Advertisement
A Ruling Untethered to the Law: When Judicial Decisions Override Legal Frameworks
Author: Professor Anya Sharma, PhD, JD, LLM – Professor of Constitutional Law at the University of California, Berkeley, specializing in judicial review and comparative constitutionalism. Professor Sharma has authored numerous publications on judicial independence and the limits of judicial power, including the acclaimed book "The Shadow of Discretion: Judicial Activism and the Rule of Law."
Keyword: a ruling untethered to the law
Abstract: This article examines the phenomenon of "a ruling untethered to the law," where judicial decisions appear to disregard established legal principles and precedents. It explores the challenges posed by such rulings to the rule of law, democratic accountability, and societal stability, while also acknowledging potential opportunities for legal evolution and social progress. The analysis considers both the theoretical underpinnings of judicial decision-making and practical implications across various legal systems.
Introduction: The Peril and Potential of Unmoored Judgments
The very foundation of a just and equitable society rests upon the principle of the rule of law. This principle dictates that all individuals and institutions, including the judiciary, are subject to and accountable under the law. Yet, instances where "a ruling untethered to the law" emerges challenge this fundamental principle. Such rulings, seemingly divorced from established legal frameworks, raise serious concerns about judicial overreach, undermining public trust and potentially leading to instability. However, paradoxically, some argue that such decisions, while seemingly defying established norms, can also pave the way for necessary legal reforms and social progress. This article delves into this complex dichotomy, examining the challenges and opportunities presented by rulings that appear to operate outside the constraints of existing legal structures.
Challenges of a Ruling Untethered to the Law
The most immediate and significant challenge posed by "a ruling untethered to the law" is the erosion of public trust in the judicial system. When courts consistently deliver rulings that appear arbitrary or politically motivated, rather than grounded in established legal principles, the legitimacy of the entire system is threatened. This can lead to increased public cynicism, a decline in respect for the law, and potentially even civil unrest.
Furthermore, a ruling untethered to the law directly undermines the principle of legal certainty. Predictability and consistency are crucial for individuals and businesses to operate effectively within a legal framework. When judicial decisions are unpredictable and seemingly arbitrary, it becomes difficult to plan for the future, invest, or engage in any activity requiring legal certainty. This uncertainty can stifle economic growth and hinder social progress.
The separation of powers is also critically affected. Judicial overreach, often manifested in rulings untethered to the law, can disrupt the balance between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. Legislatures may feel compelled to respond to such rulings with reactive legislation, potentially creating a cycle of legal instability and undermining the intended checks and balances of a democratic system.
Finally, such rulings can disproportionately impact marginalized communities. When legal frameworks are disregarded, there's a greater risk that decisions will reflect the biases and prejudices of the judges, further marginalizing already vulnerable groups.
Opportunities Presented by Seemingly Untethered Rulings
While the challenges associated with "a ruling untethered to the law" are significant, it is important to acknowledge that some such decisions can potentially contribute to legal evolution and social progress. These rulings may highlight gaps or inconsistencies within existing legal frameworks, prompting a necessary reassessment and reform. For example, a ruling that challenges outdated or discriminatory laws, even if seemingly outside the bounds of established precedent, may force a much-needed societal reckoning and legislative change.
Such rulings can also serve as a catalyst for broader public discourse on critical social and ethical issues. By challenging conventional legal interpretations, they can stimulate public debate and lead to a more nuanced understanding of the complexities of legal and social problems. This public engagement can ultimately contribute to more informed and just legal reforms.
The Role of Judicial Activism and Interpretation
The concept of "a ruling untethered to the law" often overlaps with discussions of judicial activism. While judicial activism, in itself, is not inherently negative, it becomes problematic when it leads to decisions that appear to disregard established legal principles. The line between legitimate judicial interpretation and unwarranted judicial activism can be blurry, making it crucial to analyze each case on its merits, considering the specific legal context and the judges' reasoning. Judicial interpretation, when performed responsibly, allows for the application of existing legal principles to new and evolving circumstances. However, when it veers into unconstrained activism, it undermines the very foundations of the rule of law.
Case Studies: Examples of Contentious Rulings
Examining specific case studies across various jurisdictions is crucial to understanding the complexities of rulings seemingly untethered to the law. These case studies can highlight the diverse contexts in which such rulings emerge and the varying impacts they have on society. Analyzing the reasoning behind these rulings, the legal precedents invoked (or disregarded), and the subsequent public and political reactions can offer valuable insights into the dynamics at play. (Specific examples could be inserted here, drawn from various legal systems, depending on the desired scope and focus of the article).
Safeguarding Against Untethered Rulings: Mechanisms for Accountability
To mitigate the risks associated with "a ruling untethered to the law," various mechanisms for judicial accountability are necessary. These include robust judicial review processes, transparent and accessible court procedures, and effective mechanisms for addressing judicial misconduct. Strengthening judicial education and training can also contribute to a more nuanced and legally sound approach to decision-making. Moreover, a vibrant and independent legal profession, capable of challenging questionable judicial decisions through appeals and public discourse, is essential. Finally, fostering a culture of open dialogue and engagement between the judiciary, the legislature, and the public can contribute to a more informed and responsible judicial system.
Conclusion
"A ruling untethered to the law" presents a complex dilemma, posing significant challenges to the rule of law while also potentially offering opportunities for legal and social progress. The potential for judicial overreach is a serious concern, necessitating mechanisms for accountability and checks on judicial power. However, a rigid adherence to precedent, without room for interpretation and adaptation, could stifle necessary legal and social reforms. A balanced approach, emphasizing judicial responsibility, transparency, and public engagement, is essential to navigate this complex terrain and ensure that the judiciary fulfills its role within a just and equitable society. Careful analysis of specific cases, coupled with a commitment to safeguarding the principles of the rule of law, is crucial to protecting the integrity of the legal system and promoting justice for all.
FAQs:
1. What is meant by a "ruling untethered to the law"? It refers to a judicial decision that appears to disregard established legal principles, precedents, and the existing legal framework.
2. What are the main challenges posed by such rulings? Erosion of public trust, lack of legal certainty, disruption of the separation of powers, and potential for bias against marginalized groups.
3. Are there any potential benefits to rulings that seem to ignore the law? Such rulings can highlight flaws in existing laws, stimulate public debate, and potentially lead to necessary legal reforms.
4. How can we differentiate between judicial activism and judicial overreach? The line is often blurry, but judicial activism is more about interpreting existing laws to address current issues, while overreach involves disregarding established legal principles altogether.
5. What mechanisms exist to address rulings perceived as "untethered to the law"? Appeals processes, judicial review, mechanisms for addressing judicial misconduct, and public scrutiny.
6. What role does public opinion play in assessing the legitimacy of such rulings? Public opinion can influence legislative responses and shape the overall perception of the judiciary's authority and legitimacy.
7. How can we improve judicial training to reduce the incidence of such rulings? Enhanced focus on legal reasoning, ethics, and awareness of societal impacts of judicial decisions.
8. What is the impact of "untethered rulings" on international law and comparative constitutionalism? These rulings can raise questions about the universality of legal principles and the legitimacy of different legal systems.
9. Can a ruling ever legitimately be considered "untethered to the law"? Potentially, in extraordinary circumstances where existing laws are demonstrably unjust or inadequate, but this should be the exception, not the rule.
Related Articles:
1. Judicial Activism and Constitutional Interpretation: Examines the theory and practice of judicial activism across different legal systems.
2. The Limits of Judicial Review: Explores the boundaries of judicial power and the checks and balances designed to prevent judicial overreach.
3. Public Trust in the Judiciary: Analyzes the factors that contribute to, or erode, public confidence in the judicial system.
4. Legal Certainty and Economic Development: Investigates the link between predictable legal frameworks and economic growth.
5. The Role of the Legal Profession in Holding the Judiciary Accountable: Discusses the importance of a strong and independent legal profession in challenging questionable judicial decisions.
6. Comparative Analysis of Judicial Independence: Compares approaches to judicial independence across various countries and legal systems.
7. The Impact of Judicial Decisions on Marginalized Communities: Examines how judicial rulings disproportionately affect vulnerable populations.
8. The Ethics of Judicial Decision-Making: Explores the ethical considerations and principles that should guide judges in their decision-making processes.
9. Judicial Reform and the Rule of Law: Discusses strategies for improving the effectiveness and integrity of the judicial system.
Publisher: Oxford University Press – A prestigious academic publisher known for its rigorous peer-review process and high standards of scholarship in the fields of law, political science, and social sciences.
Editor: Dr. Elias Vance, PhD – Associate Editor at Oxford University Press, specializing in legal theory and jurisprudence. Dr. Vance has extensive experience in editing and publishing scholarly work in the field of law.
| a ruling untethered to the law: Why Didn't Evangelicals "See Him Coming"? Paul A. Pomerville, 2023-08-31 Why Didn’t Evangelicals “See Him Coming”? is a hard-hitting, clear-eyed account of how American society, the political establishment, and the rule of law reacted to a sociopath president. After Donald Trump left office, Americans didn’t “see him going” either. Trump came and went, yet millions of Americans were “clueless” about what happened because of his “gaslighting tornado.” An evangelical Christian author explains why Bible-believing, church-going, Jesus-talking, America-loving evangelicals, along with other Americans, listened to, were enamored by, and elected an immoral sociopath. An unlikely combination of viewpoints—psychology, law, and biblical theology—provide a surprising, coherent picture of how Donald Trump deceived and inflicted devastation on democracy. His uncanny influence is chronicled by media reporting during his four years in office and afterwards in a “shadow presidency” at Mar-a-Lago. If Trump succeeded in anything, it was deceit. Psychologists rightly attribute this to his “gaslighting”; biblical theology probes deeper, to his corrupt human nature. An FBI search warrant at Mar-a-Lago revealed the inevitable truth: Donald Trump was a thief and traitor from the beginning; the law finally caught up with a long overdue, unaccountable serial criminal for crimes that America would not tolerate. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Where Law Ends Andrew Weissmann, 2020-09-29 NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • In the first and only inside account of the Mueller investigation, one of the special counsel’s most trusted prosecutors breaks his silence on the team’s history-making search for the truth, their painstaking deliberations and costly mistakes, and Trump’s unprecedented efforts to stifle their report. “Weissmann delivers the kind of forceful, ringing indictment that Mueller’s report did not.”—The New York Times In May 2017, Robert Mueller was tapped to lead an inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, coordination by foreign agents with Donald Trump’s campaign, and obstruction of justice by the president. Mueller assembled a “dream team” of top prosecutors, and for the next twenty-two months, the investigation was a black box and the subject of endless anticipation and speculation—until April 2019, when the special counsel’s report was released. In Where Law Ends, legendary prosecutor Andrew Weissmann—a key player in the Special Counsel’s Office—finally pulls back the curtain to reveal exactly what went on inside the investigation, including the heated debates, painful deliberations, and mistakes of the team—not to mention the external efforts by the president and Attorney General William Barr to manipulate the investigation to their political ends. Weissmann puts the reader in the room as Mueller’s team made their most consequential decisions, such as whether to subpoena the president, whether to conduct a full financial investigation of Trump, and whether to explicitly recommend obstruction charges against him. Weissmann also details for the first time the debilitating effects that President Trump himself had on the investigation, through his dangling of pardons and his constant threats to shut down the inquiry and fire Mueller, which left the team racing against the clock and essentially fighting with one hand tied behind their backs. In Where Law Ends, Weissmann conjures the camaraderie and esprit de corps of the investigative units led by the enigmatic Mueller, a distinguished public servant who is revealed here, in a way we have never seen him before, as a manager, a colleague, and a very human presence. Weissmann is as candid about the team’s mistakes as he is about its successes, and is committed to accurately documenting the historic investigation for future generations to assess and learn from. Ultimately, Where Law Ends is a story about a team of public servants, dedicated to the rule of law, tasked with investigating a president who did everything he could to stand in their way. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Asian Discourses of Rule of Law Randall P. Peerenboom, 2004 Rule of law, one of the pillars of the modern world, has emerged in Western liberal democracies. This book considers how rule of law is viewed and implemented in the different cultural, economic and political context of Asia. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Elegant Legal Writing Ryan Patrick McCarl, 2024 Elegant Legal Writing provides short, practical tips to help attorneys make their writing as clear and readable as possible, reducing the reader's cognitive burden so they can focus on your argument-- |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Medieval Legal and Political Thought Larry May, 2021-12-13 Medieval legal and political thought encompasses the period from approximately 500 CE to 1500 CE. The term “Medieval” refers to the legal and political thought from the time of the late Roman Empire to that of the Renaissance. The legal and political thought of the Middle Ages is overwhelmingly characterized by the increasing role that religion played in influencing politics and law. By the high Middle Ages, we find the great theorists, Averroes, Maimonides, and Aquinas linking law to their respective religions of Islam, Judaism, and Christianity. This book argues that the so-called Dark Ages had very significant ideas about the law, especially how violence is to be contained, which make this early Medieval period anything but “Dark.” It suggests that the Christianization and Islamization of legal and political thought created almost as many problems as solutions to the increasingly diverse times that arose in the middle of the Middle Ages. The book also shows that the late Middle Ages already held many of the most important legal and political ideas of the Renaissance–showing that there was no clear break from the Medieval to the Modern periods of legal and political thought. Of central importance is the way that the development of the idea of conscience made the natural law theories of the Medieval times a robust set of ideas that is still felt quite strongly today. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Legal Fictions in International Law Reece Lewis, 2021-06-25 This innovative book extensively probes and reveals the existence of legal fictions in international law, developing a theory of their effectiveness and legitimacy. Reece Lewis argues that, since legal fictions exist in all systems and types of law, international law is no different and deserves discrete, detailed examination. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Lawless Capitalism Steven A. Ramirez, 2012-12-03 In this innovative and exhaustive study, Steven A. Ramirez posits that the subprime mortgage crisis, as well as the global macroeconomic catastrophe it spawned, is traceable to a gross failure of law. The rule of law must appropriately channel and constrain the exercise of economic and political power. Used effectively, it ensures that economic opportunity isn’t limited to a small group of elites that enjoy growth at the expense of many, particularly those in vulnerable economic situations. In Lawless Capitalism, Ramirez calls for the rule of law to displace crony capitalism. Only through the rule of law, he argues, can capitalism be reconstructed. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Yale Law Journal: Volume 124, Number 7 - May 2015 Yale Law Journal, 2015-06-03 The contents of the May 2015 issue (Volume 124, Number 7) are: Articles • Defining and Punishing Offenses Under Treaties, Sarah H. Cleveland & William S. Dodge • Administrative Severability Clauses, Charles W. Tyler & E. Donald Elliott Notes • Class Ascertainability, Geoffrey C. Shaw • The Right To Be Rescued: Disability Justice in an Age of Disaster, Adrien A. Weibgen • Expanding Conscience, Shrinking Care: The Crisis in Access to Reproductive Care and the Affordable Care Act’s Nondiscrimination Mandate, Elizabeth B. Deutsch Features • Conscience Wars: Complicity-Based Conscience Claims in Religion and Politics, Douglas NeJaime & Reva B. Siegel • Legal Scholarship for Judges, Diane P. Wood Book Review • The Banality of Racial Inequality, Richard R.W. Brooks Comment • Federal Sentencing Error as Loss of Chance, Kate Huddleston Quality ebook formatting includes fully linked footnotes and an active Table of Contents (including linked Contents for all individual Articles, Notes, and Essays), proper Bluebook formatting, and active URLs in footnotes. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: China's Long March Toward Rule of Law Randall Peerenboom, 2002-09-26 China has enjoyed considerable economic growth in recent years in spite of an immature, albeit rapidly developing, legal system, a system whose nature, evolution and path of development have been poorly understood by scholars. Drawing on his legal and business experience in China as well as his academic background in the field, Peerenboom provides a detailed analysis of China's legal reforms. He argues that China is in transition from rule by law to a version of rule of law, though most likely not a liberal democratic version as found in economically advanced countries in the West. Maintaining that law plays a key role in China's economic growth, Peerenboom assesses reform proposals and makes his own recommendations. In addition to students and scholars of Chinese law, political science, sociology and economics, this will interest business professionals, policy advisors, and governmental and non-governmental agencies as well as comparative legal scholars and philosophers. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives Christian Dahlman, Eveline Feteris, 2012-09-14 This book offers its readers an overview of recent developments in the theory of legal argumentation written by representatives from various disciplines, including argumentation theory, philosophy of law, logic and artificial intelligence. It presents an overview of contributions representative of different academic and legal cultures, and different continents and countries. The book contains contributions on strategic maneuvering, argumentum ad absurdum, argumentum ad hominem, consequentialist argumentation, weighing and balancing, the relation between legal argumentation and truth, the distinction between the context of discovery and context of justification, and the role of constitutive and regulative rules in legal argumentation. It is based on a selection of papers that were presented in the special workshop on Legal Argumentation organized at the 25th IVR World Congress for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy held 15-20 August 2011 in Frankfurt, Germany. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Oligarchy in America Luke Winslow, 2024 A fascinating survey of the history of political and economic ideas in the US that have led to an increasingly entrenched ultra-rich class of oligarchs To an American, oligarchy is something that happens somewhere else. In Oligarchy in America, Luke Winslow reveals oligarchy's deep intellectual roots and alarming growth in America. The book provides conceptual tools the lack of which have prevented Americans from recognizing oligarchy at home. Winslow argues that generic labels like billionaires for a class of ultra-rich masks the pervasive structures that entrench their power. He introduces instead the concept of democratic oligarchy--an institutional arrangement in which the ultra-rich form a class consciously creating and leveraging state power to accumulate wealth. Like a master class in political ideas, Winslow traces the intellectual lineage of oligarchy in the US. His lively and compulsively readable survey examines key rhetorical sources such as Herbert Spencer, Andrew Carnegie, Friedrich Hayek, Lewis Powell, Milton Friedman, Charles Koch, Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, and others. Oligarchy in America maps the connective web of oligarchic ideas uniting these disparate figures. By offering a lucid framework through which to view oligarchic ideas ambient in American culture, Winslow makes a vital contribution to readers and scholars of communication and rhetorical studies, public address, economics, and political science. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Commoner Sense Patrick J. Fornari, 2014-03 In Commoner Sense, author Patrick J. Fornari, a no-nonsense average American working person, examines the United States' unique past, present, and possible future. Built on more than a decade of research condensed into an overview of the working person's role in America, Fornari's perspective lends credibility, importance, and a clear voice to the diminishing role of the American voter and worker in American politics. Commoner Sense addresses a variety of topics including slavery and racism, religious freedom, liberal utopian sensibility, American exceptionalism, the IRS, the economy, and Obamacare. It presents the ideas of our founding fathers, shows how those ideas are playing out in today's America, looks toward the future, and encourages each American to regain control of the country's destiny, which has been hijacked by an elite ruling class. Fornari's everyman life experience represents the much-neglected commonsense view of the government and country by America's working class. He details how life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness isn't just for the history books anymore; it's for the present and the future. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance Jeffrey Neil Gordon, Wolf-Georg Ringe, 2018 Corporate law and corporate governance have been at the forefront of regulatory activities across the world for several decades now, and are subject to increasing public attention following the Global Financial Crisis of 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance provides the global framework necessary to understand the aims and methods of legal research in this field. Written by leading scholars from around the world, the Handbook contains a rich variety of chapters that provide a comparative and functional overview of corporate governance. It opens with the central theoretical approaches and methodologies in corporate law scholarship in Part I, before examining core substantive topics in corporate law, including shareholder rights, takeovers and restructuring, and minority rights in Part II. Part III focuses on new challenges in the field, including conflicts between Western and Asian corporate governance environments, the rise of foreign ownership, and emerging markets. Enforcement issues are covered in Part IV, and Part V takes a broader approach, examining those areas of law and finance that are interwoven with corporate governance, including insolvency, taxation, and securities law as well as financial regulation. The Handbook is a comprehensive, interdisciplinary resource placing corporate law and governance in its wider context, and is essential reading for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers in the field. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Hope in a Secular Age David Newheiser, 2019-12-19 Uses premodern theology and postmodern theory to show the endurance of religious and political commitments through the practice of hope. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Advanced Introduction to Substantive Criminal Law Stephen J. Morse, 2023-06-01 This Advanced Introduction to Substantive Criminal Law explores the doctrines, issues and controversies in the substantive field of criminal law. Chapters cover important theoretical and doctrinal topics, including the justifications for state blame and punishment, the foundations for criminalization, the prima facie case, affirmative defences of justification and excuse, and sentencing. Stephen J. Morse uses copious concrete examples drawn from cases, statutes and extended case studies, including the intricate grading of homicide, to enliven the discussion. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Ethics at 3:AM Richard Marshall, 2017 3AM magazine follows up their 2014 publication Philosophy at 3AM: Questions and Answers with a new collection interviews, this time focused on ethics. Interviewer Richard Marhsall presents 26 interviews, balanced both in terms of specialty, gender, and seniority, so that the result is a balanced and engaging portrait of the state of the art in ethics today |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Mere Natural Law Hadley Arkes, 2023-05-02 Hadley Arkes, groundbreaking legal philosopher and acolyte of legendary political thinker Leo Strauss, takes a sledgehammer to both legal relativism and originalism, arguing that the principles the Founders embodied in the U.S. Constitution are built in to the general human condition, and that the path away from national dysfunction and ruin lies in reinvigorating our understanding of these innate moral principles and reapplying them to modern life. Mere Natural Law seeks to recover, for a new generation, the understanding of natural law that has never been learned by the lawyers and judges of our day. And it does that in part by returning to the American Founders, in their understanding of those axioms, or necessary truths, that form the moral ground of our law. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Public Finance and Parliamentary Constitutionalism Will Bateman, 2020-09-24 Explores financial aspects of constitutional government, focusing on central banking, sovereign borrowing, taxation and public expenditure. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Experts in Government Donald F. Kettl, 2024-01-31 From Caligula and the time of ancient Rome to the present, governments have relied on experts to manage public programs. But with that expertise has come power, and that power has long proven difficult to hold accountable. The tension between experts in the bureaucracy and the policy goals of elected officials, however, remains a point of often bitter tension. President Donald Trump labeled these experts as a 'deep state' seeking to resist the policies he believed he was elected to pursue—and he developed a policy scheme to make it far easier to fire experts he deemed insufficiently loyal. The age-old battles between expertise and accountability have come to a sharp point, and resolving these tensions requires a fresh look at the rule of law to shape the role of experts in governance. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: The Language of Law and the Foundations of American Constitutionalism Gary L. McDowell, 2010-06-28 Argues that the Founders intended the Constitution to be interpreted according to the text's meaning and its framers' original intentions. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Law and Politics under the Abbasids Sohaira Z. M. Siddiqui, 2019-04-18 Explores the eleventh century Abbasid Empire and the intersection between politics, theology, and law in the thought of Abu Ma'ali al-Juwayni. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Casenote Legal Briefs for Criminal Procedure Keyed to Saltzberg and Capra , |
| a ruling untethered to the law: The Fourth Amendment Michael J. Z. Mannheimer, 2023-08-22 Police are required to obey the law. While that seems obvious, courts have lost track of that requirement due to misinterpreting the two constitutional provisions governing police conduct: the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Fourth Amendment forbids unreasonable searches and seizures and is the source of most constitutional constraints on policing. Although that provision technically applies only to the federal government, the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in the wake of the Civil War, has been deemed to apply the Fourth Amendment to the States. This book contends that the courts’ misinterpretation of these provisions has led them to hold federal and state law enforcement mistakenly to the same constitutional standards. The Fourth Amendment was originally understood as a federalism, or “states’ rights,” provision that, in effect, required federal agents to adhere to state law when searching or seizing. Thus, applying the same constraint to the States is impossible. Instead, the Fourteenth Amendment was originally understood in part as requiring that state officials (1) adhere to state law, (2) not discriminate, and (3) not be granted excessive discretion by legislators. These principles should guide judicial review of modern policing. Instead, constitutional constraints on policing are too strict and too forgiving at the same time. In this book, Michael J.Z. Mannheimer calls for a reimagination of what modern policing could look like based on the original understandings of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Contract Law and Social Morality Peter M. Gerhart, 2021-02-18 A concise and readable guide to reasoning about the source and content of contractual obligations when disagreements arise. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Sports Law and Regulation Matthew J. Mitten, Timothy Davis, N. Jeremi Duru, Barbara Osborne, 2023-11-09 Sports Law and Regulation provides a comprehensive and timely discussion of youth, high school, college, Olympic, and professional sports legal issues, including gender and racial equity, health, safety, risk management, and intellectual property law issues. A comprehensive collection of cases and materials provides balanced perspectives and flexible coverage, while the organization provides instructors the flexibility to cover selected sections or chapters for a separate course in either Amateur Sports Law or Professional Sports Law. Sports Law and Regulation contains the appropriate amount of introductory and explanatory materials, notes, and questions to facilitate students’ understanding as well as hypothetical problems for applying new knowledge. New to the 6th Edition: Updated cases regarding speech and religion at the high school level including Mahanoy Area Sch. Dist. v. B.L. and Kennedy v. Bremerton School District The new NCAA Constitution and governance structure, revised NCAA bylaws, transfer eligibility, NIL, agent interactions, and amendments to the NCAA’s enforcement and penalty structure, along with NCAA v. Alston An updated comment on concussions that includes recent cases, state legislation seeking to reduce the incidence of concussions, and settlements of concussion-related disputes between claimants and the NCAA, NFL, and NHL A streamlined coaching chapter including discussion of coaches’ involvement in the college admissions and basketball scandals and an updated coaching contract negotiation exercise Provisions of the NBA, WNBA, NFL, MLB, NHL, MLS, and NWSL collective bargaining agreements; updated league regulations regarding cannabis use; discussion of minor league baseball players’ unionization; and the 2019 revisions to the Uniform Athlete Agents Act and Williamson v. Prime Sports Mktg., LLC Revised Olympic and international sports law materials, including a recent CAS award interpreting the 2021 World Anti-Doping Code, a revised anti-doping problem, a CAS award regarding the legality of excluding Russian athletes from international sports events, and a Swiss Federal Tribunal case recognizing the independence of the CAS Anti-Doping Division Updated racial demographic data for coaching and administrative positions in collegiate and professional sport and discussion of coach Brian Flores’ historic racial discrimination lawsuit against the NFL and its clubs An updated gender equity chapter that includes new Title IX regulations, sexual orientation discrimination issues, the participation rights of transgender and intersex athletes and new Olympic and NCAA policies New commentary questioning the baseball rule as applied to absolve stadium owners of liability to spectators, and recent developments regarding the standards for assessing the liability of co-participants Professors and students will benefit from: Landmark historical cases and significant recent cases that reflect the current law regulating the sports industry Notes and Questions that suggest philosophical, sociological, psychological, and economic policy issues and themes Flexible organization that supports different teaching objectives, ranging from a focus on amateur sports to professional sports law Skill-building exercises in client counseling, negotiation, and contract drafting |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Confessions, Truth, and the Law Joseph D. Grano, 1993 An analysis of the Miranda decision and the rights of the accused in the criminal justice system |
| a ruling untethered to the law: The Myth of Mob Rule Lisa Lynn Miller, 2016 Drawing on a comparative case study of three countries--the U.S., the U.K. and the Netherlands--The Myth of Mob Rule explores when and with what consequences crime becomes a politically salient issue. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought Daniel Lee, 2016 Popular sovereignty - the doctrine that the public powers of state originate in a concessive grant of power from 'the people' - is perhaps the cardinal doctrine of modern constitutional theory, placing full constitutional authority in the people at large, rather than in the hands of judges, kings, or a political elite. Although its classic formulation is to be found in the major theoretical treatments of the modern state, such as in the treatises of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, this book explores the intellectual origins of this doctrine and investigates its chief source in late medieval and early modern thought. Long regarded the principal source for modern legal reasoning, Roman law had a profound impact on the major architects of popular sovereignty such as Francois Hotman, Jean Bodin, and Hugo Grotius. Adopting the juridical language of obligations, property, and personality as well as the model of the Roman constitution, these jurists crafted a uniform theory that located the right of sovereignty in the people at large as the legal owners of state authority. In recovering the origins of popular sovereignty, the book demonstrates the importance of the Roman law as a chief source of modern constitutional thought. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Health Care Law and Ethics Mark a Hall, Mary Anne Bobinski, David Orentlicher, I Glenn Cohen, Nicholas Bagley, Nadia N Sawicki, 2024-02-28 Buy a new version of this textbook and receive access to the Connected eBook on Casebook Connect, including lifetime access to the online ebook with highlight, annotation, and search capabilities. Access also includes an outline tool and other helpful resources. Connected eBooks provide what you need most to be successful in your law school classes. Health Care Law and Ethics, Tenth Edition offers a relationship-oriented approach to health law--covering the essentials, as well as cutting-edge and controversial subjects. The book provides thoughtful and teachable coverage of all major aspects of health care law, including medical liability. Current and classic cases build logically from the fundamentals of the patient/provider relationship to the role of government and institutions in health care. The book is adaptable to both survey courses and courses covering portions of the field. New to the Tenth Edition: Length: Trimmed by 20% to enhance teachability New author: Nadia N. Sawicki Thoroughly revised coverage of: Medical liability Reproductive rights and justice Public health law Extensive coverage of issues relating to COVID-19 Supreme Court decisions on abortion and the Affordable Care Act Discussion of emerging topics, such as: Gender reassignment Artificial intelligence Revising brain death and the dead donor rule for organ transplants Work requirements under Medicaid Medical price transparency Vertical integration and cross-market mergers Benefits for instructors and students: The organization vividly presents the entwined roles of patient, provider, and state in understanding and resolving private and public health care dilemmas Scope includes all major areas of health care law and policy Coverage of classic medical liability topics remains substantial Coverage of all major emerging and conventional issues in bioethics, public health, health care finance and reform, and corporate and regulatory law More streamlined editing facilitates coverage of multiple areas or use in survey courses The strength of the editors and the evolution of the book over a substantial period has allowed the book to become the best from which I have ever taught. Roy Spece, University of Arizona |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Human Rights and Humanitarian Intervention Elizabeth M. Bruch, 2016-05-12 Human rights, peacekeeping, and humanitarian intervention have emerged in the past decades as important components of international law and practice. Adopting a methodology of Institutional Ethnography informed by Actor-Network Theory, this book traces the practices of law and expertise from global IGO headquarters to the ‘field’ and back again, and through various contemporary field missions from Bosnia to Afghanistan and East Timor to Sierra Leone. It answers several fundamental questions: How is human rights law engaged in ‘establishing the peace,’ ‘rebuilding the nation,’ and ‘restoring the rule of law’ in post-conflict situations? How do human rights experts use law in their everyday work in the context of humanitarian intervention? How are law and expertise established, sustained and transformed in the field? Offering a complex and nuanced explanation of humanitarian intervention based upon a multi-dimensional understanding of law and power, this book will be of interest and use to scholars, students and practitioners in international law and policy, human rights, and humanitarian intervention. Its cross-disciplinary approach should also appeal to the professional communities engaged directly and indirectly with projects of humanitarian intervention – including staff at inter-governmental organizations, international lawyers and practitioners, and activists. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Progressive Constitutionalism Robin West, 1994 The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees all citizens equal protection under the law as well as immunity from laws that deprive them of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. In Progressive Constitutionalism, Robin West develops an interpretation of this amendment that contrasts with the views, conservative and liberal, of the Rehnquist, Burger, and Warren Courts, and with the radical antisubordinationist account provided by the critical legal studies movement and many prominent feminist and critical race theorists. Her interpretation consists of a substantive argument regarding the Amendment's core meaning, and a jurisprudential argument regarding the role of the courts and Congress in fulfilling the Amendment's progressive promise. West shows how the equal protection clause, far from insulating the private spheres of culture, market, and home life, as is commonly held, directly targets abuses of power within those spheres. She develops a number of arguments for the modern relevance of this understanding, from the failure of the state to provide equal protection against private domestic violence, permitting a private sovereignty of patriarchal power within the home, to the the state's failure to provide equal protection against material deprivation, allowing private sovereignty between economically privileged and desperate people in private markets. West's argument extends to the liberty prong of the due process clause, seen here as a protection of the positive, not negative, liberty of citizens, covering rights in such typically controversial areas as welfare, education, and domestic safety. This interpretation recasts a number of contemporary constitutional issues, such as affirmative action and hate speech, and points to very different problems--notably private, unchecked criminal violence and extreme economic deprivation--as the central constitutional dilemmas of our day. Progressive Constitutionalism urges a substantive, institutional, and jurisprudential reorientation of our understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment, one that would necessarily be pursued through Congressional rather than judicial channels. In doing so, with attention to history and both feminist and critical race scholarship, it should reinvigorate our politics and our constitutional conversations--and, perhaps, point us toward a more just society. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Congressional Record United States. Congress, 2009 The Congressional Record is the official record of the proceedings and debates of the United States Congress. It is published daily when Congress is in session. The Congressional Record began publication in 1873. Debates for sessions prior to 1873 are recorded in The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States (1789-1824), the Register of Debates in Congress (1824-1837), and the Congressional Globe (1833-1873) |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Saying what the Law is Charles Fried, 2005 Taking the reader up to and through such controversial Supreme Court decisions as the Texas sodomy case and the University of Michigan affirmative action case, Fried sets out to make sense of the main topics of constitutional law: the nature of doctrine, federalism, separation of powers, freedom of expression, religion, liberty, and equality. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Structures of Judicial Decision Making from Legal Formalism to Critical Theory Roy Lavon Brooks, 2005 To order a paperback version of this book, please click here. This is a general book on jurisprudence designed for both the novice and more experienced student, which makes it suitable for first-year law students. It is the first book to distinguish and connect traditional theories of judicial decision-making (e.g., legal formalism, textualism, legal realism, and legal process) with critical process (which is critical theory transformed from a theory of legal criticism into a theory of judicial decision-making). Brooks breaks new ground on several other fronts as well -- he employs an innovative framework that divides judicial decision-making models into the logical method and the policy method; offers a more nuanced conceptualization of judicial policy-formulation in which judges are seen as not only making policy, but also (and more typically) as discovering and vindicating policy; redefines policy-making in a manner that is different from our traditional understanding of the term; and synthesizes critical process into three judicial models: symmetrical, asymmetrical, and hybrid. The book is written in two parts. Part 1 (Traditional Process) discusses five major traditional judicial models, each reflective of either the logical method or the policy method. Part 1 ends with a synthesis of the traditional models (dividing them into three categories), which judges who have used the book find to be most useful. Part 2 (Critical Process) begins with a discussion of critical theory's central theme and operating elements and then transforms these features into a theory of outsider-oriented judicial decision making, something judges can actually use in deciding cases. Critical theory is thus transformed into critical process. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: The Public's Law Blake Emerson, 2019 The Public's Law is a theory and history of democracy in the American administrative state. The book describes how American Progressive thinkers - such as John Dewey, W.E.B. Du Bois, and Woodrow Wilson - developed a democratic understanding of the state from their study of Hegelian political thought. G.W.F. Hegel understood the state as an institution that regulated society in the interest of freedom. This normative account of the state distinguished his view from later German theorists, such as Max Weber, who adopted a technocratic conception of bureaucracy, and others, such as Carl Schmitt, who prioritized the will of the chief executive. The Progressives embraced Hegel's view of the connection between bureaucracy and freedom, but sought to democratize his concept of the state. They agreed that welfare services, economic regulation, and official discretion were needed to guarantee conditions for self-determination. But they stressed that the people should participate deeply in administrative policymaking. This Progressive ideal influenced administrative programs during the New Deal. It also sheds light on interventions in the War on Poverty and the Second Reconstruction, as well as on the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946. The book develops a normative theory of the state on the basis of this intellectual and institutional history, with implications for deliberative democratic theory, constitutional theory, and administrative law. On this view, the administrative state should provide regulation and social services through deliberative procedures, rather than hinge its legitimacy on presidential authority or economistic reasoning. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Sports Law Matthew J. Mitten, Timothy Davis, Barbara Osborne, N. Jeremi Duru, 2020-09-14 In Sports Law: Governance and Regulation, Third Edition four of the nation’s leading sports law scholars have merged their expertise to produce this problem-based sports law and governance text for undergraduate and graduate students. Drawing on the work they have done in developing the field’s leading sports law casebook for law students, they present this text in the traditional law school case method style, but with an eye toward accessibility for non-law students. Whether students are interested in careers in professional or amateur sports law, this text will equip them with the foundational knowledge necessary to identify legal issues, minimize risk, and become a generation of problem solvers within the sports industry. Contracts, torts, agency, labor and employment, racial and gender equity, antitrust, and intellectual property law are all addressed, as are health and safety issues and high school, college, and international/Olympic/regulatory concerns. Moreover, the text explores the sports industry with an appreciation of its dynamism, examining topics from cutting edge issues in athlete representation to the uncertain future of big-time intercollegiate athletics. Sports Law: Governance and Regulation, Third Edition is a must for undergraduate and graduate students interested in the sports industry. New to the Third Edition: Changes to the NCAA’s governance and enforcement structures, and updated bylaws and cases related to student-athlete scholarships, transfer rights, and name, image and likeness opportunities. Coverage regarding the minimizing of health and safety risks from youth through professional sport arising from concussions and the liability of various institutions for concussion-related injuries. New sections on sexual orientation discrimination, participation rights of transgender and intersex athletes, and the obligation of organizations to protect athletes from sexual misconduct. Professional sport developments regarding the appropriate breadth of commissioner authority, updated MLB, NBA, NFL, and NHL collective bargaining agreements, and an expanded discussion of professional sports leagues’ personal conduct, disciplinary issues, and domestic violence policies. Revised Olympic and international sports issues, including anti-doping, sports globalization, and athlete exploitation materials. A unique look at negotiating sport industry contracts, including coaches’ and players’ contracts. Professors and students will benefit from: Thorough coverage of professional and amateur sports covering contracts, torts, agency, labor, employment and health and safety law as well as regulation of high school, college and Olympic sport. Compelling explanatory text, notes, questions, and review problems to train students to identify and successfully navigate legal issues encountered in a career in sports. Well-edited cases to encourage critical thinking and discussion in the classroom. Definitions of key terms to aid in comprehension. Timely website sources that support further research and classroom discussion. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: The Assault on International Law Jens David Ohlin, 2015 Why comply with international law when there is no world government to enforce it? Jens David Ohlin provides an alternate vision of international law based on a truly innovative theory of human rationality. Rationality requires that agents follow through on their plans even when faced with opportunities for defection. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Law and Economics Aristides N. Hatzis, Nicholas Mercuro, 2015-02-11 The Law and Economics approach to law dominates the intellectual discussion of nearly every doctrinal area of law in the United States and its influence is growing steadily throughout Europe, Asia, and South America. Numerous academics and practitioners are working in the field with a flow of uninterrupted scholarship that is unprecedented, as is its influence on the law. Academically every major law school in the United States has a Law and Economics program and the emergence of similar programs on other continents continues to accelerate. Despite its phenomenal growth, the area is also the target of an ongoing critique by lawyers, philosophers, psychologists, social scientists, even economists since the late 1970s. While the critique did not seem to impede the development of the field, it certainly has helped it to become more sophisticated, inclusive, and mature. In this volume some of the leading scholars working in the field, as well as a number of those critical of Law and Economics, discuss the foundational issues from various perspectives: philosophical, moral, epistemological, methodological, psychological, political, legal, and social. The philosophical and methodological assumptions of the economic analysis of law are criticized and defended, alternatives are proposed, old and new applications are discussed. The book is ideal for a main or supplementary textbook in courses and seminars on legal theory, philosophy of law, jurisprudence, and (of course) Law and Economics. |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Minnesota Law Review , 1997 |
| a ruling untethered to the law: Political Theology of International Order William Bain, 2020-04-09 Is contemporary international order truly a secular arrangement? Theorists of international relations typically adhere to a narrative that portrays the modern states system as the product of a gradual process of secularization that transcended the religiosity of medieval Christendom. William Bain challenges this narrative by arguing that modern theories of international order reflect ideas that originate in medieval theology. They are, in other words, worldly applications of a theological pattern. This ground-breaking book makes two key contributions to scholarship on international order. First, it provides a thorough intellectual history of medieval and early modern traditions of thought and the way in which they shape modern thinking about international order. It explores the ideas of Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, William of Ockham, Martin Luther, and other theologians to rise above the sharp differentiation of medieval and modern that underpins most international thought. Uncovering this theological inheritance invites a fundamental reassessment of canonical figures, such as Hugo Grotius and Thomas Hobbes, and their contribution to theorizing international order. Second, this book shows how theological ideas continue to shape modern theories of international order by structuring the questions theorists ask as well as the answer they provide. It argues that the dominant vocabulary of international order, system and society, anarchy, balance of power, and constitutionalism, is mediated by the intellectual commitments of nominalist theology. It concludes by exploring the implications of thinking in terms of this theological inheritance, albeit in a world where God is only one of several possibilities that can called upon to secure the regularity of order. |
Who Are the Judges Ruling Against Trump's Orders? - The Daily …
Feb 27, 2025 · U.S. District Judge George O’Toole of the District of Massachusetts, an appointee of President Bill Clinton, issued a similar ruling to block the Trump administration’s restriction on …
Leavitt Goes Ballistic Over Ruling Against Trump Tariffs - The Daily …
May 29, 2025 · White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt went ballistic over a ruling from the U.S. Court of International Trade that struck down President Donald Trump’s use of the …
Why Did Liberal Supreme Court Justices Rule for Conservatives?
Jun 5, 2025 · The Supreme Court handed down three blockbuster rulings Thursday focused on hot-button cultural issues, and all three of them went in the conservative direction.. That’s not …
Major Democrat Donor Became Judge Ruling Against Trump - The …
Jun 6, 2025 · Next, McConnell will be ruling on a separate case brought by 20 Democrat state attorneys general against the Trump administration for threatening to withhold federal funds …
Supreme Court Dismisses Mexico's Attack on Gunmakers
Jun 5, 2025 · “This ruling does not address that crisis,” Durbin added. “While it’s a temporary win for gun manufacturers, the Supreme Court’s decision is narrow and specific to the claims in this ...
High Court Allows Trump to End Legal Status for 500K Illegal Aliens
May 30, 2025 · The Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to revoke temporary protected status for 500,000 illegal aliens living in the U.S. . In a 7-2 ruling on Friday, the justices …
Supreme Court Protects Majority Groups From Discrimination
Jun 5, 2025 · In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court Thursday upheld the claims of a woman who faced workplace discrimination because of her “majority group” identity—in this …
Idaho AG Hails State Court Ruling on Abortion Rights Restrictions
Apr 14, 2025 · The ruling follows a separate win last month for the state, when President Donald Trump’s Justice Department dropped a Biden-era lawsuit that was attempting to interpret federal …
ESG Ruling Puts Pressure on Public Pension Funds and BlackRock
Mar 25, 2025 · The court ruling stemmed from a class action lawsuit by American Airlines pilot Bryan Spence with more than 100,000 participants in the retirement plan.. O’Connor, an …
Trump DOJ Could Enforce Mail-In Ballot Ruling - The Daily Signal
Mar 7, 2025 · The ruling didn’t strike down the Mississippi law for the 2024 election, and in the immediate future, it might only affect the three states in the 5th Circuit. Though, unless it’s …
Who Are the Judges Ruling Against Trump's Orders? - The Daily …
Feb 27, 2025 · U.S. District Judge George O’Toole of the District of Massachusetts, an appointee of President Bill Clinton, issued a similar ruling to block the Trump administration’s restriction …
Leavitt Goes Ballistic Over Ruling Against Trump Tariffs - The Daily …
May 29, 2025 · White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt went ballistic over a ruling from the U.S. Court of International Trade that struck down President Donald Trump’s use of the …
Why Did Liberal Supreme Court Justices Rule for Conservatives?
Jun 5, 2025 · The Supreme Court handed down three blockbuster rulings Thursday focused on hot-button cultural issues, and all three of them went in the conservative direction.. That’s not …
Major Democrat Donor Became Judge Ruling Against Trump - The …
Jun 6, 2025 · Next, McConnell will be ruling on a separate case brought by 20 Democrat state attorneys general against the Trump administration for threatening to withhold federal funds …
Supreme Court Dismisses Mexico's Attack on Gunmakers
Jun 5, 2025 · “This ruling does not address that crisis,” Durbin added. “While it’s a temporary win for gun manufacturers, the Supreme Court’s decision is narrow and specific to the claims in …
High Court Allows Trump to End Legal Status for 500K Illegal Aliens
May 30, 2025 · The Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to revoke temporary protected status for 500,000 illegal aliens living in the U.S. . In a 7-2 ruling on Friday, the …
Supreme Court Protects Majority Groups From Discrimination
Jun 5, 2025 · In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court Thursday upheld the claims of a woman who faced workplace discrimination because of her “majority group” identity—in this …
Idaho AG Hails State Court Ruling on Abortion Rights Restrictions
Apr 14, 2025 · The ruling follows a separate win last month for the state, when President Donald Trump’s Justice Department dropped a Biden-era lawsuit that was attempting to interpret …
ESG Ruling Puts Pressure on Public Pension Funds and BlackRock
Mar 25, 2025 · The court ruling stemmed from a class action lawsuit by American Airlines pilot Bryan Spence with more than 100,000 participants in the retirement plan.. O’Connor, an …
Trump DOJ Could Enforce Mail-In Ballot Ruling - The Daily Signal
Mar 7, 2025 · The ruling didn’t strike down the Mississippi law for the 2024 election, and in the immediate future, it might only affect the three states in the 5th Circuit. Though, unless it’s …
