Advertisement
# According to Economists: Economic Self-Interest – A Historical and Contemporary Analysis
Author: Dr. Anya Sharma, PhD in Economics, Professor of Behavioral Economics at the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Sharma has published extensively on the topics of behavioral economics, game theory, and the role of self-interest in economic decision-making. Her work has been featured in leading economic journals and she has consulted for several government agencies on policy matters related to economic incentives.
Publisher: Oxford University Press – A leading academic publisher with a long and established history of publishing high-quality research in economics and related social sciences. Their reputation ensures rigorous peer review and editorial standards, lending significant credibility to works they publish on topics like "according to economists, economic self-interest."
Editor: Dr. David Miller, PhD in Economics, former Chief Economist at the Bank of England. Dr. Miller’s extensive experience in policy-making and economic forecasting provides valuable context and ensures the article's relevance to real-world applications of the concept of economic self-interest.
Introduction: The Foundation of Economic Self-Interest
The concept of economic self-interest lies at the heart of many economic theories. According to economists, economic self-interest, often simplified as the pursuit of one's own benefit, is a fundamental driver of economic activity. This analysis will delve into the historical evolution of this concept, examine its implications for various economic models, and discuss its contemporary relevance, considering critiques and modern perspectives.
Historical Context: From Adam Smith to Behavioral Economics
The notion of economic self-interest has deep historical roots. Adam Smith, often considered the father of modern economics, in his seminal work The Wealth of Nations (1776), articulated the concept of the "invisible hand." This metaphor suggests that individuals pursuing their own self-interest, in a competitive market, unintentionally contribute to the overall well-being of society. This idea, while influential, was not without its critics even then. Early socialist thinkers, for example, vehemently challenged the notion that unchecked self-interest leads to optimal societal outcomes.
The classical and neoclassical schools of economic thought largely built upon Smith's framework, emphasizing rational choice theory and the assumption of individuals maximizing their utility (satisfaction). According to economists within these schools, understanding economic self-interest is crucial for predicting market behavior and designing effective economic policies.
However, the late 20th and early 21st centuries witnessed the rise of behavioral economics, a field that challenges the strict rationality assumptions of traditional economic models. Behavioral economists incorporate psychological insights into their analysis, acknowledging that individuals are not always perfectly rational and self-interested. According to economists working in this field, factors like altruism, fairness, and cognitive biases significantly impact decision-making, thus complicating the simple model of purely self-interested behavior.
The Implications of Economic Self-Interest for Economic Models
The assumption of economic self-interest is fundamental to many core economic models. For example, the model of supply and demand hinges on the idea that producers seek to maximize profits (self-interest) while consumers seek to maximize utility (also a form of self-interest). Similarly, game theory, a powerful tool in economics, often models strategic interactions between individuals, each assumed to be acting in their own self-interest. The concept of "Nash equilibrium," a central concept in game theory, describes a situation where no player can improve their outcome by unilaterally changing their strategy, given the strategies of other players – all operating from a baseline of self-interest.
However, according to economists, the simplistic application of the self-interest assumption can lead to inaccurate predictions. For example, in the case of public goods (like clean air or national defense), relying solely on self-interest can lead to underprovision, as individuals may "free-ride" on the contributions of others. This is where government intervention, based on a more nuanced understanding of human behavior, may be necessary.
Contemporary Relevance and Critiques
The relevance of economic self-interest in contemporary economics remains significant, albeit with important caveats. Globalization and the increasing interconnectedness of markets have highlighted the importance of understanding how self-interest operates at an international level. Furthermore, the ongoing debates surrounding issues like income inequality and climate change necessitate a careful consideration of how self-interested behavior interacts with broader societal goals.
Critiques of the self-interest assumption continue to be voiced. According to economists, some argue that overemphasis on self-interest leads to a neglect of ethical considerations and social responsibility. Others point to the limitations of rationality assumptions in explaining phenomena like charitable giving or cooperation in social dilemmas. The rise of social entrepreneurship and the growing awareness of corporate social responsibility demonstrate a shift away from a purely self-interested view of business.
Conclusion
According to economists, economic self-interest remains a powerful and important concept for understanding economic behavior. However, a simplistic application of this principle can lead to inaccurate predictions and flawed policy prescriptions. A more nuanced approach, incorporating insights from behavioral economics and acknowledging the complexities of human motivation, is crucial for developing effective economic models and policies that address the challenges of the 21st century. The ongoing dialogue regarding the role and limitations of self-interest is essential for advancing both economic theory and practice.
FAQs
1. Is altruism compatible with economic self-interest? While seemingly contradictory, altruism can be viewed as a form of self-interest if individuals derive utility from helping others. Behavioral economics incorporates these complexities.
2. How does economic self-interest affect market efficiency? Generally, it promotes efficiency, but market failures can arise when self-interest is not adequately constrained (e.g., monopolies, externalities).
3. What is the role of government in a system driven by self-interest? Governments play a crucial role in mitigating market failures and ensuring that the pursuit of self-interest doesn't lead to socially undesirable outcomes.
4. How does economic self-interest impact international trade? Nations often act in their own self-interest in trade negotiations, leading to both cooperation and conflict.
5. Does economic self-interest always lead to positive outcomes for society? No, it can lead to negative outcomes like environmental degradation, inequality, and market instability if not properly managed.
6. How does behavioral economics challenge the traditional view of economic self-interest? Behavioral economics shows that people are not always perfectly rational and self-interested, incorporating psychological factors into economic models.
7. What are some examples of market failures caused by unchecked self-interest? Monopolies, information asymmetry, and negative externalities like pollution are prime examples.
8. How can the concept of economic self-interest be applied to environmental policy? Incentives like carbon taxes can harness self-interest to encourage environmentally friendly behavior.
9. What are the ethical implications of solely focusing on economic self-interest? A focus solely on self-interest can lead to neglect of social justice, equity, and environmental sustainability.
Related Articles
1. "The Invisible Hand: Re-examining Adam Smith's Legacy": An article exploring the original context and modern interpretations of Adam Smith's concept of the invisible hand.
2. "Behavioral Economics: Insights into Irrational Decision-Making": A review of behavioral economics and its challenges to traditional economic models.
3. "Game Theory and Strategic Interactions: A Primer": An introduction to game theory and its use in modeling strategic interactions, often based on self-interest.
4. "Market Failures and the Role of Government Intervention": An analysis of various types of market failures and the justifications for government intervention.
5. "The Economics of Altruism and Charitable Giving": Examines the economic explanations for altruistic behavior, which seemingly contradicts the pure self-interest model.
6. "The Prisoner's Dilemma and the Limits of Self-Interest": An exploration of the famous Prisoner's Dilemma game, illustrating the potential conflicts between individual and collective rationality.
7. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Beyond Profit Maximization": Discusses the growing importance of corporate social responsibility and its implications for businesses.
8. "Income Inequality and its Impact on Economic Growth": Explores the link between income inequality and economic growth, considering the role of self-interested behavior.
9. "The Economics of Climate Change: Balancing Self-Interest and Collective Action": Analyzes the challenges of addressing climate change, highlighting the tensions between individual self-interest and collective action.
According to Economists, Economic Self-Interest: A Critical Analysis of its Impact on Current Trends
Author: Dr. Eleanor Vance, Professor of Economics, University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Vance specializes in behavioral economics and the impact of self-interest on market dynamics.
Publisher: Oxford University Press, a leading academic publisher with a long-standing reputation for rigorous scholarship in the social sciences.
Editor: Dr. David Miller, Senior Editor at Oxford University Press, specializing in economics and public policy. Dr. Miller has over 20 years experience editing scholarly works in these fields.
Keywords: According to economists, economic self-interest, behavioral economics, market efficiency, altruism, cooperation, game theory, social responsibility, economic policy, current trends.
Abstract: This article critically analyzes the cornerstone of classical and neoclassical economics: the assumption of economic self-interest. We examine how “according to economists, economic self-interest” shapes economic models and policies, exploring its strengths and weaknesses in light of contemporary trends such as rising inequality, climate change, and the growing importance of social responsibility. The analysis considers alternative perspectives, incorporating insights from behavioral economics and highlighting the limitations of a purely self-interest-driven model.
1. The Foundation of Economic Self-Interest
The assumption that individuals act in their own self-interest is a fundamental building block of many economic models. According to economists, economic self-interest, often defined as the pursuit of maximizing one's own utility or wealth, simplifies analysis and provides a powerful framework for understanding market behavior. This principle underpins concepts like supply and demand, rational choice theory, and the efficiency of competitive markets. Adam Smith's "invisible hand," for instance, suggests that individuals pursuing their self-interest unintentionally contribute to the overall welfare of society.
However, this seemingly simple premise has been subject to intense debate and scrutiny. While "according to economists, economic self-interest" provides a valuable starting point for understanding economic phenomena, its limitations become increasingly apparent when confronted with real-world complexities.
2. The Limitations of a Purely Self-Interest Model
The assumption of perfect rationality and unwavering self-interest often fails to capture the nuances of human behavior. Behavioral economics, a burgeoning field, challenges the traditional view by demonstrating that individuals are not always perfectly rational and that factors such as altruism, fairness, and social norms significantly influence decision-making. Experiments in game theory, for example, consistently show that individuals often cooperate even when strictly self-interested behavior would yield a higher payoff. This suggests that "according to economists, economic self-interest," while a useful simplification, is an incomplete explanation of human economic behavior.
Furthermore, the focus on individual self-interest can overlook systemic issues. The current levels of income inequality, for example, cannot be adequately explained solely by differences in individual effort and talent. Factors such as market power, regulatory capture, and historical injustices play a significant role. A model that solely relies on “according to economists, economic self-interest” fails to address these structural factors that perpetuate inequality.
3. The Impact on Current Trends
The dominance of the self-interest paradigm has had profound consequences for economic policies and societal outcomes. The deregulation of financial markets, for instance, was partly based on the belief that self-interested actors would act efficiently and responsibly. The 2008 financial crisis demonstrated the limitations of this assumption, highlighting the dangers of unchecked self-interest and the need for stronger regulatory frameworks.
Similarly, the ongoing climate crisis presents a stark challenge to the self-interest model. The pursuit of individual economic gain often comes at the expense of environmental sustainability. The collective action problem associated with climate change underscores the limitations of relying solely on individual self-interest to address global challenges that require coordinated action. Policies that incentivize sustainable behavior, such as carbon taxes or emissions trading schemes, recognize the limitations of relying solely on "according to economists, economic self-interest" to achieve collective good.
4. Beyond Self-Interest: Incorporating Social Responsibility
Recent years have witnessed a growing emphasis on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and stakeholder capitalism. These trends acknowledge that businesses have a responsibility to consider the impact of their actions on society and the environment, moving beyond a purely profit-maximizing approach. While the debate continues on whether CSR is genuinely altruistic or strategically motivated, its rise signals a growing recognition of the limitations of a solely self-interest-driven model. This shift suggests that "according to economists, economic self-interest," while a component of economic decision-making, cannot be the sole guiding principle.
5. The Role of Government Intervention
The limitations of relying solely on "according to economists, economic self-interest" necessitates a more nuanced role for government intervention. Market failures, such as externalities (like pollution) and information asymmetry, require regulatory mechanisms to ensure efficient and equitable outcomes. Policies aimed at promoting social welfare, such as progressive taxation, social safety nets, and investment in public goods, acknowledge that a purely self-interested market may not always lead to optimal social outcomes.
6. Conclusion
"According to economists, economic self-interest" remains a powerful and widely used concept in economic modeling. However, its limitations are becoming increasingly apparent in the face of contemporary challenges. A more comprehensive understanding of human behavior, incorporating factors such as altruism, fairness, and social norms, is essential for developing effective economic policies that address pressing social and environmental issues. A balanced approach, acknowledging the role of self-interest while also recognizing the importance of cooperation, social responsibility, and government intervention, is crucial for building a more sustainable and equitable future.
FAQs:
1. Is the assumption of economic self-interest always accurate? No, behavioral economics demonstrates that individuals are not always perfectly rational or purely self-interested. Altruism, fairness, and social norms play significant roles.
2. How does economic self-interest relate to market efficiency? While self-interest can drive efficiency in competitive markets, it can also lead to market failures if unchecked.
3. What are the ethical implications of relying solely on economic self-interest? A purely self-interested approach can lead to inequality, environmental damage, and social injustice.
4. How can we incorporate social responsibility into economic models? By incorporating factors beyond profit maximization, such as environmental sustainability and social impact.
5. What role does government play in mitigating the negative consequences of self-interest? Government intervention can regulate markets, provide social safety nets, and incentivize socially responsible behavior.
6. What is the difference between rational self-interest and irrational self-interest? Rational self-interest involves making optimal choices given available information, while irrational self-interest ignores relevant information or engages in self-destructive behaviors.
7. How does game theory challenge the assumption of pure self-interest? Game theory experiments often show cooperation even when purely self-interested behavior would be more beneficial.
8. Can economic self-interest explain the rise of income inequality? While self-interest plays a role, income inequality is also shaped by structural factors like market power and historical injustices.
9. What are some alternative models to the purely self-interest model? Behavioral economics, social economics, and institutional economics offer alternative frameworks that consider a wider range of human motivations.
Related Articles:
1. "The Limits of Self-Interest: Behavioral Economics and the Social Good": This article explores how behavioral economics challenges the traditional assumptions of rational self-interest and its implications for social policy.
2. "Corporate Social Responsibility: A Myth or a Movement?": An analysis of the motivations behind corporate social responsibility initiatives and their effectiveness in achieving positive social and environmental outcomes.
3. "The Invisible Hand and the Market Failures: A Critical Assessment": This article reviews Adam Smith's concept of the invisible hand and examines the situations where market mechanisms fail to achieve efficient outcomes.
4. "Game Theory and Cooperation: Beyond Self-Interest": An exploration of how game theory models demonstrate the prevalence of cooperation, even in situations where self-interest might seem dominant.
5. "Behavioral Economics: A New Perspective on Economic Decision-Making": An overview of the field of behavioral economics and its contributions to understanding human economic behavior.
6. "The Economics of Altruism: A Review of Empirical Evidence": A study investigating the economic significance of altruistic behavior and its impact on market outcomes.
7. "The Role of Government Intervention in Correcting Market Failures": An examination of the various ways in which governments can mitigate market failures resulting from unchecked self-interest.
8. "Income Inequality and the Limits of the Self-Interest Model": This article analyzes the role of self-interest in exacerbating income inequality and suggests alternative economic frameworks for addressing the issue.
9. "Sustainability and the Challenge to Economic Self-Interest": This article explores the tension between economic self-interest and environmental sustainability, suggesting policy solutions for reconciling the two.
| according to economists economic self interest: A Genealogy of Self-Interest in Economics Susumu Egashira, Masanori Taishido, D. Wade Hands, Uskali Mäki, 2021-01-29 This is the first book to describe the entire developmental history of the human aspects of economics. The issue of “self-interest” is discussed throughout, from pre-Adam Smith to contemporary neuroeconomics, representing a unique contribution to economics. Though the notion of self-interest has been interpreted in several ways by various schools of economics and economists since Smith first placed it at the heart of the field, this is the first book to focus on this important but overlooked topic. Traditionally, economic theory has presupposed that the core of human behavior is self-interest. Nevertheless, some economists, e.g. recent behavioral economists, have cast doubt on this “self-interested” explanation. Further, though many economists have agreed on the central role of self-interest in economic behavior, each economist’s positioning of self-interest in economic theory differs to some degree. This book helps to elucidate the position of self-interest in economic theory. Given its focus, it is a must-read companion, not only on the history of economic thought but also on economic theory. Furthermore, as today’s capitalism is increasingly causing people to wonder just where self-interest lies, it also appeals to general readers. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Economics Rules Dani Rodrik, 2015 A leading economist trains a lens on his own discipline to uncover when it fails and when it works. |
| according to economists economic self interest: "Are Economists Basically Immoral?" Paul T. Heyne, 2008 Art Economists Basically Immoral? and Other Essays on Economics, Ethics, and Religion is a collection of Heyne's essays focused on an issue that preoccupied him throughout his life and which concerns many free-market skeptics - namely, how to reconcile the apparent selfishness of a free-market economy with ethical behavior. Written with the nonexpert in mind, and in a highly engaging style, these essays will interest students of economics, professional economists with an interest in ethical and theological topics, and Christians who seek to explore economic issues.--BOOK JACKET. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Microeconomics in Context Neva Goodwin, Jonathan M. Harris, Julie A. Nelson, Brian Roach, Mariano Torras, 2015-12-07 Microeconomics in Context lays out the principles of microeconomics in a manner that is thorough, up to date, and relevant to students. Like its counterpart, Macroeconomics in Context, the book is uniquely attuned to economic realities. The in Context books offer affordability, accessible presentation, and engaging coverage of current policy issues from economic inequality and global climate change to taxes. Key features include: --Clear explanation of basic concepts and analytical tools, with advanced models presented in optional chapter appendices; --Presentation of policy issues in historical, institutional, social, political, and ethical context--an approach that fosters critical evaluation of the standard microeconomic models, such as welfare analysis, labor markets, and market competition; --A powerful graphical presentation of various measures of well-being in the United States, from income inequality and educational attainment to home prices; --Broad definition of well-being using both traditional economic metrics and factors such as environmental quality, health, equity, and political inclusion; --New chapters on the economics of the environment, taxes and tax policy, common property and public goods, and welfare analysis; --Expanded coverage of high-interest topics such as behavioral economics, labor markets, and healthcare; --Full complement of instructor and student support materials online, including test banks and grading through Canvas. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Economics of Good and Evil Tomas Sedlacek, 2011-07-01 Tomas Sedlacek has shaken the study of economics as few ever have. Named one of the Young Guns and one of the five hot minds in economics by the Yale Economic Review, he serves on the National Economic Council in Prague, where his provocative writing has achieved bestseller status. How has he done it? By arguing a simple, almost heretical proposition: economics is ultimately about good and evil. In The Economics of Good and Evil, Sedlacek radically rethinks his field, challenging our assumptions about the world. Economics is touted as a science, a value-free mathematical inquiry, he writes, but it's actually a cultural phenomenon, a product of our civilization. It began within philosophy--Adam Smith himself not only wrote The Wealth of Nations, but also The Theory of Moral Sentiments--and economics, as Sedlacek shows, is woven out of history, myth, religion, and ethics. Even the most sophisticated mathematical model, Sedlacek writes, is, de facto, a story, a parable, our effort to (rationally) grasp the world around us. Economics not only describes the world, but establishes normative standards, identifying ideal conditions. Science, he claims, is a system of beliefs to which we are committed. To grasp the beliefs underlying economics, he breaks out of the field's confines with a tour de force exploration of economic thinking, broadly defined, over the millennia. He ranges from the epic of Gilgamesh and the Old Testament to the emergence of Christianity, from Descartes and Adam Smith to the consumerism in Fight Club. Throughout, he asks searching meta-economic questions: What is the meaning and the point of economics? Can we do ethically all that we can do technically? Does it pay to be good? Placing the wisdom of philosophers and poets over strict mathematical models of human behavior, Sedlacek's groundbreaking work promises to change the way we calculate economic value. |
| according to economists economic self interest: General Theory Of Employment , Interest And Money John Maynard Keynes, 2016-04 John Maynard Keynes is the great British economist of the twentieth century whose hugely influential work The General Theory of Employment, Interest and * is undoubtedly the century's most important book on economics--strongly influencing economic theory and practice, particularly with regard to the role of government in stimulating and regulating a nation's economic life. Keynes's work has undergone significant revaluation in recent years, and Keynesian views which have been widely defended for so long are now perceived as at odds with Keynes's own thinking. Recent scholarship and research has demonstrated considerable rivalry and controversy concerning the proper interpretation of Keynes's works, such that recourse to the original text is all the more important. Although considered by a few critics that the sentence structures of the book are quite incomprehensible and almost unbearable to read, the book is an essential reading for all those who desire a basic education in economics. The key to understanding Keynes is the notion that at particular times in the business cycle, an economy can become over-productive (or under-consumptive) and thus, a vicious spiral is begun that results in massive layoffs and cuts in production as businesses attempt to equilibrate aggregate supply and demand. Thus, full employment is only one of many or multiple macro equilibria. If an economy reaches an underemployment equilibrium, something is necessary to boost or stimulate demand to produce full employment. This something could be business investment but because of the logic and individualist nature of investment decisions, it is unlikely to rapidly restore full employment. Keynes logically seizes upon the public budget and government expenditures as the quickest way to restore full employment. Borrowing the * to finance the deficit from private households and businesses is a quick, direct way to restore full employment while at the same time, redirecting or siphoning |
| according to economists economic self interest: Greed, Self-interest and the Shaping of Economics Rudi Verburg, 2018 Since 2008, profound questions have been asked about the driving forces and self-regulating potential of the economic system, political control and morality. With opinion turning against markets and self-interest, economists found themselves on the wrong side of the argument. This book explores how the past of economics can contribute to today's debates. The book considers how economics took shape as philosophers probed into the viability of commercial society and its potential to generate positive-sum outcomes. It explains how dreams of affluence, morality and happiness were built upon human greed and vanity. It covers the bumpy road of the construction and reconstruction of this dream, exploring the debate on the foundations, conditions and limitations of the idea of the social utility of greed and vanity. Revisiting this debate provides a rich source of ideas in rethinking economics and the basic beliefs concerning our economic system today. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Economic Point of View Israel M. Kirzner, 1960 |
| according to economists economic self interest: Advances in Behavioral Economics Colin F. Camerer, George Loewenstein, Matthew Rabin, 2004 Today, behavioral economics has become virtually mainstream. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Essential Economics Matthew Bishop, 2004-05-01 |
| according to economists economic self interest: An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations Adam Smith, 1822 |
| according to economists economic self interest: Narrative Economics Robert J. Shiller, 2020-09-01 From Nobel Prize–winning economist and New York Times bestselling author Robert Shiller, a groundbreaking account of how stories help drive economic events—and why financial panics can spread like epidemic viruses Stories people tell—about financial confidence or panic, housing booms, or Bitcoin—can go viral and powerfully affect economies, but such narratives have traditionally been ignored in economics and finance because they seem anecdotal and unscientific. In this groundbreaking book, Robert Shiller explains why we ignore these stories at our peril—and how we can begin to take them seriously. Using a rich array of examples and data, Shiller argues that studying popular stories that influence individual and collective economic behavior—what he calls narrative economics—may vastly improve our ability to predict, prepare for, and lessen the damage of financial crises and other major economic events. The result is nothing less than a new way to think about the economy, economic change, and economics. In a new preface, Shiller reflects on some of the challenges facing narrative economics, discusses the connection between disease epidemics and economic epidemics, and suggests why epidemiology may hold lessons for fighting economic contagions. |
| according to economists economic self interest: The Hesitant Hand Steven G. Medema, 2011-03-06 The author explores what has been perhaps the central controversy in modern economics from Adam Smith to today. He traces the theory of market failure from the 1840s through the 1950s and subsequent attacks on this view by the Chicago and Virginia schools. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Development as Freedom Amartya Sen, 2001-01-18 Amartya Sen is the most respected and well-known economist of his time. This book is a synthesis of his thought, viewing economic development as a means to extending freedoms rather than an end in itself. By widening his outlook to include poverty, tyranny, lack of opportunity, individual rights, and political structures, Professor Sen gives a stimulating and enlightening overview of the development process. His compassionate yet rigorous analysis will appeal to all those interested in the fate of the developing world, from general reader to specialist. |
| according to economists economic self interest: In the Wake of the Crisis Olivier Blanchard, David Romer, Michael Spence, Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2014-08-29 Prominent economists reconsider the fundamentals of economic policy for a post-crisis world. In 2011, the International Monetary Fund invited prominent economists and economic policymakers to consider the brave new world of the post-crisis global economy. The result is a book that captures the state of macroeconomic thinking at a transformational moment. The crisis and the weak recovery that has followed raise fundamental questions concerning macroeconomics and economic policy. These top economists discuss future directions for monetary policy, fiscal policy, financial regulation, capital-account management, growth strategies, the international monetary system, and the economic models that should underpin thinking about critical policy choices. Contributors Olivier Blanchard, Ricardo Caballero, Charles Collyns, Arminio Fraga, Már Guðmundsson, Sri Mulyani Indrawati, Otmar Issing, Olivier Jeanne, Rakesh Mohan, Maurice Obstfeld, José Antonio Ocampo, Guillermo Ortiz, Y. V. Reddy, Dani Rodrik, David Romer, Paul Romer, Andrew Sheng, Hyun Song Shin, Parthasarathi Shome, Robert Solow, Michael Spence, Joseph Stiglitz, Adair Turner |
| according to economists economic self interest: Wealth of Persons John McNerney, 2016 Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century initiated a great debate not just about inequality but also regarding the failures found in the economic models used by theoreticians and practitioners alike. Wealth of Persons offers a totally different perspective that challenges the very terms of the debate. The Great Recession reveals a great existential rift at the core of certain economic reflections, thereby showing the real crisis of the crisis of economics. In the human sciences we have created a kind of Tower of Babel where we cannot understand each other any longer. The breakdowns occur equally on the personal, social, political, and economic levels. There is a need for an about-face in method to restore harmony among dissociated disciplines. Wealth of Persons offers a key to such a restoration, applying insights and analysis taken from different economic scholars, schools of thought, philosophical traditions, various disciplines, and charismatic entrepreneurs. Wealth of Persons aims at recapturing an adequate understanding of the acting human person in the economic drama, one that measures up to the reality. The investigation is a passport allowing entry into the land of economic knowledge, properly unfolding the anthropological meaning of the free economy. John McNerney's Wealth of Persons is an amazing tour de force--his focus on the human person in economics not only opens up economics for the nonprofessional economist, it's a bracing exposition of the philosophy of the human person, all the more impressive when seen immersed in economic action. By focusing on the Austrian and the later Bologna schools' insistence on the role of the entrepreneur he critiques, on the one hand, an economy overfocused on profit and, on the other, Marx's (and later Piketty's) misreading of economics as a struggle between capital and labor. It should be required reading for all students (and teachers) of economics as well as of applied philosophical anthropology. --Brendan Purcell, Adjunct Professor at the School of Philosophy and Theology, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney This book is a welcome addition to the field of Catholic social teachings and more generally to the debate over the use of economics and its limits . . . The author aims to explain the 'crisis' in economics and in the economy without blaming the usual suspects, especially human greed. This research program is sorely needed, especially coming from someone outside of the field of economics. --Frederic Sautet, Associate Professor of Economics at the Catholic University of America McNerney . . . is not afraid to suggest that theological and metaphysical issues are needed to put the right limits on economics. And he shows how this might be done without undermining the integrity of the discipline itself--indeed, how such issues flow out of the discipline and its activities among real persons] acting together . . . What McNerney is really getting at is a placing of economics in its true place, with the realization that the acting person also has a transcendent destiny that is really why he is doing anything at all in the first place, as Augustine said. --Professor James V. Schall, Retired Professor of Political Philosophy in the Department of Government at Georgetown University John McNerney is head chaplain at University College Dublin. Author of John Paul II: Poet and Philosopher (2004), he is also an occasional lecturer to undergraduate and graduate students in the fields of business ethics and philosophy. He has given talks at various international conferences in North America, Europe, and Asia, and is a member of the national Economy of Communion commission in Ireland. |
| according to economists economic self interest: The Invisible Hook Peter Leeson, 2009-03-31 Pack your cutlass and blunderbuss--it's time to go a-pirating! The Invisible Hook takes readers inside the wily world of late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century pirates. With swashbuckling irreverence and devilish wit, Peter Leeson uncovers the hidden economics behind pirates' notorious, entertaining, and sometimes downright shocking behavior. Why did pirates fly flags of Skull & Bones? Why did they create a pirate code? Were pirates really ferocious madmen? And what made them so successful? The Invisible Hook uses economics to examine these and other infamous aspects of piracy. Leeson argues that the pirate customs we know and love resulted from pirates responding rationally to prevailing economic conditions in the pursuit of profits. The Invisible Hook looks at legendary pirate captains like Blackbeard, Black Bart Roberts, and Calico Jack Rackam, and shows how pirates' search for plunder led them to pioneer remarkable and forward-thinking practices. Pirates understood the advantages of constitutional democracy--a model they adopted more than fifty years before the United States did so. Pirates also initiated an early system of workers' compensation, regulated drinking and smoking, and in some cases practiced racial tolerance and equality. Leeson contends that pirates exemplified the virtues of vice--their self-seeking interests generated socially desirable effects and their greedy criminality secured social order. Pirates proved that anarchy could be organized. Revealing the democratic and economic forces propelling history's most colorful criminals, The Invisible Hook establishes pirates' trailblazing relevance to the contemporary world. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Beyond Self-Interest Jane J. Mansbridge, 1990-04-15 A dramatic transformation has begun in the way scholars think about human nature. Political scientists, psychologists, economists, and evolutionary biologists are beginning to reject the view that human affairs are shaped almost exclusively by self-interest—a view that came to dominate social science in the last three decades. In Beyond Self-Interest, leading social scientists argue for a view of individuals behavior and social organization that takes into account the powerful motivations of duty, love, and malevolence. Economists who go beyond economic man, psychologists who go beyond stimulus-response, evolutionary biologists who go beyond the selfish gene, and political scientists who go beyond the quest for power come together in this provocative and important manifesto. The essays trace, from the ancient Greeks to the present, the use of self-interest to explain political life. They investigate the differences between self-interest and the motivations of duty and love, showing how these motivations affect behavior in prisoners' dilemma interactions. They generate evolutionary models that explain how altruistic motivations escape extinction. They suggest ways to model within one individual the separate motivations of public spirit and self-interest, investigate public spirit and self-interest, investigate public spirit in citizen and legislative behavior, and demonstrate that the view of democracy in existing Constitutional interpretations is not based on self-interest. They advance both human evil and mothering as alternatives to self-interest, this last in a penetrating feminist critique of the contract model of human interaction. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Risk, Uncertainty and Profit Frank H. Knight, 2006-11-01 A timeless classic of economic theory that remains fascinating and pertinent today, this is Frank Knight's famous explanation of why perfect competition cannot eliminate profits, the important differences between risk and uncertainty, and the vital role of the entrepreneur in profitmaking. Based on Knight's PhD dissertation, this 1921 work, balancing theory with fact to come to stunning insights, is a distinct pleasure to read. FRANK H. KNIGHT (1885-1972) is considered by some the greatest American scholar of economics of the 20th century. An economics professor at the University of Chicago from 1927 until 1955, he was one of the founders of the Chicago school of economics, which influenced Milton Friedman and George Stigler. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Economics: The User's Guide Ha-Joon Chang, 2014-05-01 What is economics? What can - and can't - it explain about the world? Why does it matter? Ha-Joon Chang teaches economics at Cambridge University, and writes a column for the Guardian. The Observer called his book 23 Things They Don't Tell You About Capitalism, which was a no.1 bestseller, 'a witty and timely debunking of some of the biggest myths surrounding the global economy.' He won the Wassily Leontief Prize for advancing the frontiers of economic thought, and is a vocal critic of the failures of our current economic system. |
| according to economists economic self interest: The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money John Maynard Keynes, 1989 |
| according to economists economic self interest: Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy Daniel M. Hausman, Michael S. McPherson, 1996-03-28 Discusses how standard economics may be improved by an understanding of moral philosophy. |
| according to economists economic self interest: The Economics of Attention Richard A. Lanham, 2006-04-21 If economics is about the allocation of resources, then what is the most precious resource in our new information economy? Certainly not information, for we are drowning in it. No, what we are short of is the attention to make sense of that information. With all the verve and erudition that have established his earlier books as classics, Richard A. Lanham here traces our epochal move from an economy of things and objects to an economy of attention. According to Lanham, the central commodity in our new age of information is not stuff but style, for style is what competes for our attention amidst the din and deluge of new media. In such a world, intellectual property will become more central to the economy than real property, while the arts and letters will grow to be more crucial than engineering, the physical sciences, and indeed economics as conventionally practiced. For Lanham, the arts and letters are the disciplines that study how human attention is allocated and how cultural capital is created and traded. In an economy of attention, style and substance change places. The new attention economy, therefore, will anoint a new set of moguls in the business world—not the CEOs or fund managers of yesteryear, but new masters of attention with a grounding in the humanities and liberal arts. Lanham’s The Electronic Word was one of the earliest and most influential books on new electronic culture. The Economics of Attention builds on the best insights of that seminal book to map the new frontier that information technologies have created. |
| according to economists economic self interest: The Moral Economy Samuel Bowles, 2016-05-28 Should the idea of economic man—the amoral and self-interested Homo economicus—determine how we expect people to respond to monetary rewards, punishments, and other incentives? Samuel Bowles answers with a resounding “no.” Policies that follow from this paradigm, he shows, may “crowd out” ethical and generous motives and thus backfire. But incentives per se are not really the culprit. Bowles shows that crowding out occurs when the message conveyed by fines and rewards is that self-interest is expected, that the employer thinks the workforce is lazy, or that the citizen cannot otherwise be trusted to contribute to the public good. Using historical and recent case studies as well as behavioral experiments, Bowles shows how well-designed incentives can crowd in the civic motives on which good governance depends. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Economics in One Lesson Henry Hazlitt, 2010-08-11 With over a million copies sold, Economics in One Lesson is an essential guide to the basics of economic theory. A fundamental influence on modern libertarianism, Hazlitt defends capitalism and the free market from economic myths that persist to this day. Considered among the leading economic thinkers of the “Austrian School,” which includes Carl Menger, Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich (F.A.) Hayek, and others, Henry Hazlitt (1894-1993), was a libertarian philosopher, an economist, and a journalist. He was the founding vice-president of the Foundation for Economic Education and an early editor of The Freeman magazine, an influential libertarian publication. Hazlitt wrote Economics in One Lesson, his seminal work, in 1946. Concise and instructive, it is also deceptively prescient and far-reaching in its efforts to dissemble economic fallacies that are so prevalent they have almost become a new orthodoxy. Economic commentators across the political spectrum have credited Hazlitt with foreseeing the collapse of the global economy which occurred more than 50 years after the initial publication of Economics in One Lesson. Hazlitt’s focus on non-governmental solutions, strong — and strongly reasoned — anti-deficit position, and general emphasis on free markets, economic liberty of individuals, and the dangers of government intervention make Economics in One Lesson every bit as relevant and valuable today as it has been since publication. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Experiments in Economics Ananish Chaudhuri, 2008-11-19 This book provides an easy to follow guide to economic experiments and specifically those that explore notions of fairness, altruism and trust in economic transactions and how findings in the field can change the way we approach a variety of economic problems. |
| according to economists economic self interest: The Wealth of Nations Adam Smith, 2010-10-12 THE MOST INFLUENTIAL BOOK ON MODERN ECONOMICS The Wealth of Nations is an economics book like no other. First published in 1776, Adam Smith's groundbreaking theories provide a recipe for national prosperity that has not been bettered since. It assumes no prior knowledge of its subject, and over 200 years on, still provides valuable lessons on the fundamentals of economics. This keepsake edition is a selected abridgement of all five books, and includes an Introduction by Tom Butler-Bowdon, drawing out lessons for the contemporary reader, a Foreword from Eamonn Butler, Director of the Adam Smith Institute, and a Preface from Dr. Razeen Sally of the London School of Economics. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Finance & Development, September 2014 International Monetary Fund. External Relations Dept., 2014-08-25 This chapter discusses various past and future aspects of the global economy. There has been a huge transformation of the global economy in the last several years. Articles on the future of energy in the global economy by Jeffrey Ball and on measuring inequality by Jonathan Ostry and Andrew Berg are also illustrated. Since the 2008 global crisis, global economists must change the way they look at the world. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Adam's Fallacy Duncan K. Foley, 2009-06-30 This book could be called The Intelligent Person's Guide to Economics. The title expresses Duncan Foley's belief that economics at its most abstract and interesting level is a speculative philosophical discourse, not a deductive or inductive science. Adam's fallacy is the attempt to separate the economic sphere of life, in which the pursuit of self-interest is led by the invisible hand of the market to a socially beneficial outcome, from the rest of social life, in which the pursuit of self-interest is morally problematic and has to be weighed against other ends. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Why Nations Fail Daron Acemoglu, James A. Robinson, 2012-03-08 Shortlisted for the Financial Times and Goldman Sachs Business Book of the Year Award 2012. Why are some nations more prosperous than others? Why Nations Fail sets out to answer this question, with a compelling and elegantly argued new theory: that it is not down to climate, geography or culture, but because of institutions. Drawing on an extraordinary range of contemporary and historical examples, from ancient Rome through the Tudors to modern-day China, leading academics Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson show that to invest and prosper, people need to know that if they work hard, they can make money and actually keep it - and this means sound institutions that allow virtuous circles of innovation, expansion and peace. Based on fifteen years of research, and answering the competing arguments of authors ranging from Max Weber to Jeffrey Sachs and Jared Diamond, Acemoglu and Robinson step boldly into the territory of Francis Fukuyama and Ian Morris. They blend economics, politics, history and current affairs to provide a new, powerful and persuasive way of understanding wealth and poverty. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Economics for the Common Good Jean Tirole, 2019-05-14 When Jean Tirole won the 2014 Nobel Prize in Economics, he suddenly found himself being stopped in the street by complete strangers and asked to comment on issues of the day, no matter how distant from his own areas of research. His transformation from academic economist to public intellectual prompted him to reflect further on the role economists and their discipline play in society. The result is Economics for the Common Good, a passionate manifesto for a world in which economics, far from being a 'dismal science,' is a positive force for the common good. Economists are rewarded for writing technical papers in scholarly journals, not joining in public debates. But Tirole says we urgently need economists to engage with the many challenges facing society, helping to identify our key objectives and the tools needed to meet them. To show how economics can help us realize the common good, Tirole shares his insights on a broad array of questions affecting our everyday lives and the future of our society, including global warming, unemployment, the post-2008 global financial order, the euro crisis, the digital revolution, innovation, and the proper balance between the free market and regulation. Providing a rich account of how economics can benefit everyone, Economics for the Common Good sets a new agenda for the role of economics in society--Provided by publisher. |
| according to economists economic self interest: The Economist's View of the World Steven E. Rhoads, 1985-05-23 This book explains and assesses the ways in which micro, welfare and benefit-cost economists view the world of public policy. In general terms, microeconomic concepts and models can be seen to appear regularly in the work of political scientists, sociologists and psychologists. As a consequence, these and related concepts and models have now had sufficient time to influence strongly and to extend the range of policy options available to government departments. The central focus of this book is the 'cross-over' from economic modelling to policy implementation, which remains obscure and uncertain. The author outlines the importance of a wider knowledge of microeconomics for improving the effects and orientation of public policy. He also provides a critique of some basic economic assumptions, notably the 'consumer sovereignty principle'. Within this context the reader is in a better position to understand the 'marvellous insights and troubling blindnesses' of economists where often what is controversial politically is not so controversial among economists. |
| according to economists economic self interest: The Theory of Moral Sentiments Adam Smith (économiste), 1812 |
| according to economists economic self interest: Liberalism at Large Alexander Zevin, 2019-11-12 The path-breaking history of modern liberalism told through the pages of one of its most zealous supporters In this landmark book, Alexander Zevin looks at the development of modern liberalism by examining the long history of the Economist newspaper, which, since 1843, has been the most tireless—and internationally influential—champion of the liberal cause anywhere in the world. But what exactly is liberalism, and how has its message evolved? Liberalism at Large examines a political ideology on the move as it confronts the challenges that classical doctrine left unresolved: the rise of democracy, the expansion of empire, the ascendancy of high finance. Contact with such momentous forces was never going to leave the proponents of liberal values unchanged. Zevin holds a mirror to the politics—and personalities—of Economist editors past and present, from Victorian banker-essayists James Wilson and Walter Bagehot to latter-day eminences Bill Emmott and Zanny Minton Beddoes. Today, neither economic crisis at home nor permanent warfare abroad has dimmed the Economist’s belief in unfettered markets, limited government, and a free hand for the West. Confidante to the powerful, emissary for the financial sector, portal onto international affairs, the bestselling newsweekly shapes the world its readers—as well as everyone else—inhabit. This is the first critical biography of one of the architects of a liberal world order now under increasing strain. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Is Behavioral Economics Doomed? David K. Levine, 2012 In this book, David K. Levine questions the idea that behavioral economics is the answer to economic problems. He explores the successes and failures of contemporary economics both inside and outside the laboratory, and asks whether popular behavioral theories of psychological biases are solutions to the failures. The book not only provides an overview of popular behavioral theories and their history, but also gives the reader the tools for scrutinizing them. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Doughnut Economics Kate Raworth, 2018-03-08 Economics is the mother tongue of public policy. It dominates our decision-making for the future, guides multi-billion-dollar investments, and shapes our responses to climate change, inequality, and other environmental and social challenges that define our times. Pity then, or more like disaster, that its fundamental ideas are centuries out of date yet are still taught in college courses worldwide and still used to address critical issues in government and business alike. That’s why it is time, says renegade economist Kate Raworth, to revise our economic thinking for the 21st century. In Doughnut Economics, she sets out seven key ways to fundamentally reframe our understanding of what economics is and does. Along the way, she points out how we can break our addiction to growth; redesign money, finance, and business to be in service to people; and create economies that are regenerative and distributive by design. Named after the now-iconic “doughnut” image that Raworth first drew to depict a sweet spot of human prosperity (an image that appealed to the Occupy Movement, the United Nations, eco-activists, and business leaders alike), Doughnut Economics offers a radically new compass for guiding global development, government policy, and corporate strategy, and sets new standards for what economic success looks like. Raworth handpicks the best emergent ideas—from ecological, behavioral, feminist, and institutional economics to complexity thinking and Earth-systems science—to address this question: How can we turn economies that need to grow, whether or not they make us thrive, into economies that make us thrive, whether or not they grow? Simple, playful, and eloquent, Doughnut Economics offers game-changing analysis and inspiration for a new generation of economic thinkers. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Misbehaving Richard H. Thaler, 2015-05-07 RICHARD H. THALER: WINNER OF THE 2017 NOBEL PRIZE IN ECONOMICS Shortlisted for the Financial Times and McKinsey Business Book of the Year Award ECONOMIST, FINANCIAL TIMES and EVENING STANDARD books of the year From the renowned and entertaining behavioural economist and co-author of the seminal work Nudge, Misbehaving is an irreverent and enlightening look into human foibles. Traditional economics assumes that rational forces shape everything. Behavioural economics knows better. Richard Thaler has spent his career studying the notion that humans are central to the economy - and that we're error-prone individuals, not Spock-like automatons. Now behavioural economics is hugely influential, changing the way we think not just about money, but about ourselves, our world and all kinds of everyday decisions. Whether buying an alarm clock, selling football tickets, or applying for a mortgage, we all succumb to biases and make decisions that deviate from the standards of rationality assumed by economists. In other words, we misbehave. Dismissed at first by economists as an amusing sideshow, the study of human miscalculations and their effects on markets now drives efforts to make better decisions in our lives, our businesses, and our governments. Coupling recent discoveries in human psychology with a practical understanding of incentives and market behaviour, Thaler enlightens readers about how to make smarter decisions in an increasingly mystifying world. He reveals how behavioural economic analysis opens up new ways to look at everything from household finance to assigning faculty offices in a new building, to TV quiz shows, sports transfer seasons, and businesses like Uber. When economics meets psychology, the implications for individuals, managers and policy makers are both profound and entertaining. |
| according to economists economic self interest: The Economy The Core Team, 2022-07 A complete introduction to economics and the economy taught in undergraduate economics and masters courses in public policy. CORE's approach to teaching economics is student-centred and motivated by real-world problems and real-world data. The only introductory economics text to equip students to address today's pressing problems by mastering the conceptual and quantitative tools of contemporary economics. THE ECONOMY: is a new approach that integrates recent developments in economics including contract theory, strategic interaction, behavioural economics, and financial instability; challenges students to address inequality, climate change, economic instability, wealth creation and innovation, and other problems; provides a unified treatment of micro- and macroeconomics; motivates all models and concepts by evidence and real-world applications. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Economy, Society and Public Policy The Core Team, 2019 Economy, Society, and Public Policy is a new way to learn economics. It is designed specifically for students studying social sciences, public policy, business studies, engineering and other disciplines who want to understand how the economy works and how it can be made to work better. Topical policy problems are used to motivate learning of key concepts and methods of economics. It engages, challenges and empowers students, and will provide them with the tools to articulate reasoned views on pressing policy problems. This project is the result of a worldwide collaboration between researchers, educators, and students who are committed to bringing the socially relevant insights of economics to a broader audience.KEY FEATURESESPP does not teach microeconomics as a body of knowledge separate from macroeconomicsStudents begin their study of economics by understanding that the economy is situated within society and the biosphereStudents study problems of identifying causation, not just correlation, through the use of natural experiments, lab experiments, and other quantitative methodsSocial interactions, modelled using simple game theory, and incomplete information, modelled using a series of principal-agent problems, are introduced from the beginning. As a result, phenomena studied by the other social sciences such as social norms and the exercise of power play a roleThe insights of diverse schools of thought, from Marx and the classical economists to Hayek and Schumpeter, play an integral part in the bookThe way economists think about public policy is central to ESPP. This is introduced in Units 2 and 3, rather than later in the course. |
| according to economists economic self interest: Principles of Economics Libby Rittenberg, Timothy Tregarthen, 2011-07 |
ACCORDING | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
ACCORDING definition: 1. present participle of accord 2. to treat someone specially, usually by showing respect: . Learn more.
ACCORDING Synonyms: 81 Similar and Opposite Words - Merriam-Webster
Synonyms for ACCORDING: corresponding, coinciding, conforming, agreeing, fitting, consisting, checking, answering; Antonyms of ACCORDING: differing (from), disagreeing (with), …
According - definition of according by The Free Dictionary
Define according. according synonyms, according pronunciation, according translation, English dictionary definition of according. v. ac·cord·ed , ac·cord·ing , ac·cords v. tr. 1. To give or …
ACCORDING Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
According definition: agreeing.. See examples of ACCORDING used in a sentence.
What does according mean? - Definitions.net
According is typically used as a preposition to show a relationship or connection between two clauses, phrases, or ideas. It indicates a condition, reason, or consequence for something …
According Definition & Meaning - YourDictionary
Agreeing; in agreement or harmony; harmonious. This according voice of national wisdom. Present participle of accord. Mind and soul according well. - Alfred Tennyson. Consistently as; …
according to or according? - TextRanch
Oct 29, 2024 · Both 'according to' and 'according' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'According to' is used to introduce a source or reference, while 'according' is used as …
ACCORDING definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
5 meanings: 1. in proportion; in relation 2. on the report (of); as stated (by) 3. in conformity (with); in accordance (with).... Click for more definitions.
According - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms - Vocabulary.com
The term according to can be used to attribute something reported — according to the news, the airports are closed (even though according to your friend, they're still open). It also refers to …
According vs. Accordingly — What’s the Difference?
Apr 5, 2024 · Understanding the distinction between "according" and "accordingly" is crucial for clear and precise communication. "According" helps attribute ideas or facts to their sources, …
Suggested Answers to TYS 2011 A Level H2 Economics Essay …
Consumers and producers are generally assumed by economists to be motivated by self-interest. (a) Explain how, according to economists, the pursuit of self-interest can help to address the …
Chapter 5 Introduction to Macroeconomics 5.1 The Roots of ...
6) Classical economists believed that economic slowdowns are self-correcting. Answer: True False Diff: 1 Skill: F 5.2 Macroeconomic Concerns Multiple Choice Inflation is a(n) A . decrease …
Self—Knowledge and Self—Regulation: An Economic …
Self—Knowledge and Self—Regulation: An Economic Approach 1 Roland Bénabou 2 and Jean Tirole 3 Final version, April 2001 1 We are grateful for helpful comments to George Ainslie, …
Understanding of Trade - Social Economics Lab
However, people can also have broader social and economic concerns beyond their material self-interest, represented in the right part of Figure 2. They may care about the efficiency gains …
Why Don’t Trade Preferences Reflect Economic Self …
Jan 24, 2016 · economic self-interest. Each individual or group presumably wants the policy that would maximize their real income. To determine which policy would serve this goal, analysts …
ECONOMIC FLUCTUATIONS AND MACROECONOMIC …
thought, is the interest rates. 16. According to the classical economists, a sudden fall in investment spending would cause a fall in the interest rate, and the lower interest rate would …
The Quantum Enigma and Islamic Sciences of Nature: …
self-interest.1 But other economists during this period opposed that view, arguing * Assistant Professor of Islamic Economics, Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences, 45150 …
Adam Smith on Morality and Self- Interest - PhilArchive
motivations to self-interest, and all self-interest to the vice of selfishness. Smith is thus presented as promoting not even an amoral but an anti-moral economics, and one that is conveniently …
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IN CONTEXT - Boston University
According to the classical/Keynesian synthesis, in the short run we are in the ... How have economists traditionally defined “economic growth,” and how is that different from “living …
On self-interest and greed - Springer
assumption, it also questions the assumption of self-interest.11 Though it is absolutely correct that self-interest is not the only relevant motivational force, this reference to behavioural economics …
UNIT 4 CLASSICAL AND KEYNESIAN - eGyanKosh
of the invisible hand confined classical economists to the analysis of the behavior of economic agents; they failed to see any conflict between interest of economic agentsdan that of the …
CHAPTER What Is Economics? - Pearson
economic way of thinking Describe how economists go about their work as social scientists and policy advisers You are studying economics at a time when the world’s richest nations are …
Introduction to Choice Theory - Stanford University
Smith were trying to refine his ideas about how an economic system based on individual self-interest would work. Perhaps that project, too, could be advanced by developing an index of …
Embedded Economies, Democracy, and the Public Interest …
Economists, political analysts, and pundits have ana- ... Disembeddedness is rooted in the belief that the economic system operates according to universal, natural laws. However, a social …
Keynes and the Classical Economists: The Early Debate on …
quire the economic resources necessary to produce those goods and ser-vices. The owners of the economic resources are households, and they expect to be paid—in wages, rent, interest, …
SELF-INTEREST, IDEOLOGY, AND - JSTOR
self-interest, it seems clear that this is a case of ideology being opposed to self-interest. Similar arguments would apply whenever a person with income 12 Anthony Downs, An Economic …
Economic incentives and social preferences: substitutes or …
incentives affect behavior only by altering the economic costs and benefits of the targeted activities. But where the separability assumption does not hold social preferences may be …
Greed vs. Self-Interest: A Case Study of How Economists Can …
Oct 19, 2015 · Figure 3. Continuum from Self-Interest to Greed Self-interest should not be the sole motivation of a believer, but it is su)cient for this discussion that it is a valid and acceptable …
Policies Designed for Self-Interested Citizens May Undermine …
Evidence from Economic Experiments Samuel Bowles1,2 High-performance organizations and economies work on the basis not only of material interests but also of Adam Smith’s “moral …
Reading Adam Smith: Understanding the …
self-interest, and laissez-faire. However, this understanding of Smith is incorrect due to how the term “self-interest” was used by Smith in his time versus how the term is understood today. …
Bernard Mandeville as moralist and materialist - Daniel Luban
vice in this account of Mandeville’s scheme is greed (or, more neutrally, economic self-interest) and the public benefit is prosperity; understood in this way, positive and negative reactions to …
Rationality in Economics - Richard Normand Langlois
Self-interest The assumption of self-interest has come under intense criticism, traditionally from outside economics, although increasingly from within as well. The main line of criticism tends to …
History and Alternative Views of Macroeconomics - Fairfax …
Keynes, many economists had argued for using monetary expansion to fight economic down-turns—though others were fiercely opposed. Some economists had even argued that …
Realizing the Spirit and Impact of Adam Smith's Capitalism
I. Traditional economic interpretation of Adam Smith Traditional neoclassical economists commonly tout the beneficial effects of capitalism. Drawing on Adam Smith's classic argument …
KEY_Guided Notes - Market Economies
• gives economic freedoms, but regulations and _____ accompany those freedoms • has a _____ number of market economy features, but maintains strong command economy elements as …
Adam Smith on markets, competition and - JSTOR
free competition. Pursuing one's self-interest in a decentralised economy through a network of interdependent markets did not imply chaos and anarchy, as several econo mists and social …
Practice Problems: Chapter 17 Macroeconomics: Events and …
1. Classical economists focused mainly on: A) unemployment. B) the short run. C) the long run. D) government economic policy. 2. Because in the classical model of the price level, prices are …
Theory of Moral Sentiments and Wealth of Nations - JSTOR
which economic activities were imbedded. His spectatorial approach to moral formation supported his version of political economy by illuminating the role of prudential self-interest. Smith’s model …
What Is Political Economy? - Princeton University
Interest in the question of how politics affects economic outcomes may thus appear new to someone trained solely in modern neoclassical eco-nomics; in fact, it is not. One may want to …
Akratic Homo Economicus: Does the Neoclassical Economic …
have alternative uses.” This definition allowed economists to expand their grasp beyond discipline’s standard scope and promote interest in analysis of any type of behavior influenced …
Not-So-Rational: Reflections on the Homo Economicus
(here: self-interest; Heath, 2015). This simplistic understanding of human nature determines inferences on what is rational, normal and ethical for man to engage in. Acts dictated by self …
Distinguishing Self-interest from Greed 1 - WPMU DEV
behavior. In contrast, economic efficiency will NOT be optimal if self-interest is “unfettered,” or otherwise unconstrained by ethics. 8 I will refer hereafter to self-interest under ethical …
Ideology and the Limits of Self-Interest: System Justification ...
Jun 30, 2016 · ideology—concurred with orthodox economists that “economic interest could be taken as the fundamental motive in the social sciences” (p. 3). Marx did, after all, appeal …
Chapter 2: Thinking like an Economist Principles of Economics, …
Economic Advisers. 4. Why Economists’ Advice is Not Always Followed a. Mankiw, who was Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Bush, is way too kind. b. …
Public Choice – A Primer - Institute of Economic Affairs
The Institute of Economic Affairs 2 Lord North Street Westminster London sw1p 3lb ... Eamonn is author of books on the pioneering economists Milton Friedman, F. A. Hayek and Ludwig von …
UNIT 11: CLASSICAL THEORIES OF DEVELOPMENT - eGyanKosh
16.2 Adam Smith’s Theory of Economic Development 16.2.1 Assumptions 16.2.2 Main Features ... In furthering her own self interest she/he would also further the common good. In pursuance of …
How Humans Behave: Implications for Economics and …
assume that people are well-informed economic agents striving to maximize a set of consistent preferences, frequently produce patently faulty predictions. Attracted by recent work in …
george j. stigler, “the theory of economic regulation”
economic theory, but it also found support in what he considered to be an “illustra-tive” empirical analysis (p. 7). “The Theory of Economic Regulation” aimed to reshape economists’ thinking …
'The Improper Arts': Sex in Classical Political Economy - JSTOR
The reconciliation of religious virtue with economic self-interest was one of Adam Smith's greatest accomplishments. In the sphere of personal relation-ships, moral sentiments should prevail. In …
Self-Interest, Markets, and the Four Problems of Economic …
made in economic policy as we pursue the multiple goals implicit in economic activity. Some Recent Justifications of Self-interest and Markets The defense of self-interested action in …
UNIT 4 CLASSICAL AND KEYNESIAN - eGyanKosh
of the invisible hand confined classical economists to the analysis of the behavior of economic agents; they failed to see any conflict between interest of economic agentsdan that of the …
Chapter 1
decisions following only their own self-interest, economists will not need to think of the wealth and welfare of the country as a whole separately. But economists gradually discovered that they …
The Classics in Economic Sociology - Princeton University
The term “interest” was originally economic in nature (as in “rate of interest”) and can be found in such places as Roman law. During this early stage the term “interest” was restricted in …
Industry, Self-Interest, and Individual Preferences over Trade …
Apr 1, 2015 · Three Theories about Economic Self-Interest and Trade The Stolper-Samuelson theorem posits that an increase in the relative price of a product will increase the real returns to …
Behavioral Economics In Context - Boston University
1.2.2 Self-interest vs. Fairness ... increasing concern to economists. Inequality exists both on the macroeconomic scale, in terms of broad income and wealth inequality, as well as in terms of …
KEYNES AND THE CLASSICAL ECONOMISTS - Springer
Harrod protested that in accusing the classical economists, and Marshall in particular, of having promulgated a "senseless" theory of interest, Keynes was unjust. 4 To sustain his charge, …
A Survey of Economic Theories and Field Evidence on
economists are reluctant to accept that the self‐interest hypothesis has its limits, the bulk of empirical evidence on pro‐social behavior requires that theories explaining human behavior go …
Maximizing and Satisficing - Pomona
The teachings of Game Theory, a formal extension of Rational Economic Theory, show young economists that cooperative strategies are frequently dominated by other, ... According to …
What Is Keynesian Economics? - IMF
economic problems. Rather than seeing unbalanced government budgets as wrong, Keynes advocated so-called that act against the direction of the business cycle. For example, …
Conscious Capitalism vs. Rapacious Capitalism: Lessons from …
interest should be sacrificed. Adam Smith also stated in The Theory of Moral Sentiments that self-interest could have benevolence in it: How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are …
