealth aircraft. This new agency was envisioned as a means of tackling the nation's energy challenges in a way that could translate basic research into technological breakthroughs while also addressing economic, environmental, and security issues. Congress authorized ARPA-E in the 2007 America COMPETES Act and requested an early assessment following 6 years of operation to examine the agency's progress toward achieving its statutory mission and goals. This publication summarizes the results of that assessment. |
| doe office of science org chart: Microbe , 2006 |
| doe office of science org chart: 1979 Department of Energy authorization United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Technology, 1978 |
| doe office of science org chart: Managing for High-Quality Science and Engineering at the NNSA National Security Laboratories Committee to Review the Quality of the Management and of the Science and Engineering Research at the Department of Energy's National Security Laboratories - Phase 1, Laboratory Assessments Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council, National Academies, 2013-09-03 The three National Security Laboratories--Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)--are managed by private-sector entities under contract to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). The FY2010 Defense Authorization Act mandated that NNSA task the National Research Council (NRC) to study the quality and management of Science and Engineering (S&E) at these Laboratories. This study (addressing a total of 5 tasks) is being conducted in two phases. This report covers the first phase, which addresses the relationship between the quality of the science and engineering at the Laboratory and the contract for managing and operating the Laboratory (task 4), and also addresses the management of work conducted by the Laboratory for entities other than the Department of Energy (task 5). The study's second phase will evaluate the actual quality of S&E in key subject areas. Managing for High-Quality Science and Engineering at the NNSA National Security Laboratories presents assessments of the evolution of the mission of the NNSA Labs and the management and performance of research in support of the missions, and the relationship between the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program and the ability of the Labs to fulfill their mission. The report examines the framework for managing science and engineering research at the Labs and provides an analysis of the relationships among the several players in the management of the Labs--the NNSA, the site offices, the contractors, and the Lab managers--and the effect of that relationship on the Laboratories' ability to carry out science and engineering research. |
| doe office of science org chart: Department of Energy Budget Request for Fiscal Year 2002 United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Subcommittee on Military Procurement, 2002 |
| doe office of science org chart: Energy Research Abstracts , 1993 Semiannual, with semiannual and annual indexes. References to all scientific and technical literature coming from DOE, its laboratories, energy centers, and contractors. Includes all works deriving from DOE, other related government-sponsored information, and foreign nonnuclear information. Arranged under 39 categories, e.g., Biomedical sciences, basic studies; Biomedical sciences, applied studies; Health and safety; and Fusion energy. Entry gives bibliographical information and abstract. Corporate, author, subject, report number indexes. |
How to judge size of doe? - Michigan Sportsman Forum
Oct 26, 2009 · I was about to draw and just felt it looked small. It was not a button buck and had a long slender snout. It would have made it a bit easier if there was another standing next to her …
Doe or Does? What is the plural? | Michigan Sportsman Forum
Nov 20, 2011 · I saw a doe. But if it is 2 deer, it can get more complicated. I saw 2 doe. I saw 2 does. OK.....so what do you say? I have always said "does".....as do most people I hunt with or …
field dressing a doe | Michigan Sportsman Forum
Nov 26, 2007 · If the doe is not "Dry" you will want to cut the teets and the milk sack first. It's actually very easy to just take a sharp knife and guide it around the sack until it comes loose. …
Difference between and fawn and a yearling - Michigan …
Sep 22, 2008 · The difference between button bucks and doe fawns. Study the faces of the two, I always felt button bucks had shorter, kinda budgy look in the face and does had a longer more …
Worst possible buck to doe ratio? | Michigan Sportsman Forum
Apr 7, 2006 · Prior to antler restrictions and liberalized doe harvests, Pennsylvania was considered to be among the poorest managed states in the country. Even then, Pennsylvania …
When do fawns stray from Momma? | Michigan Sportsman Forum
Sep 2, 2008 · The article is titled "Doe Decisions" pg. 104 - buck fawns were found to do better when they left the doe earlier then the doe fawns. - By the time Bow season opens, fawns are …
The Myth of 10:1 Doe to Buck Ratios | Michigan Sportsman Forum
Nov 19, 2007 · What the example does provide (with the layer of carrying capacity) is a straightforward proof of why the ratio on heavily buck-hunted land can result in a continuing …
Lake county doe harvest - Michigan Sportsman Forum
Nov 29, 2022 · Lake county is the only county in Michigan shooting more does then bucks. Also notice the high population counties are killing 2 bucks for each doe. Universal doe tags have …
DNR Approvers New Low Price Doe Permits for the late Season!
Sep 21, 2024 · At any rate, I'll be out there. For whatever reason I often see more does late December than any other time - they come through in massive groups all the time. I'm …
Have you created a Doe Factory - Michigan Sportsman Forum
Mar 26, 2018 · A doe factory (to me anyways) is producing ,rather than attracting doe. Meaning fawn recruitment. Twenty doe in a plot does not mean they are being produced on ,or due to …
How to judge size of doe? - Michigan Sportsman Forum
Oct 26, 2009 · I was about to draw and just felt it looked small. It was not a button buck and had a long slender snout. It would have made it a bit easier if there was another standing next to her …
Doe or Does? What is the plural? | Michigan Sportsman Forum
Nov 20, 2011 · I saw a doe. But if it is 2 deer, it can get more complicated. I saw 2 doe. I saw 2 does. OK.....so what do you say? I have always said "does".....as do most people I hunt with or …
field dressing a doe | Michigan Sportsman Forum
Nov 26, 2007 · If the doe is not "Dry" you will want to cut the teets and the milk sack first. It's actually very easy to just take a sharp knife and guide it around the sack until it comes loose. …
Difference between and fawn and a yearling - Michigan …
Sep 22, 2008 · The difference between button bucks and doe fawns. Study the faces of the two, I always felt button bucks had shorter, kinda budgy look in the face and does had a longer more …
Worst possible buck to doe ratio? | Michigan Sportsman Forum
Apr 7, 2006 · Prior to antler restrictions and liberalized doe harvests, Pennsylvania was considered to be among the poorest managed states in the country. Even then, Pennsylvania …
When do fawns stray from Momma? | Michigan Sportsman Forum
Sep 2, 2008 · The article is titled "Doe Decisions" pg. 104 - buck fawns were found to do better when they left the doe earlier then the doe fawns. - By the time Bow season opens, fawns are …
The Myth of 10:1 Doe to Buck Ratios | Michigan Sportsman Forum
Nov 19, 2007 · What the example does provide (with the layer of carrying capacity) is a straightforward proof of why the ratio on heavily buck-hunted land can result in a continuing …
Lake county doe harvest - Michigan Sportsman Forum
Nov 29, 2022 · Lake county is the only county in Michigan shooting more does then bucks. Also notice the high population counties are killing 2 bucks for each doe. Universal doe tags have …
DNR Approvers New Low Price Doe Permits for the late Season!
Sep 21, 2024 · At any rate, I'll be out there. For whatever reason I often see more does late December than any other time - they come through in massive groups all the time. I'm …
Have you created a Doe Factory - Michigan Sportsman Forum
Mar 26, 2018 · A doe factory (to me anyways) is producing ,rather than attracting doe. Meaning fawn recruitment. Twenty doe in a plot does not mean they are being produced on ,or due to …
