Advertisement
| dr doe does chemistry: The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines ... Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association), 1922 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Improving the Scientific Basis for Managing DOE's Excess Nuclear Materials and Spent Nuclear Fuel National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Radioactive Waste Management, Committee on Improving the Scientific Basis for Managing Nuclear Materials and Spent Nuclear Fuel through the Environmental Management Science Program, 2003-06-09 The production of nuclear materials for the national defense was an intense, nationwide effort that began with the Manhattan Project and continued throughout the Cold War. Now many of these product materials, by-products, and precursors, such as irradiated nuclear fuels and targets, have been declared as excess by the Department of Energy (DOE). Most of this excess inventory has been, or will be, turned over to DOE's Office of Environmental Management (EM), which is responsible for cleaning up the former production sites. Recognizing the scientific and technical challenges facing EM, Congress in 1995 established the EM Science Program (EMSP) to develop and fund directed, long-term research that could substantially enhance the knowledge base available for new cleanup technologies and decision making. The EMSP has previously asked the National Academies' National Research Council for advice for developing research agendas in subsurface contamination, facility deactivation and decommissioning, high-level waste, and mixed and transuranic waste. For this study the committee was tasked to provide recommendations for a research agenda to improve the scientific basis for DOE's management of its high-cost, high-volume, or high-risk excess nuclear materials and spent nuclear fuels. To address its task, the committee focused its attention on DOE's excess plutonium-239, spent nuclear fuels, cesium-137 and strontium-90 capsules, depleted uranium, and higher actinide isotopes. |
| dr doe does chemistry: Chemical Contaminants on DOE Lands and Selection of Contaminant Mixtures for Subsurface Science Research Robert G. Riley, 1992 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Collaboratories: Improving Research Capabilities in Chemical and Biomedical Sciences North Carolina Board of Science and Technology and National Research Council, 1999-06-14 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Systems and Technologies for the Treatment of Non-Stockpile Chemical Warfare Materiel National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Army Science and Technology, Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Non-Stockpile Chemical Materiel Disposal Program, 2002-08-01 The main approach adopted by the U.S. Army for destruction of all declared chemical weapon materiel (CWM) is incineration. There has been considerable public opposition to this approach, however, and the Army is developing a mix of fixed site and mobile treatment technologies to dispose of non-stockpile CWM. To assist in this effort, the Army requested NRC to review and evaluate these technologies, and to assess its plans for obtaining regulatory approval for and to involve the public in decisions about the application of those technologies. This book presents an assessment of non-stockpile treatment options and the application of these systems to the non-stockpile inventory, of regulatory and permitting issues, and of the role of the public. |
| dr doe does chemistry: Journal of the American Medical Association , 1916 Includes proceedings of the association, papers read at the annual sessions, and lists of current medical literature. |
| dr doe does chemistry: General Chemistry for Engineers Jeffrey Gaffney, Nancy Marley, 2017-11-13 General Chemistry for Engineers explores the key areas of chemistry needed for engineers. This book develops material from the basics to more advanced areas in a systematic fashion. As the material is presented, case studies relevant to engineering are included that demonstrate the strong link between chemistry and the various areas of engineering. - Serves as a unique chemistry reference source for professional engineers - Provides the chemistry principles required by various engineering disciplines - Begins with an 'atoms first' approach, building from the simple to the more complex chemical concepts - Includes engineering case studies connecting chemical principles to solving actual engineering problems - Links chemistry to contemporary issues related to the interface between chemistry and engineering practices |
| dr doe does chemistry: Drug & Chemical Markets , 1923 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Design of Experiments in Chemical Engineering Zivorad R. Lazic, 2006-03-06 While existing books related to DOE are focused either on process or mixture factors or analyze specific tools from DOE science, this text is structured both horizontally and vertically, covering the three most common objectives of any experimental research: * screening designs * mathematical modeling, and * optimization. Written in a simple and lively manner and backed by current chemical product studies from all around the world, the book elucidates basic concepts of statistical methods, experiment design and optimization techniques as applied to chemistry and chemical engineering. Throughout, the focus is on unifying the theory and methodology of optimization with well-known statistical and experimental methods. The author draws on his own experience in research and development, resulting in a work that will assist students, scientists and engineers in using the concepts covered here in seeking optimum conditions for a chemical system or process. With 441 tables, 250 diagrams, as well as 200 examples drawn from current chemical product studies, this is an invaluable and convenient source of information for all those involved in process optimization. |
| dr doe does chemistry: The propaganda for reform in proprietary medicines American medical association. Council on pharmacy and chemistry, 1922 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Fiscal Year 1989 Department of Energy Authorization: Supporting research and technical analysis, energy R&D, and general science and research programs United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Energy Research and Development, 1989 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Energy and water development appropriations for 1990 United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, 1989 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1990: Pages (1871-3397) Testimony of members of Congress and other interested individuals and organizations United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, 1989 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Bioinspired Chemistry for Energy National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology, Chemical Sciences Roundtable, 2008-04-07 Faced with the steady rise in energy costs, dwindling fossil fuel supplies, and the need to maintain a healthy environment - exploration of alternative energy sources is essential for meeting energy needs. Biological systems employ a variety of efficient ways to collect, store, use, and produce energy. By understanding the basic processes of biological models, scientists may be able to create systems that mimic biomolecules and produce energy in an efficient and cost effective manner. On May 14-15, 2007 a group of chemists, chemical engineers, and others from academia, government, and industry participated in a workshop sponsored by the Chemical Sciences Roundtable to explore how bioinspired chemistry can help solve some of the important energy issues the world faces today. The workshop featured presentations and discussions on the current energy challenges and how to address them, with emphasis on both the fundamental aspects and the robust implementation of bioinspired chemistry for energy. |
| dr doe does chemistry: Chemist , 1966 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Boston Medical and Surgical Journal , 1889 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Department of Energy Information , 1979 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Department of Energy Information United States Department of Energy, |
| dr doe does chemistry: The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal , 1891 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Final Review of the Study on Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Committee on Supplemental Treatment of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, 2020-03-30 The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management is responsible for managing and cleaning up the waste and contamination at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, the nation's biggest and most complex nuclear cleanup challenge. At the site, 177 underground tanks collectively contain about 211 million liters of waste that includes high-activity and low-activity materials. At the request of Congress, Final Review of the Study on Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #4 focuses on approaches for treatment and disposal of the supplemental portion of the low-activity waste from the tanks. This review report discusses developments since the publication of Review #3 and provides a summary of public comments on the third committee review report. The authoring committee then shares their views on these comments and whether they change any of the findings or recommendations in the third review report. |
| dr doe does chemistry: Review of the Final Draft Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Committee on Supplemental Treatment of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, 2019-08-15 In 1943, as part of the Manhattan Project, the Hanford Nuclear Reservation was established with the mission to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons. During 45 years of operations, the Hanford Site produced about 67 metric tonnes of plutoniumâ€approximately two-thirds of the nation's stockpile. Production processes generated radioactive and other hazardous wastes and resulted in airborne, surface, subsurface, and groundwater contamination. Presently, 177 underground tanks contain collectively about 210 million liters (about 56 million gallons) of waste. The chemically complex and diverse waste is difficult to manage and dispose of safely. Section 3134 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 calls for a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) to conduct an analysis of approaches for treating the portion of low-activity waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation intended for supplemental treatment. The third of four, this report provides an overall assessment of the FFRDC team's final draft report, dated April 5, 2019. |
| dr doe does chemistry: Department of Energy Office of Science--issues and Opportunities United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science. Subcommittee on Energy, 2002 |
| dr doe does chemistry: A Research Agenda for Transforming Separation Science National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology, Committee on a Research Agenda for a New Era in Separation Science, 2019-09-30 Separation science plays a critical role in maintaining our standard of living and quality of life. Many industrial processes and general necessities such as chemicals, medicines, clean water, safe food, and energy sources rely on chemical separations. However, the process of chemical separations is often overlooked during product development and this has led to inefficiency, unnecessary waste, and lack of consensus among chemists and engineers. A reevaluation of system design, establishment of standards, and an increased focus on the advancement of separation science are imperative in supporting increased efficiency, continued U.S. manufacturing competitiveness, and public welfare. A Research Agenda for Transforming Separation Science explores developments in the industry since the 1987 National Academies report, Separation and Purification: Critical Needs and Opportunities. Many needs stated in the original report remain today, in addition to a variety of new challenges due to improved detection limits, advances in medicine, and a recent emphasis on sustainability and environmental stewardship. This report examines emerging chemical separation technologies, relevant developments in intersecting disciplines, and gaps in existing research, and provides recommendations for the application of improved separation science technologies and processes. This research serves as a foundation for transforming separation science, which could reduce global energy use, improve human and environmental health, and advance more efficient practices in various industries. |
| dr doe does chemistry: Advanced Coal Combustion Systems United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Technology. Subcommittee on Energy Development and Applications, 1981 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Effectiveness of the United States Advanced Battery Consortium as a Government-Industry Partnership National Research Council, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee to Review the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium's Electric Vehicle Battery Research and Development Project Selection Process, 1998-09-14 This study by the National Research Council (NRC) was requested by DOE's Office of Advanced Automotive Technologies. The study focuses on the processes used by the USABC to select, evaluate, and manage R&D projects on EV batteries in Phases I and II of the program. |
| dr doe does chemistry: Frontiers of Materials Research National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Physics and Astronomy, National Materials and Manufacturing Board, Committee on Frontiers of Materials Research: A Decadal Survey, 2019-09-12 Modern materials science builds on knowledge from physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics, computer and data science, and engineering sciences to enable us to understand, control, and expand the material world. Although it is anchored in inquiry-based fundamental science, materials research is strongly focused on discovering and producing reliable and economically viable materials, from super alloys to polymer composites, that are used in a vast array of products essential to today's societies and economies. Frontiers of Materials Research: A Decadal Survey is aimed at documenting the status and promising future directions of materials research in the United States in the context of similar efforts worldwide. This third decadal survey in materials research reviews the progress and achievements in materials research and changes in the materials research landscape over the last decade; research opportunities for investment for the period 2020-2030; impacts that materials research has had and is expected to have on emerging technologies, national needs, and science; and challenges the enterprise may face over the next decade. |
| dr doe does chemistry: Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry Society of Chemical Industry (Great Britain), 1925 Includes list of members, 1882-1902, proceedings of the annual meetings and various supplements. |
| dr doe does chemistry: Clean Air Act Amendments of 1987 United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Subcommittee on Environmental Protection, 1987 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Stratospheric Ozone Depletion and Chlorofluorocarbons United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Subcommittee on Environmental Protection, 1987 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Green Chemistry Research and Development Act of 2004 United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, 2004 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Grant Opportunities for Chemists National Science Foundation (U.S.). Division of Chemistry, 1990 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase One) National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, Committee on Prospective Benefits of DOE's Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy R&D Programs, 2005-06-27 In 2001, the National Research Council (NRC) completed a congressionally mandated assessment of the benefits and costs of DOE's fossil energy and energy efficiency R&D programs, Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It? The Congress followed this retrospective study by directing DOE to request the NRC to develop a methodology for assessing prospective benefits. The first phase of this projectâ€development of the methodologyâ€began in December 2003. Phase two will make the methodology more robust and explore related issues, and subsequent phases will apply the methodology to review the prospective benefits of different DOE fossil energy and energy efficiency R&D programs. In developing this project, three considerations were particularly important. First, the study should adapt the work of the retrospective study. Second, the project should develop a methodology that provides a rigorous calculation of benefits and risks, and a practical and consistent process for its application. Third, the methodology should be transparent, should not require extensive resources for implementation, and should produce easily understood results. This report presents the results of phase one. It focuses on adaptation of the retrospective methodology to a prospective context. |
| dr doe does chemistry: Federation Bulletin , 1918 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Monthly Bulletin , 1919 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Fiscal Year 1986 DOE Budget Authorization United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Technology. Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Agriculture Research, and Environment, 1985 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Geriatrics , 1962 |
| dr doe does chemistry: Disposal of Neutralent Wastes National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Army Science and Technology, Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Non-Stockpile Chemical Materiel Disposal Program, 2001-04-29 Chemical warfare materiel (CWM) is a collection of diverse items that were used during 60 years of efforts by the United States to develop a capability for conducting chemical warfare. Nonstockpile CWM, which is not included in the current U.S. inventory of chemical munitions, includes buried materiel, recovered materiel, binary chemical weapons, former production facilities, and miscellaneous materiel. CWM that was buried in pits on former military sites is now being dug up as the land is being developed for other purposes. Other CWM is on or near the surface at former test and firing ranges. According to the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), which was ratified by the United States in April 1997, nonstockpile CWM items in storage at the time of ratification must be destroyed by 2007. The U.S. Army is the designated executive agent for destroying CWM. Nonstockpile CWM is being handled by the Non-Stockpile Chemical Materiel Program (NSCMP); stockpile CWM is the responsibility of the Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program. Because nonstockpile CWM is stored or buried in many locations, the Army is developing transportable disposal systems that can be moved from site to site as needed. The Army has plans to test prototypes of three transportable systems-the rapid response system (RRS), the munitions management device (MMD), and the explosive destruction system (EDS)-for accessing and destroying a range of nonstockpile chemical agents and militarized industrial chemicals. The RRS is designed to treat recovered chemical agent identification sets (CAIS), which contain small amounts of chemical agents and a variety of highly toxic industrial chemicals. The MMD is designed to treat nonexplosively configured chemical munitions. The EDS is designed to treat munitions containing chemical agents with energetics equivalent to three pounds of TNT or less. These munitions are considered too unstable to be transported or stored. A prototype EDS system has recently been tested in England by non-stockpile program personnel. Although originally proposed for evaluation in this report, no test data were available to the committee on the composition of wastes from the EDS. Therefore, alternative technologies for the destruction of EDS wastes will be discussed in a supplemental report in fall 2001. Treatment of solid wastes, such as metal munition bodies, packing materials, and carbon air filters, were excluded from this report. Review and Evaluation of the Army Non-Stockpile Chemical Materiel Disposal Program: Disposal of Neutralent Wastes evaluates the near-term (1999-2005) application of advanced (nonincineration) technologies, such as from the Army's Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment Program and the Alternative Technologies and Approaches Project, in a semi-fixed, skid-mounted mode to process Rapid Response System, Munitions Management Device, and Explosive Destruction System liquid neutralization wastes. |
| dr doe does chemistry: Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase Two) National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, Committee on Prospective Benefits of DOE's Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy R&D Programs (Phase Two), 2007-08-17 Since its inception in 1977 from an amalgam of federal authorities, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has administered numerous programs aimed at developing applied energy technologies. In recent years, federal oversight of public expenditures has emphasized the integration of performance and budgeting. Notably, the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) was passed in 1993 in response to questions about the value and effectiveness of federal programs. GPRA and other mandates have led agencies to develop indicators of program performance and program outcomes. The development of indicators has been watched with keen interest by Congress, which has requested of the National Research Council (NRC) a series of reports using quantitative indicators to evaluate the effectiveness of applied energy research and development (R&D). The first such report took a retrospective view of the first 3 years of DOE R&D programs on fossil energy and energy efficiency. The report found that DOE-sponsored research had netted large commercial successes, such as advanced refrigerator compressors, electronic lighting ballasts, and emission control technology for flue gas desulfurization. However, some programs were judged to be costly failures in which large R&D expenditures did not result in a commercial energy technology. A follow-up NRC committee was assigned the task of adapting the methodology to the assessment of the future payoff of continuing programs. Evaluating the outcome of R&D expenditures requires an analysis of program costs and benefits. Doing so is not a trivial matter. First, the analysis of costs and benefits must reflect the full range of public benefits that are envisioned, accounting for environmental and energy security impacts as well as economic effects. Second, the analysis must consider how likely the research is to succeed and how valuable the research will be if successful. Finally, the analysis must consider what might happen if the government did not support the project: Would some non-DOE entity undertake it or an equivalent activity that would produce some or all of the benefits of government involvement? This second report continues to investigate the development and use of R&D outcome indicators and applies the benefits evaluation methodology to six DOE R&D activities. It provides further definition for the development of indicators for environmental and security benefits and refines the evaluation process based on its experience with the six DOE R&D case studies. |
| dr doe does chemistry: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics David R. Lide, 1995-03-09 This student edition features over 50 new or completely revised tables, most of which are in the areas of fluid properties and properties of solids. The book also features extensive references to other compilations and databases that contain additional information. |
| dr doe does chemistry: Metallurgical & Chemical Engineering , 1915 |
James Dimitroff, M.D. - Esse Health Corporate
He has served as the Chief of Medicine at Incarnate Word Hospital and has been the Section Chief of Gastroenterology and Medical Director of the Endoscopy Laboratory at Saint …
Mercy | Doctors, Hospitals & Clinics in MO, AR, OK & KS
Mercy is one of the largest U.S. health systems with 44 acute care & specialty hospitals, over 700 physician & outpatient clinics in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri & Oklahoma.
Best Family Physicians Near Me in Saint Louis, MO | WebMD
Saint Louis, MO has 1440 Family Physician results with an average of 28 years of experience and a total of 5354 reviews. Need help deciding? Explore feedback from real patients, what awards...
BJC Medical Group Primary Care at Missouri Baptist Medical ...
The physicians at BJC Medical Group Primary Care at Missouri Baptist Medical Center are available to make that yearly checkup a reality. These providers are known for their …
Dr. John Clohisy | Hip and Knee Surgeon | Washington ...
Division of Joint Preservation, Reconstruction and Replacement. Chief, Adult Reconstructive Surgery. Director, Center for Adolescent and Young Adult Hip Disorders. Medical Director, …
Meet Our Doctors — Eye Care Associates of St. Louis
Today, Eye Care Associates of St. Louis continues to provide comprehensive ophthalmologic services for people of all ages.
Michael J. Reiter, MD - Neurosurgery of St. Louis | STL Brain ...
Contact Mike Reiter, MD. from Neurosurgery of St. Louis today to schedule an appointment. Click to learn more about Dr. Reiter.
Michael V. Oliveri, Ph.D., ABPP
Dr. Michael Oliveri is a Missouri based board-certified clinical neuropsychologist with over 35 years of post-doctoral professional experience primarily in medical settings. His office is …
P. Kumar Rao, MD, MBA - WashU Medicine Physicians
WashU Medicine physicians are the medical staff of Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis Children's Hospital, and Siteman Cancer Center.
Dr. Thomas Wright M.D., F.A.C.P., R.V.T. - Medical Director ...
Dr. Thomas Wright, medical director of Laser, Lipo and Vein Center, is a board-certified physician who has specialized in venous and lymphatic medicine for over 20 years.
James Dimitroff, M.D. - Esse Health Corporate
He has served as the Chief of Medicine at Incarnate Word Hospital and has been the Section Chief of Gastroenterology and Medical Director of the Endoscopy Laboratory at Saint Anthony’s …
Mercy | Doctors, Hospitals & Clinics in MO, AR, OK & KS
Mercy is one of the largest U.S. health systems with 44 acute care & specialty hospitals, over 700 physician & outpatient clinics in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri & Oklahoma.
Best Family Physicians Near Me in Saint Louis, MO | WebMD
Saint Louis, MO has 1440 Family Physician results with an average of 28 years of experience and a total of 5354 reviews. Need help deciding? Explore feedback from real patients, what awards...
BJC Medical Group Primary Care at Missouri Baptist Medical ...
The physicians at BJC Medical Group Primary Care at Missouri Baptist Medical Center are available to make that yearly checkup a reality. These providers are known for their enthusiasm, expertise, …
Dr. John Clohisy | Hip and Knee Surgeon | Washington ...
Division of Joint Preservation, Reconstruction and Replacement. Chief, Adult Reconstructive Surgery. Director, Center for Adolescent and Young Adult Hip Disorders. Medical Director, …
Meet Our Doctors — Eye Care Associates of St. Louis
Today, Eye Care Associates of St. Louis continues to provide comprehensive ophthalmologic services for people of all ages.
Michael J. Reiter, MD - Neurosurgery of St. Louis | STL Brain ...
Contact Mike Reiter, MD. from Neurosurgery of St. Louis today to schedule an appointment. Click to learn more about Dr. Reiter.
Michael V. Oliveri, Ph.D., ABPP
Dr. Michael Oliveri is a Missouri based board-certified clinical neuropsychologist with over 35 years of post-doctoral professional experience primarily in medical settings. His office is located in St. …
P. Kumar Rao, MD, MBA - WashU Medicine Physicians
WashU Medicine physicians are the medical staff of Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis Children's Hospital, and Siteman Cancer Center.
Dr. Thomas Wright M.D., F.A.C.P., R.V.T. - Medical Director ...
Dr. Thomas Wright, medical director of Laser, Lipo and Vein Center, is a board-certified physician who has specialized in venous and lymphatic medicine for over 20 years.
