Advertisement
9th Circuit Court of Appeals Judges: Deconstructing the Political Party Affiliation
Author: Professor Anya Sharma, Ph.D., Professor of Political Science and Law at Stanford University. Professor Sharma specializes in judicial politics, focusing on the impact of partisan affiliation on judicial decision-making at the appellate level. Her work has been published in leading law reviews and political science journals.
Publisher: The American Bar Association (ABA) Journal, a leading publication known for its comprehensive coverage of legal issues and analysis.
Editor: Mark Williams, J.D., experienced legal editor with over 15 years of experience in publishing legal scholarship and analysis for the ABA Journal.
Keywords: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges political party, judicial appointments, partisan influence, judicial ideology, Ninth Circuit, appellate courts, political affiliation, judicial nominations, presidential appointments, Senate confirmation, legal scholarship
Introduction: Understanding the Political Landscape of the 9th Circuit
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, encompassing nine western states, is the largest federal appellate court in the United States. Its judges, appointed for life, wield significant influence over the interpretation of federal law within its jurisdiction. The question of "9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges political party" is a crucial one, as it impacts perceptions of judicial impartiality and influences the court's decision-making processes. This article delves into the complexities of determining the political party affiliation of these judges and the methodologies employed to analyze its effects.
Methodologies for Assessing Political Party Affiliation
Determining the political party affiliation of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges is not always straightforward. While the president nominating a judge typically considers their political affiliation, the process is not explicitly based solely on party loyalty. Several methodologies can be employed to ascertain this affiliation:
1. Presidential Nomination: The most direct indicator is the president who nominated the judge. Republican presidents generally nominate judges perceived as ideologically conservative, while Democratic presidents tend to nominate judges seen as liberal or moderate. However, exceptions exist, and a judge's record may deviate from the expected alignment.
2. Senate Confirmation Hearings: The Senate confirmation process offers valuable insights. During hearings, senators often probe a nominee's judicial philosophy, past legal experiences, and political leanings. Analyzing these transcripts can provide clues about a judge's potential ideological alignment, even if not explicitly stated as a partisan affiliation. The rhetoric surrounding the nomination itself often reflects the perceived political leanings of the nominee. Analyzing the level of opposition or support can offer further indication.
3. Voting Records: The most robust approach involves meticulously analyzing the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges' voting records across a variety of cases. By examining their decisions on specific legal issues, researchers can identify patterns consistent with either liberal or conservative judicial philosophies. This method, while labor-intensive, offers a more objective assessment than relying solely on presidential nominations. Quantitative analysis of these voting patterns using statistical methods like factor analysis can help uncover underlying ideological dimensions.
4. Law Review Articles and Publications: Examining a judge's scholarly work, including law review articles and published opinions, can offer insights into their judicial philosophy and political perspectives. These publications often reflect the judge's underlying ideological viewpoints, providing further context for understanding their voting record.
5. Campaign Contributions and Political Activity: Although less direct, investigating judges' past campaign contributions (prior to appointment) and any involvement in political activities could indirectly reflect their political affiliations. However, this method should be used cautiously, as it could potentially introduce biases.
Analyzing the Impact of Political Party Affiliation
Even with various methodologies providing insight into the political party affiliation of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges, it’s critical to avoid oversimplification. A judge's rulings are influenced by numerous factors besides political affiliation, including legal precedent, their interpretation of the Constitution, and their personal judicial philosophies. While a judge's political leaning can predict tendencies in their voting patterns, it does not determine the outcome of every case.
Furthermore, the impact of "9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges political party" can manifest in different ways. For instance, judges with similar political backgrounds might still diverge on specific rulings due to differences in their judicial philosophies or interpretations of the law. Analyzing the degree of intra-party divergence is crucial for a nuanced understanding. Conversely, judges from different political parties might concur on particular issues, highlighting the complexities of judicial decision-making.
Case Studies and Empirical Evidence
Several empirical studies have examined the relationship between the political party affiliation of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges and their decision-making. These studies often employ quantitative methods to analyze large datasets of judicial opinions, identifying patterns and correlations between judge characteristics and case outcomes. The findings from these studies often highlight a correlation, but seldom a direct causation between political affiliation and specific rulings.
The Importance of Transparency and Public Accountability
The topic of "9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges political party" emphasizes the importance of transparency in judicial appointments and the public's right to access information about the judicial process. Understanding the potential influence of political affiliation allows for informed public discussion and promotes accountability within the judiciary.
Conclusion
Determining the political party affiliation of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges requires a multi-faceted approach combining various methodologies. While presidential nominations, Senate confirmation hearings, and voting records provide valuable clues, relying on a single method can be misleading. A comprehensive analysis necessitates examining multiple data points and accounting for the complexities of judicial decision-making. The influence of political affiliation on judicial rulings is a complex issue requiring careful consideration of various factors, and should not be oversimplified. Understanding this nuanced relationship contributes to a more informed discussion about the role of the judiciary in American society.
FAQs
1. How are 9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges appointed? Judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate.
2. What is the term length for a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals judge? Judges serve for life, unless they resign or are impeached.
3. Does the political party of a president significantly influence the appointments to the 9th Circuit? Yes, it is a significant factor, although not the sole determinant.
4. Are there any efforts to measure the ideological leanings of 9th Circuit judges objectively? Yes, scholars use quantitative methods like analyzing voting patterns on various cases.
5. How does the political composition of the 9th Circuit impact its decisions? It can influence the outcome of cases, though individual judicial philosophies also play a role.
6. What are the potential consequences of a heavily partisan 9th Circuit? It may lead to increased criticism of the court's decisions and raise concerns about impartiality.
7. What role does the American Bar Association play in the appointment process? The ABA provides ratings on judicial nominees, offering an independent assessment.
8. How can the public access information about the political affiliations and voting records of 9th Circuit judges? This information is available through public records and legal databases.
9. Are there any ongoing debates concerning the composition and influence of the 9th Circuit? Yes, the court’s size and perceived ideological leanings are subjects of ongoing political debate.
Related Articles:
1. The Impact of Presidential Appointments on the Ideological Balance of the 9th Circuit: An analysis of how presidential administrations have shaped the political makeup of the court over time.
2. Quantitative Analysis of 9th Circuit Voting Patterns and Judicial Ideology: A statistical study correlating voting patterns with ideological leanings.
3. Senate Confirmation Hearings and the 9th Circuit: A Case Study Analysis: A deep dive into specific confirmation hearings, examining the discourse surrounding judicial nominees' political views.
4. The Role of the ABA in Evaluating 9th Circuit Judicial Nominees: An examination of the ABA's rating system and its influence on the appointment process.
5. Public Perception of the 9th Circuit and its Political Composition: A study exploring public opinion and its connection to the perceived political bias of the court.
6. Comparing the 9th Circuit's Ideology to Other Federal Appellate Courts: A comparative analysis placing the 9th Circuit within the broader context of the federal judiciary.
7. The Influence of Campaign Contributions on Judicial Appointments to the 9th Circuit: An investigation into the potential influence of campaign finance on judicial selection.
8. Case Studies of Landmark 9th Circuit Decisions and their Political Context: Analysis of significant cases, exploring the interplay between judicial rulings and political dynamics.
9. The Debate over the Size and Jurisdiction of the 9th Circuit: A discussion of proposals to restructure the court and its implications.
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Arizona Politics and Government David R. Berman, 2024 In this new edition of Arizona Politics and Government, David R. Berman examines the continuity and changes in Arizona's political culture, constitutional foundations, geographical features, and changing social economic-political characteristics. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: California Criminal Law Practice , |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Code of Judicial Conduct for United States Judges American Bar Association, 1974 |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Code of Conduct for United States Judges Judicial Conference of the United States, 1993 |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: 9th Circuit News , 1979 |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Beyond Deportation Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia, 2015-06-02 The first book to comprehensively describe the history, theory, and application of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law When Beatles star John Lennon faced deportation from the U.S. in the 1970s, his lawyer Leon Wildes made a groundbreaking argument. He argued that Lennon should be granted “nonpriority” status pursuant to INS’s (now DHS’s) policy of prosecutorial discretion. In U.S. immigration law, the agency exercises prosecutorial discretion favorably when it refrains from enforcing the full scope of immigration law. A prosecutorial discretion grant is important to an agency seeking to focus its priorities on the “truly dangerous” in order to conserve resources and to bring compassion into immigration enforcement. The Lennon case marked the first moment that the immigration agency’s prosecutorial discretion policy became public knowledge. Today, the concept of prosecutorial discretion is more widely known in light of the Obama Administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA program, a record number of deportations and a stalemate in Congress to move immigration reform. Beyond Deportation is the first book to comprehensively describe the history, theory, and application of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law. It provides a rich history of the role of prosecutorial discretion in the immigration system and unveils the powerful role it plays in protecting individuals from deportation and saving the government resources. Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia draws on her years of experience as an immigration attorney, policy leader, and law professor to advocate for a bolder standard on prosecutorial discretion, greater mechanisms for accountability when such standards are ignored, improved transparency about the cases involving prosecutorial discretion, and recognition of “deferred action” in the law as a formal benefit. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: United States Attorneys' Manual United States. Department of Justice, 1985 |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Violence 101 Denis Wright, 2010-10-14 Fourteen year-old Hamish doesn't simply do terrible things, he is committed to the belief that violence is the solution to the obstacles in life. But Hamish is also extremely smart, and extremely self-aware. And he considers everyone around him-the other institutionalized boys, his teachers and wardens, the whole world-as sheep, blindly following society's rules, unaware of what really dictates our existence. Hamish's heroes, like Alexander the Great, understood that violence drives us all. Through mesmerizing journal entries, Violence 101 paints a disturbing yet utterly compelling picture of an extremely bright, extremely misguided adolescent who must navigate a world that encourages aggressive behavior at every turn, but then struggles to help a young man who doesn't know where to draw the line between appropriate and inappropriate behavior. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Open Judicial Politics Rorie Spill Solberg, Jennifer Segal Diascro, Eric Waltenburg, 2020 |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Confirmation Hearing on Federal Appointments United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary, 2003 |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: The Most Dangerous Branch David A. Kaplan, 2018-09-04 In the bestselling tradition of The Nine and The Brethren, The Most Dangerous Branch takes us inside the secret world of the Supreme Court. David A. Kaplan, the former legal affairs editor of Newsweek, shows how the justices subvert the role of the other branches of government—and how we’ve come to accept it at our peril. With the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court has never before been more central in American life. It is the nine justices who too often now decide the controversial issues of our time—from abortion and same-sex marriage, to gun control, campaign finance and voting rights. The Court is so crucial that many voters in 2016 made their choice based on whom they thought their presidential candidate would name to the Court. Donald Trump picked Neil Gorsuch—the key decision of his new administration. Brett Kavanaugh—replacing Kennedy—will be even more important, holding the swing vote over so much social policy. Is that really how democracy is supposed to work? Based on exclusive interviews with the justices and dozens of their law clerks, Kaplan provides fresh details about life behind the scenes at the Court—Clarence Thomas’s simmering rage, Antonin Scalia’s death, Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s celebrity, Breyer Bingo, the petty feuding between Gorsuch and the chief justice, and what John Roberts thinks of his critics. Kaplan presents a sweeping narrative of the justices’ aggrandizement of power over the decades—from Roe v. Wade to Bush v. Gore to Citizens United, to rulings during the 2017-18 term. But the arrogance of the Court isn’t partisan: Conservative and liberal justices alike are guilty of overreach. Challenging conventional wisdom about the Court’s transcendent power, The Most Dangerous Branch is sure to rile both sides of the political aisle. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Politics and Judgment in Federal District Courts C. K. Rowland, Robert A. Carp, 1996 A major empirical and theoretical work that has the potential for becoming a classic in the field. -- Sheldon Goldman, author of The Federal Courts as a Political System. This provocative theoretical approach should be of great interest to scholars and students of the federal bench. -- Elliott E. Slotnick, editor of Judicial Politics. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Structure and Internal Procedures United States. Commission on Revision of the Federal Court Appellate System, 1975 |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: 9th Circuit Update , 1986 |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court Richard H. Fallon, 2018-02-19 Legitimacy and judicial authority -- Constitutional meaning : original public meaning -- Constitutional meaning : varieties of history that matter -- Law in the Supreme Court : jurisprudential foundations -- Constitutional constraints -- Constitutional theory and its relation to constitutional practice -- Sociological, legal, and moral legitimacy : today and tomorrow |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: The Grasping Hand Ilya Somin, 2015-05-28 In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that the city of New London, Connecticut, could condemn fifteen residential properties in order to transfer them to a new private owner. Although the Fifth Amendment only permits the taking of private property for “public use,” the Court ruled that the transfer of condemned land to private parties for “economic development” is permitted by the Constitution—even if the government cannot prove that the expected development will ever actually happen. The Court’s decision in Kelo v. City of New London empowered the grasping hand of the state at the expense of the invisible hand of the market. In this detailed study of one of the most controversial Supreme Court cases in modern times, Ilya Somin argues that Kelo was a grave error. Economic development and “blight” condemnations are unconstitutional under both originalist and most “living constitution” theories of legal interpretation. They also victimize the poor and the politically weak for the benefit of powerful interest groups and often destroy more economic value than they create. Kelo itself exemplifies these patterns. The residents targeted for condemnation lacked the influence needed to combat the formidable government and corporate interests arrayed against them. Moreover, the city’s poorly conceived development plan ultimately failed: the condemned land lies empty to this day, occupied only by feral cats. The Supreme Court’s unpopular ruling triggered an unprecedented political reaction, with forty-five states passing new laws intended to limit the use of eminent domain. But many of the new laws impose few or no genuine constraints on takings. The Kelo backlash led to significant progress, but not nearly as much as it may have seemed. Despite its outcome, the closely divided 5-4 ruling shattered what many believed to be a consensus that virtually any condemnation qualifies as a public use under the Fifth Amendment. It also showed that there is widespread public opposition to eminent domain abuse. With controversy over takings sure to continue, The Grasping Hand offers the first book-length analysis of Kelo by a legal scholar, alongside a broader history of the dispute over public use and eminent domain and an evaluation of options for reform. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Courtiers of the Marble Palace Todd C. Peppers, 2006 Courtiers of the Marble Palace explores how law clerks are hired and utilized by United States Supreme Court justices. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Judging Statutes Robert A. Katzmann, 2014-08-14 In an ideal world, the laws of Congress--known as federal statutes--would always be clearly worded and easily understood by the judges tasked with interpreting them. But many laws feature ambiguous or even contradictory wording. How, then, should judges divine their meaning? Should they stick only to the text? To what degree, if any, should they consult aids beyond the statutes themselves? Are the purposes of lawmakers in writing law relevant? Some judges, such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, believe courts should look to the language of the statute and virtually nothing else. Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit respectfully disagrees. In Judging Statutes, Katzmann, who is a trained political scientist as well as a judge, argues that our constitutional system charges Congress with enacting laws; therefore, how Congress makes its purposes known through both the laws themselves and reliable accompanying materials should be respected. He looks at how the American government works, including how laws come to be and how various agencies construe legislation. He then explains the judicial process of interpreting and applying these laws through the demonstration of two interpretative approaches, purposivism (focusing on the purpose of a law) and textualism (focusing solely on the text of the written law). Katzmann draws from his experience to show how this process plays out in the real world, and concludes with some suggestions to promote understanding between the courts and Congress. When courts interpret the laws of Congress, they should be mindful of how Congress actually functions, how lawmakers signal the meaning of statutes, and what those legislators expect of courts construing their laws. The legislative record behind a law is in truth part of its foundation, and therefore merits consideration. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Picking Federal Judges Sheldon Goldman, 1999-09-01 How does a president choose the judges he appoints to the lower federal bench? In this analysis, a leading authority on lower federal court judicial selection tells the story of how nine presidents over a period of 56 years have chosen federal judges. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Portraits of Justice Trina E. Gray, 2003 This volume profiles all the people who have served as Wisconsin Supreme Court justices and includes an introduction by Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson summarizing the court's history and its vision for the future. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Sentencing Law and Policy Nora V. Demleitner, 2004 Four leading sentencing scholars have produced the first and only text with enough up-to-date material to support a full course or seminar on sentencing. Other texts offer only partial coverage or out-of-date examples. The chapters in Sentencing Law and Policy: Cases, Statutes, and Guidelines present examples from three distinct types of sentencing guideline-determinate, and capital. The materials draw on the full spectrum of legal institutions, from the U.S. Supreme Court To The state court level, with close consideration of the role of legislatures and sentencing commissions. The only current, full-course text on sentencing, this new title offers: an 'intuitive', conceptually-based organization that looks at the essential substantative components and procedural steps following the sequence of decisions that typically occurs in every criminal sentencing examples covering three distinct areas of sentencing, with chapter materials based on guideline-determinate, indeterminate, and capital sentencing materials from a range of institutions, including decision from the U.S. Supreme Court, state high courts, federal appellate courts, and some foreign jurisdictions - along with statutes and guideline provisions, and reports from various sentencing commissions and agencies in-text notes on sentencing policies that explain common practices in U.S. jurisdictions, then ask students to compare different institutional practices and consider the relationship between sentencing rules, politics, And The broader aims of criminal justice |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: The Conservative Assault on the Constitution Erwin Chemerinsky, 2010-09-28 Over the last few decades, the Supreme Court and the federal appellate courts have undergone a dramatic shift to the right, the result of a determined effort by right-wing lawmakers and presidents to reinterpret the Constitution by reshaping the judiciary. Conservative activist justices have narrowed the scope of the Constitution, denying its protections to millions of Americans, exactly as the lawmakers who appointed and confirmed these jurists intended. Basic long-standing principles of constitutional law have been overturned by the Rehnquist and Roberts courts. As distinguished law professor and constitutional expert Erwin Chemerinsky demonstrates in this invaluable book, these changes affect the lives of every American. As a result of political pressure from conservatives and a series of Supreme Court decisions, our public schools are increasingly separate and unequal, to the great disadvantage of poor and minority students. Right-wing politicians and justices are dismantling the wall separating church and state, allowing ever greater government support for religion. With the blessing of the Supreme Court, absurdly harsh sentences are being handed down to criminal defendants, such as life sentences for shoplifting and other petty offenses. Even in death penalty cases, defendants are being denied the right to competent counsel at trial, and as a result innocent people have been convicted and sentenced to death. Right-wing politicians complain that government is too big and intrusive while at the same time they are only too happy to insert the government into the most intimate aspects of the private lives of citizens when doing so conforms to conservative morality. Conservative activist judges say that the Constitution gives people an inherent right to own firearms but not to make their own medical decisions. In some states it is easier to buy an assault rifle than to obtain an abortion. Nowhere has the conservative assault on the Constitution been more visible or more successful than in redefining the role of the president. From Richard Nixon to George W. Bush, conservatives have sought to significantly increase presidential power. The result in recent years has been unprecedented abuses, including indefinite detentions, illegal surveillance, and torture of innocent people. Finally, access to the courts is being restricted by new rulings that deny legal protections to ordinary Americans. Fewer lawsuits alleging discrimination in employment are heard; fewer people are able to sue corporations or governments for injuries they have suffered; and even when these cases do go to trial, new restrictions limit damages that plaintiffs can collect. The first step in reclaiming the protections of the Constitution, says Chemerinsky, is to recognize that right-wing justices are imposing their personal prejudices, not making neutral decisions about the scope of the Constitution, as they claim, or following the original meaning of the Constitution. Only then do we stand a chance of reclaiming our constitutional liberties from a rigid ideological campaign that has transformed our courts and our laws. Only then can we return to a constitutional law that advances freedom and equality. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: The Fraternity John Fitzgerald Molloy, 2004-08-25 A former Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for Arizona discusses his part in what he considers collusion as a lawyer, including discussions of cases in which he was professionally involved, and argues that American lawyers and judges have acted jointly to make the legal system progressively require the work of legal professionals, an outcome that has become possible by sanctifying the Constitution in a way that allows them to paint opposition to their decisions as sacreligious. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Defining Drug Courts National Association of Drug Court Professionals. Drug Court Standards Committee, 1997 |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: The Federalist Papers Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Madison, 2018-08-20 Classic Books Library presents this brand new edition of “The Federalist Papers”, a collection of separate essays and articles compiled in 1788 by Alexander Hamilton. Following the United States Declaration of Independence in 1776, the governing doctrines and policies of the States lacked cohesion. “The Federalist”, as it was previously known, was constructed by American statesman Alexander Hamilton, and was intended to catalyse the ratification of the United States Constitution. Hamilton recruited fellow statesmen James Madison Jr., and John Jay to write papers for the compendium, and the three are known as some of the Founding Fathers of the United States. Alexander Hamilton (c. 1755–1804) was an American lawyer, journalist and highly influential government official. He also served as a Senior Officer in the Army between 1799-1800 and founded the Federalist Party, the system that governed the nation’s finances. His contributions to the Constitution and leadership made a significant and lasting impact on the early development of the nation of the United States. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Measuring Judicial Activism Stefanie Lindqquist, Frank Cross, 2009-04-23 'Measuring Judicial Activism' supplies empirical analysis to the widely discussed concept of judicial activism at the United States Supreme Court. The book seeks to move beyond more subjective debates by conceptualizing activism in non-ideological terms. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Legislation and Statutory Interpretation William N. Eskridge (Jr.), Philip P. Frickey, Elizabeth Garrett, 2006 Suitable for students or practitioners, this authoritative overview of the legislative process and statutory interpretation moves smoothly and understandably between the theoretical and the practical. It contains in-depth discussion of such topics as theories of legislation and representation, electoral and legislative structures, extrinsic sources for statutory interpretation, and substantive canons of statutory interpretation. Reap the benefits of the authors' experience, opinions, and insight and gain a working knowledge of the area. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: The Judical Branch Cambridge Educational (Firm), 2009-10-28 September 24th, 1789 - the First United States Congress establishes the basic structure of the Federal Judiciary. With this act, the American legal system becomes an entity entwined with our fundamental notions of democracy and fair government, equal in power and authority to the Executive and Legislative branches. This program guides viewers through the history of the Judiciary and illustrates how it works in theory and practice. Topics include the main purposes of the Judicial branch - specifically, interpreting the law, determining if laws are unconstitutional, and applying the law to individual cases; the various divisions and levels of courts, such as lower, appellate, and specialized courts; the unique powers of the Supreme Court; summaries of famous Supreme Court cases; and more. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Are Judges Political? Cass R. Sunstein, David Schkade, Lisa Ellman, 2007-02-01 Over the past two decades, the United States has seen an intense debate about the composition of the federal judiciary. Are judges activists? Should they stop legislating from the bench? Are they abusing their authority? Or are they protecting fundamental rights, in a way that is indispensable in a free society? Are Judges Political? cuts through the noise by looking at what judges actually do. Drawing on a unique data set consisting of thousands of judicial votes, Cass Sunstein and his colleagues analyze the influence of ideology on judicial voting, principally in the courts of appeal. They focus on two questions: Do judges appointed by Republican Presidents vote differently from Democratic appointees in ideologically contested cases? And do judges vote differently depending on the ideological leanings of the other judges hearing the same case? After examining votes on a broad range of issues--including abortion, affirmative action, and capital punishment--the authors do more than just confirm that Democratic and Republican appointees often vote in different ways. They inject precision into an all-too-often impressionistic debate by quantifying this effect and analyzing the conditions under which it holds. This approach sometimes generates surprising results: under certain conditions, for example, Democrat-appointed judges turn out to have more conservative voting patterns than Republican appointees. As a general rule, ideology should not and does not affect legal judgments. Frequently, the law is clear and judges simply implement it, whatever their political commitments. But what happens when the law is unclear? Are Judges Political? addresses this vital question. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Introduction to French Law E. Picard, G. Bermann, 2008-03-18 Introduction to French Law is a very practical book that makes clear sense out of the complex results of the complex bodies of law that govern the most important fields of law and legal practice in France today. Seventeen chapters, each written by a distinguished French legal scholar, cover the following field in substantive and procedural detail, with lucid explanations of French law in the fields such as Constitutional Law , European Union Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Law , Property Law , Intellectual Property Law , Contract Law , Tort Liability, Family Law, Inheritance Law , Civil Procedure, Company Law, Competition Law , Labour Law , Tax Law and. Private International Law |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: The Parties in Court Robert C. Wigton, 2013-12-11 American political parties have long existed in a gray area of constitutional law because of their uncertain status. Parties in this country are neither fully public nor fully private entities. This constitutional ambiguity has meant that political parties are considered private organizations for some purposes and public ones for others. This “public-private entity” problem has arisen in many different legal contexts over the years. However, given their case-by-case method of judicial review, courts have typically dealt with only very discrete parts of this larger problem. This work is an endeavor to describe and analyze the constitutional status of political parties in this country by synthesizing the best judicial and scholarly thinking on the subject. In the final chapter, I draw on these ideas to propose my own scheme for how political parties might be best accommodated in a democracy. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Manual of Model Criminal Jury Instructions Ninth Circuit Jury Instructions Committee, 2013-06-14 This Manual of Model Criminal Jury Instructions (Manual) has been prepared to help judges communicate more effectively with juries. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: The Tenth Justice Lincoln Caplan, 1987 Of all the nation's public officials, the Solicitor General is the only one required by statute to be learned in the law. Although he serves in the Department of Justice, he also has permanent chambers in the Supreme Court. The fact that he keeps offices at these two distinct institutions underscores his special role. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Official Manual of the State of Missouri Missouri. Office of the Secretary of State, 1989 |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: The Election Process Revisited Neal Avaliktos, 2004 Elections seem to be constantly being reformed be it electronic voting systems, soft money laws, internet voting ad nauseam. Reforms and changes are essential to both keep up with technology and to pretend that the playing field is level even though it is quite clear to seasoned observes that the so called reforms in most cases are only window dressing for preserving the overwhelming edge for incumbents and the super-wealthy. This new book presents detailed analyses of the latest reforms and laws. CONTENTS: Preface; Elections Reform: Overview and Issues (Kevin J. Coleman and Eric A. Fisher); Election Projections: First Amendment Issues (Henry Cohen); Election of the President and Vice-President by Congress: Contingent Election (Thomas H. Neale); Congressional Authority to Standardize National Election Procedures (Kenneth R. Thomas); Campaign Finance Reform: Constitutional Issues Raised by Disclosure Requirements (L. Paige Whitaker); Campaign Financing: Highlights and Chronology of Current Federal Law (Joseph E. Cantor); Campaign Finance Reform: A Legal Analysis of Issue and Express Advocacy (L. Paige Whitaker); Campaign Finance in the 2000 Federal Elections: Overview and Estimates |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Constitutional Issues Raised by Recent Campaign Finance Legislation Restricting Freedom of Speech United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on the Constitution, 2001 |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Record , 1997 |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Civil Appeals Michael Burton, 2011-12-01 Any practitioner faced with the decision as to whether to appeal, or who has questions arising at each stage, will benefit enormously from a book that examines the law, principles, procedures, and processes involved. This leading work has been updated and restructured, to ensure it provides guidance on the complete and complex process of making a civil appeal. Clearly written and cross referenced, the books UK/European coverage of appeals includes: -- District Judges to Circuit Judges in the County Court -- Masters and District Judges to High Court Judges -- Court of Appeal -- House of Lords -- Privy Council -- The European Court -- The European Court of Human Rights -- Administrative Law and Elections |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: Examples & Explanations for Remedies Richard L. Hasen, 2023-11-20 A favorite classroom prep tool of successful students that is often recommended by professors, the Examples & Explanations (E&E) series provides an alternative perspective to help you understand your casebook and in-class lectures. Each E&E offers hypothetical questions complemented by detailed explanations that allow you to test your knowledge of the topics in your courses and compare your own analysis. |
| 9th circuit court of appeals judges political party: The United States Government Manual , 1984 |
What do we call the “rd” in “3ʳᵈ” and the “th” in “9ᵗʰ”?
Aug 23, 2014 · @WS2 In speech, very nearly always. In writing, much less so. I think what may be going on is that one just assumes that “June 1” is pronounced “June First”, or “4 July” as …
Why doesn't "ninth" have an "e", like "ninety"?
Feb 25, 2017 · For instance in "The coronation of Edgar [the peaceful]" (a poem from the Anglo Saxon chronicles, composed at the end of the... 9th century) one can read: OE: Ond him …
How did "September" shift from 7th month to 9th month of a …
Oct 25, 2018 · According to the OED, the switch from month number 7 to 9 was made well before English was even a language: The ancient Roman calendar (dating from around the mid 8th …
Meaning of "by" when used with dates - inclusive or exclusive
Aug 28, 2014 · If, in a contract fr example, the text reads: "X has to finish the work by MM-DD-YYYY", does the "by" include the date or exclude it? In other words, will the work delivered on …
What does “rising senior” mean and what countries use it?
In my experience, in addition to high school 11th and 12th graders being called juniors and seniors, high school 9th graders and 10th graders (14-16 years old) are also known as …
meaning - How should "midnight on..." be interpreted? - English ...
Dec 9, 2010 · By most definitions, the date changes at midnight. That is, at the precise stroke of 12:00:00. That time, along with 12:00:00 noon, are technically neither AM or PM because AM …
“20th century” vs. “20ᵗʰ century” - English Language & Usage ...
To some extent, it depends on the font you are using and how accessible its special features are. If you can do full typesetting, then you probably want to make the th part look different from the …
punctuation - Use of "e.g." — are parentheses necessary? - English ...
Oct 21, 2012 · Is it appropriate to use "e.g." in a sentence without using parentheses? This administrative access control should provide visibility into access via multiple vectors (e.g. …
prepositions - 'Next Monday' or 'on next Monday'? - English …
Dec 2, 2011 · Both "next Monday" and "on next Monday" can be used, but they have slightly different connotations. Next Monday: This phrase is commonly used and means the Monday …
etymology - What comes after (Primary,unary),(secondary,binary ...
Jan 11, 2018 · 9th = nonary; 10th = denary; 12th = duodenary; 20th = vigenary. These come from the Latin roots. The -n-ones come as well from Latin but this time are distributive adjectives, …
What do we call the “rd” in “3ʳᵈ” and the “th” in “9ᵗʰ”?
Aug 23, 2014 · @WS2 In speech, very nearly always. In writing, much less so. I think what may be going on is that one just assumes that “June 1” is pronounced “June First”, or “4 July” as …
Why doesn't "ninth" have an "e", like "ninety"?
Feb 25, 2017 · For instance in "The coronation of Edgar [the peaceful]" (a poem from the Anglo Saxon chronicles, composed at the end of the... 9th century) one can read: OE: Ond him …
How did "September" shift from 7th month to 9th month of a …
Oct 25, 2018 · According to the OED, the switch from month number 7 to 9 was made well before English was even a language: The ancient Roman calendar (dating from around the mid 8th …
Meaning of "by" when used with dates - inclusive or exclusive
Aug 28, 2014 · If, in a contract fr example, the text reads: "X has to finish the work by MM-DD-YYYY", does the "by" include the date or exclude it? In other words, will the work delivered on …
What does “rising senior” mean and what countries use it?
In my experience, in addition to high school 11th and 12th graders being called juniors and seniors, high school 9th graders and 10th graders (14-16 years old) are also known as …
meaning - How should "midnight on..." be interpreted? - English ...
Dec 9, 2010 · By most definitions, the date changes at midnight. That is, at the precise stroke of 12:00:00. That time, along with 12:00:00 noon, are technically neither AM or PM because AM …
“20th century” vs. “20ᵗʰ century” - English Language & Usage ...
To some extent, it depends on the font you are using and how accessible its special features are. If you can do full typesetting, then you probably want to make the th part look different from the …
punctuation - Use of "e.g." — are parentheses necessary? - English ...
Oct 21, 2012 · Is it appropriate to use "e.g." in a sentence without using parentheses? This administrative access control should provide visibility into access via multiple vectors (e.g. …
prepositions - 'Next Monday' or 'on next Monday'? - English …
Dec 2, 2011 · Both "next Monday" and "on next Monday" can be used, but they have slightly different connotations. Next Monday: This phrase is commonly used and means the Monday …
etymology - What comes after (Primary,unary),(secondary,binary ...
Jan 11, 2018 · 9th = nonary; 10th = denary; 12th = duodenary; 20th = vigenary. These come from the Latin roots. The -n-ones come as well from Latin but this time are distributive adjectives, …
