Advertisement
| battle damage assessment army: Army Techniques Publication ATP 4-31 / MCRP 3-40E.1 Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (BDAR) November 2020 United States Government Us Army, 2020-11-26 This United States Army and Marine Corps manual, Army Techniques Publication ATP 4-31 / MCRP 3-40E.1 Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (BDAR) November 2020, provides techniques on how recovery and battle damage assessment and repair (BDAR) are employed during operations. The principal audience for ATP 4-31/MCRP 3-40E.1 is all members of the profession of arms. Commanders and staffs of Army headquarters serving as joint task force or multinational headquarters should also refer to applicable joint or multinational doctrine concerning the range of military operations and joint or multinational forces. Trainers and educators throughout the Army will also use this publication. Soldiers, Marines, and officers who perform recovery operations and battle damage assessment and repair for their service perform a vital role of keeping units and personnel safe while maintaining and providing the effective operational readiness rates required to accomplish the mission. Recovery personnel, as identified in this publication, includes every person that plays a role in recovery operations or battle damage assessment and repair. This includes professional recovery personnel, such as maintenance control officers, warrant technicians and maintenance teams. All personnel involved in recovery operations/battle damage assessment and repair need to understand the environment in which they operate. This manual provides information on recovery support to unit operations including operations within the Joint environment. It is imperative for all personnel engaged in recovery operations or battle damage assessment and repair support operations to have an understanding of the various staff organizations that have a role in recovery planning and support. It will be necessary for a recovery support activity to contact the higher, lower, or adjacent headquarters (both sustainment and operational) to coordinate support, report status, request technical assistance, or request additional resources. This manual presents the roles and missions of the various recovery organizations to enhance coordination. Readers should follow the guidelines in this publication as closely as possible within the constraints and restrictions of the tactical situation. |
| battle damage assessment army: Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair Department of the Army, 2017-09-30 This manual, Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair, provides the authoritative doctrine guidance on using recovery and repair assets on the battlefield. Practical methods of recovering or repairing equipment (disabled or immobilized) due to hazardous terrain, mechanical failure, or a hostile action are also addressed. Field manual (FM) 4-30.31, Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair, is directed toward both the leader and the technician. Tactically, it provides an overview of how recovery and battle damage assessment and repair (BDAR) assets are employed on the battlefield. Technically, it provides principles of resistance and mechanical applications to overcome them. Equipment, rigging techniques, and expedient repairs are summarized as a refresher for recovery-trained military personnel and as general guidance for others. |
| battle damage assessment army: Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (FM 4-30. 31 / MCRP 4-11. 4A) Department of the Army, U.S. Marine Corps, 2012-11-12 This manual, “Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (FM 4-30.31),” provides the authoritative doctrine guidance on using recovery and repair assets on the battlefield. Practical methods of recovering or repairing equipment (disabled or immobilized) due to hazardous terrain, mechanical failure, or a hostile action are also addressed. Field manual (FM) 4-30.31 is directed toward both the leader and the technician. Tactically, it provides an overview of how recovery and battle damage assessment and repair (BDAR) assets are employed on the battlefield. Technically, it provides principles of resistance and mechanical applications to overcome them. Equipment, rigging techniques, and expedient repairs are summarized as a refresher for recovery-trained military personnel and as general guidance for others. The procedures and doctrine in this manual apply to both wartime operations and military operations other than war. Normally, BDAR should be used when and where standard maintenance practices are not practical because of the mission, enemy, terrain and weather, troops and support available, time available, civil considerations (METT-TC) or METT-T space and logistics (METT-TSL) for USMC. BDAR is not intended to replace standard maintenance practices but rather to supplement them under certain conditions. Standard maintenance procedures provide the best, most effective means of returning disabled equipment to the operational commander—provided adequate time, parts, and tools are available. High-risk battle damage repairs (involving possible danger to personnel or further damage to equipment) are only permitted in emergencies, normally in a battlefield environment, and only when authorized by the unit commander or his designated representative. The goal is to return a combat system to the battlefield in the least amount of time, while minimizing danger to personnel and equipment. BDAR techniques are not limited to simply restoring minimal functional combat capability. If full mission capability can be restored expediently with a limited expenditure of time and assets, it should be restored. This decision is based on METT-TC. Some BDAR techniques, if applied, may result in shortened lifespan or further damage to components. The commander must decide whether the risk of having one less piece of equipment outweighs the risk of applying a potentially destructive field-expedient repair. Each technique provides appropriate warnings and cautions, which list the system's limitations caused by the action. Personnel must use ground guides and extreme caution when operating recovery assets around or on an aircraft. |
| battle damage assessment army: Army Techniques Publication Atp 4-31/McRp 4-11.4a Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (Bdar) August 2014 United States Government US Army, 2016-12-18 Army Techniques Publication ATP 4-31/MCRP 4-11.4A Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (BDAR) August 2014 Soldiers and officers that perform recovery operations/battle damage assessment and repair for the Army perform a vital role of keeping their units and Army personnel safe while maintaining and providing the effective operational readiness rates needed to accomplish the mission. Recovery personnel, as identified in this publication, include every person that plays a role in recovery operations or battle damage assessment and repair. This includes professional recovery personnel, such as maintenance control officers, warrant technicians and maintenance teams. All personnel involved in recovery operations/ battle damage assessment and repair need to understand the environment in which they operate. This manual provides information on recovery support to unit operations also including the Joint environment. It is imperative for all personnel engaged in recovery operations/ battle damage assessment and repair support operations to have an understanding of the various staff organizations that have a role in recovery planning and support. It will be necessary for a recovery support activity to contact the higher, lower, or adjacent headquarters (both sustainment and operational) to coordinate support, report status, request technical assistance, or request additional resources. This manual will present the roles and mission of the various recovery organizations so that proper coordination can be conducted. The guidelines in this publication should be followed as closely as possible within the constraints and restrictions of the tactical situation. ATP 4-31, Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (BDAR), is the revision of FM 4-30.31, Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair. ATP 4-31 provides an overview of the battlefield recovery, and battle damage assessment and repair for the fundamental purpose of returning combat assets to the battlefield as soon as possible. It also explains the difference between recovery operations with its different types and methods and the battle assessment and repairs. This publication also reviews the rigging procedures and the utilization of the mechanical advantage to accomplish the mission. Overviews the recovery methods, techniques and the safety precautions associated with each recovery operation. Major changes from FM 4-30.31 include an improved hand and arm signals for day and night recovery operations |
| battle damage assessment army: Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment Repair Department of the Army, 2006-10-19 This manual provides the authoritative doctrine guidance on using recovery and repair assets on the battlefield. Practical methods of recovering or repairing equipment (disabled or immobilized) due to hazardous terrain, mechanical failure, or a hostile action are also addressed.Field manual (FM) 4-30.31 is directed toward both the leader and the technician. Tactically, it provides an overview of how recovery and battle damage assessment and repair (BDAR) assets are employed on the battlefield. Technically, it provides principles of resistance and mechanical applications to overcome them. Equipment, rigging techniques, and expedient repairs are summarized as a refresher for recovery-trained military personnel and as general guidance for others.The procedures and doctrine in this manual apply to both wartime operations and military operations other than war. Normally, BDAR should be used when and where standard maintenance practices are not practical because of the mission, enemy, terrain and weather, troops and support available, time available, civil considerations (METT-TC) or METT-T space and logistics (METT-TSL) for USMC. BDAR is not intended to replace standard maintenance practices but rather to supplement them under certain conditions. Standard maintenance procedures provide the best, most effective means of returning disabled equipment to the operational commander—provided adequate time, parts, and tools are available.High-risk battle damage repairs (involving possible danger to personnel or further damage to equipment) are only permitted in emergencies, normally in a battlefield environment, and only when authorized by the unit commander or his designated representative. The goal is to return a combat system to the battlefield in the least amount of time, while minimizing danger to personnel and equipment.BDAR techniques are not limited to simply restoring minimal functional combat capability. If full mission capability can be restored expediently with a limited expenditure of time and assets, it should be restored. This decision is based on METT-TC.Some BDAR techniques, if applied, may result in shortened lifespan or further damage to components. The commander must decide whether the risk of having one less piece of equipment outweighs the risk of applying a potentially destructive field-expedient repair. Each technique provides appropriate warnings and cautions, which list the system's limitations caused by the action. Personnel must use ground guides and extreme caution when operating recovery assets around or on an aircraft. |
| battle damage assessment army: Airpower against an Army: Challenge and Response in CENTAF's Duel with the Republican Guard William F. Andrews, For nearly two decades the United States Air Force (USAF) oriented the bulk of its thinking, acquisition, planning, and training on the threat of a Soviet blitzkrieg across the inter German border. The Air Force fielded a powerful conventional arm well rehearsed in the tactics required to operate over a central European battlefield. Then, in a matter of days, the 1990 invasion of Kuwait altered key assumptions that had been developed over the previous decade and a half. The USAF faced a different foe employing a different military doctrine in an unexpected environment. Instead of disrupting a fast paced land offensive, the combat wings of the United States Central Command Air Forces (CENTAF) were ordered to attack a large, well fortified, and dispersed Iraqi ground force. The heart of that ground force was the Republican Guard Forces Command (RGFC). CENTAF's mission dictated the need to develop an unfamiliar repertoire of tactics and procedures to meet theater objectives. How effectively did CENTAF adjust air operations against the Republican Guard to the changing realities of combat? Answering that question is central to this study, and the answer resides in evaluation of the innovations developed by CENTAF to improve its operational and tactical performance against the Republican Guard. Effectiveness and timeliness are the primary criteria used for evaluating innovations. |
| battle damage assessment army: Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms United States. Joint Chiefs of Staff, 1979 |
| battle damage assessment army: Countdown to Zero Day Kim Zetter, 2015-09-01 A top cybersecurity journalist tells the story behind the virus that sabotaged Iran’s nuclear efforts and shows how its existence has ushered in a new age of warfare—one in which a digital attack can have the same destructive capability as a megaton bomb. “Immensely enjoyable . . . Zetter turns a complicated and technical cyber story into an engrossing whodunit.”—The Washington Post The virus now known as Stuxnet was unlike any other piece of malware built before: Rather than simply hijacking targeted computers or stealing information from them, it proved that a piece of code could escape the digital realm and wreak actual, physical destruction—in this case, on an Iranian nuclear facility. In these pages, journalist Kim Zetter tells the whole story behind the world’s first cyberweapon, covering its genesis in the corridors of the White House and its effects in Iran—and telling the spectacular, unlikely tale of the security geeks who managed to unravel a top secret sabotage campaign years in the making. But Countdown to Zero Day also ranges beyond Stuxnet itself, exploring the history of cyberwarfare and its future, showing us what might happen should our infrastructure be targeted by a Stuxnet-style attack, and ultimately, providing a portrait of a world at the edge of a new kind of war. |
| battle damage assessment army: Toward Combined Arms Warfare Jonathan Mallory House, 1985 |
| battle damage assessment army: Lucky War Richard Moody Swain, 1997 Provides an account, from the point of view of the U.S. Army forces employed, of the 1990-91 Persian Gulf War, from the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait to the withdrawal of coalition forces from southeastern Iraq. It focuses on the Army's part in this war, particularly the activities of the Headquarters, Third Army, and the Army Forces Central Command (ARCENT). It looks especially at the activities of the VII Corps, which executed ARCENT's main effort in the theater ground force schwerpunkt -- General Schwarzkopf's Great Wheel. This is not an official history; the author speaks in his own voice and makes his own judgments. Maps. |
| battle damage assessment army: Deep Maneuver Jack D Kern Editor, Jack Kern, 2018-10-12 Volume 5, Deep Maneuver: Historical Case Studies of Maneuver in Large-Scale Combat Operations, presents eleven case studies from World War II through Operation Iraqi Freedom focusing on deep maneuver in terms of time, space and purpose. Deep operations require boldness and audacity, and yet carry an element of risk of overextension - especially in light of the independent factors of geography and weather that are ever-present. As a result, the case studies address not only successes, but also failure and shortfalls that result when conducting deep operations. The final two chapters address these considerations for future Deep Maneuver. |
| battle damage assessment army: Assessing War Leo J. Blanken, Hy Rothstein, Jason J. Lepore, 2015-12-15 Today's protracted asymmetrical conflicts confuse efforts to measure progress, often inviting politics and wishful thinking to replace objective evaluation. In Assessing War, military historians, social scientists, and military officers explore how observers have analyzed the trajectory of war in American conflicts from the Seven Years’ War through the war in Afghanistan. Drawing on decades of acquired expertise, the contributors examine wartime assessment in both theory and practice and, through alternative dimensions of assessment such as justice and proportionality, the war of ideas and economics. This group of distinguished authors grapples with both conventional and irregular wars and emerging aspects of conflict—such as cyberwar and nation building—that add to the complexities of the modern threat environment. The volume ends with recommendations for practitioners on best approaches while offering sobering conclusions about the challenges of assessing war without politicization or self-delusion. Covering conflicts from the eighteenth century to today, Assessing War blends focused advice and a uniquely broad set of case studies to ponder vital questions about warfare's past—and its future. The book includes a foreword by Gen. George W. Casey Jr. (USA, Ret.), former chief of staff of the US Army and former commander, Multi-National Force–Iraq. |
| battle damage assessment army: On War Carl von Clausewitz, 1908 |
| battle damage assessment army: TRADOC Pamphlet TP 600-4 The Soldier's Blue Book United States Government Us Army, 2019-12-14 This manual, TRADOC Pamphlet TP 600-4 The Soldier's Blue Book: The Guide for Initial Entry Soldiers August 2019, is the guide for all Initial Entry Training (IET) Soldiers who join our Army Profession. It provides an introduction to being a Soldier and Trusted Army Professional, certified in character, competence, and commitment to the Army. The pamphlet introduces Solders to the Army Ethic, Values, Culture of Trust, History, Organizations, and Training. It provides information on pay, leave, Thrift Saving Plans (TSPs), and organizations that will be available to assist you and your Families. The Soldier's Blue Book is mandated reading and will be maintained and available during BCT/OSUT and AIT.This pamphlet applies to all active Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and the Army National Guard enlisted IET conducted at service schools, Army Training Centers, and other training activities under the control of Headquarters, TRADOC. |
| battle damage assessment army: Bringing Order to Chaos Peter J Schifferle Editor, Peter Schifferle, 2018-10-12 Volume 2, Bringing Order to Chaos: Combined Arms Maneuver in Large Scale Combat Operations, opens a dialogue with the Army. Are we ready for the significantly increased casualties inherent to intensive combat between large formations, the constant paralyzing stress of continual contact with a peer enemy, and the difficult nature of command and control while attempting division and corps combined arms maneuver to destroy that enemy? The chapters in this volume answer these questions for combat operations while spanning military history from 1917 through 2003. These accounts tell the challenges of intense combat, the drain of heavy casualties, the difficulty of commanding and controlling huge formations in contact, the effective use of direct and indirect fires, the need for high quality leadership, thoughtful application of sound doctrine, and logistical sustainment up to the task. No large scale combat engagement, battle, or campaign of the last one hundred years has been successful without being better than the enemy in these critical capabilities. What can we learn from the past to help us make the transition to ready to fight tonight? |
| battle damage assessment army: Thinking Effects: Effects-Based Methodology for Joint Operations Edward C. Mann III, 2022 |
| battle damage assessment army: Cross Channel Attack Gordon A. Harrison, 1993-12 Discusses the Allied invasion of Normandy, with extensive details about the planning stage, called Operation Overlord, as well as the fighting on Utah and Omaha Beaches. |
| battle damage assessment army: The Evolution of Operational Art G. S. Isserson, Bruce Menning, 2013 |
| battle damage assessment army: Gulf War Air Power Survey Thomas A. Keaney, Eliot A. Cohen, 1993 |
| battle damage assessment army: Getting MAD: Nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction, Its Origins and Practice , 2004 Nearly 40 years after the concept of finite deterrence was popularized by the Johnson administration, nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) thinking appears to be in decline. The United States has rejected the notion that threatening population centers with nuclear attacks is a legitimate way to assure deterrence. Most recently, it withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, an agreement based on MAD. American opposition to MAD also is reflected in the Bush administration's desire to develop smaller, more accurate nuclear weapons that would reduce the number of innocent civilians killed in a nuclear strike. Still, MAD is influential in a number of ways. First, other countries, like China, have not abandoned the idea that holding their adversaries' cities at risk is necessary to assure their own strategic security. Nor have U.S. and allied security officials and experts fully abandoned the idea. At a minimum, acquiring nuclear weapons is still viewed as being sensible to face off a hostile neighbor that might strike one's own cities. Thus, our diplomats have been warning China that Japan would be under tremendous pressure to go nuclear if North Korea persisted in acquiring a few crude weapons of its own. Similarly, Israeli officials have long argued, without criticism, that they would not be second in acquiring nuclear weapons in the Middle East. Indeed, given that Israelis surrounded by enemies that would not hesitate to destroy its population if they could, Washington finds Israel's retention of a significant nuclear capability totally understandable. |
| battle damage assessment army: Weapon Systems Handbook , 2020-05-03 July 2019 Printed in BLACK AND WHITE The Army's Weapon Systems Handbook was updated in July 2019, but is still titled Weapon Systems Handbook 2018. We are printing this in black and white to keep the price low. It presents many of the acquisition programs currently fielded or in development. The U.S. Army Acquisition Corps, with its 36,000 professionals, bears a unique responsibility for the oversight and systems management of the Army's acquisition lifecycle. With responsibility for hundreds of acquisition programs, civilian and military professionals collectively oversee research, development and acquisition activities totaling more than $20 billion in Fiscal Year 2016 alone. Why buy a book you can download for free? We print this so you don't have to. We at 4th Watch Publishing are former government employees, so we know how government employees actually use the standards. When a new standard is released, somebody has to print it, punch holes and put it in a 3-ring binder. While this is not a big deal for a 5 or 10-page document, many DoD documents are over 400 pages and printing a large document is a time- consuming effort. So, a person that's paid $25 an hour is spending hours simply printing out the tools needed to do the job. That's time that could be better spent doing mission. We publish these documents so you can focus on what you are there for. It's much more cost-effective to just order the latest version from Amazon.com. SDVOSB If there is a standard you would like published, let us know. Our web site is usgovpub.com |
| battle damage assessment army: The 71F Advantage National Defense University Press, 2010-09 Includes a foreword by Major General David A. Rubenstein. From the editor: 71F, or 71 Foxtrot, is the AOC (area of concentration) code assigned by the U.S. Army to the specialty of Research Psychology. Qualifying as an Army research psychologist requires, first of all, a Ph.D. from a research (not clinical) intensive graduate psychology program. Due to their advanced education, research psychologists receive a direct commission as Army officers in the Medical Service Corps at the rank of captain. In terms of numbers, the 71F AOC is a small one, with only 25 to 30 officers serving in any given year. However, the 71F impact is much bigger than this small cadre suggests. Army research psychologists apply their extensive training and expertise in the science of psychology and social behavior toward understanding, preserving, and enhancing the health, well being, morale, and performance of Soldiers and military families. As is clear throughout the pages of this book, they do this in many ways and in many areas, but always with a scientific approach. This is the 71F advantage: applying the science of psychology to understand the human dimension, and developing programs, policies, and products to benefit the person in military operations. This book grew out of the April 2008 biennial conference of U.S. Army Research Psychologists, held in Bethesda, Maryland. This meeting was to be my last as Consultant to the Surgeon General for Research Psychology, and I thought it would be a good idea to publish proceedings, which had not been done before. As Consultant, I'd often wished for such a document to help explain to people what it is that Army Research Psychologists do for a living. In addition to our core group of 71Fs, at the Bethesda 2008 meeting we had several brand-new members, and a number of distinguished retirees, the grey-beards of the 71F clan. Together with longtime 71F colleagues Ross Pastel and Mark Vaitkus, I also saw an unusual opportunity to capture some of the history of the Army Research Psychology specialty while providing a representative sample of current 71F research and activities. It seemed to us especially important to do this at a time when the operational demands on the Army and the total force were reaching unprecedented levels, with no sign of easing, and with the Army in turn relying more heavily on research psychology to inform its programs for protecting the health, well being, and performance of Soldiers and their families. |
| battle damage assessment army: The Targeting Process U. S. Department of the Army, Army Fires Center of Excellence, 2010-11 Field Manual (FM) 3-60, The Targeting Process consists of five chapters and eight appendices to describe the Army's targeting process. Each chapter and appendix addresses how the decide, detect, deliver, and assess (D3A) methodology enhances the targeting process. The D3A is a methodology which optimizes the integration and synchronization of maneuver, fire support, and intelligence from task force to corps level operations. The D3A is described without tying it to specific hardware that will eventually become dated. The Army's targetingprocess consists of time tested techniques organized in a systematic framework.The FM 3-60 addresses how D3A methodology interfaces with the joint targeting cycle, military decisionmaking process (MDMP), and operations process. The joint targeting fundamental principles and doctrinal guidance are also presented in this publication. Successful targeting requires that the leadership team and their staff possess an understanding of the functions associated with the targeting process. The FM 3-60 builds on the collective knowledge, experience gained through recent operations, and numerous exercises. The manual is rooted in time tested principles and fundamentals, while accommodating force design, new technologies, and diverse threats to national security. |
| battle damage assessment army: USS Franklin CV-13 War Damage Report U. S. Navy Department Staff, Us Navy, 2013-12-16 USS Franklin CV-13 ...also known as the ship that would not die. 1-1This is a long report. An effort has been made to present a comprehensive summation of the many design and damage control problems which were disclosed or emphasized by the war experiences of Franklin. In addition, various pertinent war experiences of other large carriers have been considered in this report. 1-2The damage sustained by Franklin as a result of the actions of 13 and 15 October 1944 was superficial and is included in this report only for the purpose of rendering her damage history complete. The major damage sustained in each of the actions of 30 October 1944 and 19 March 1945 demonstrates the effectiveness of bomb hits when received by aircraft carriers during the extremely vulnerable period just prior to and during periods of launching strikes. The damage sustained on 30 October is a reasonably good example of what may be expected from a suicide plane crash and subsequent fire on a carrier having a full complement of planes on board which are gassed but not armed except for small caliber ammunition. Similarly, the damage sustained on 19 March may be considered as about the maximum to be expected from fires and detonations of large numbers of bombs and rockets on the flight and hangar decks when a carrier having heavily armed, fully fueled planes aboard is hit by one or more bombs properly placed. 1-3The latter two cases of damage to Franklin illustrate thoroughly the ability of modern U.S. aircraft carriers to survive extensive damage from plane crashes, fire and heavy bombs. The basic design and construction of this class of carrier, which was developed prior to World War II and therefore without the benefit of war experience, is favorably reflected in the manner in which Franklin absorbed heavy damage. Materiel alterations and improvements in damage control organization and technique during the war further increased the ability of this class carrier to minimize potentially severe damage. At the same time many lessons have been obtained from the experiences of Franklin and other cases of war damage and results of this knowledge have been and will be incorporated in existing ships where feasible and in future design and construction. 1-4This report is based on the references, inspections of Franklin upon her return to this country, and informal interviews with various officers attached to Franklin by representatives of this Bureau. |
| battle damage assessment army: Carl A. Spaatz and the Air War in Europe Richard G. Davis, 1993 Offers the first detailed review of Carl A. Spaatz as a commander. Examines how the highest ranking U.S. airman in the European Theater of Operations of World War II viewed the war, worked with the British, and wielded the formidable air power at his disposal. Identifies specifically those aspects of his leadership that proved indispensable to the Allied Victory over Nazi Germany. Chapters: Carrying the Flame: From West Point to London, 1891-1942; Tempering the Blade: The North African Campaign, 1942-1943; Mediterranean Interlude: From Pantelleria to London, 1943; The Point of the Blade: Strategic Bombing and the Cross-Channel Invasion, 1944; and The Mortal Blow: From Normandy to Berlin, 1944-1945. Maps, charts and b & w photos. |
| battle damage assessment army: Setup Earl H. Tilford, Air University Press, 2013-07 |
| battle damage assessment army: Lethal and Non-Lethal Fires Army University Press, Thomas G. Bradbeer, 2018-09 Lethal and Non-Lethal Fires: Historical Case Studies of Converging Cross-Domain Fires in Large Scale Combat Operations, provides a collection of ten historical case studies from World War I through Desert Storm. The case studies detail the use of lethal and non-lethal fires conducted by US, British, Canadian, and Israeli forces against peer or near-peer threats. The case studies span the major wars of the twentieth-century and present the doctrine the various organizations used, together with the challenges the leaders encountered with the doctrine and the operational environment, as well as the leaders' actions and decisions during the conduct of operations. Most importantly, each chapter highlights the lessons learned from those large scale combat operations, how they were applied or ignored and how they remain relevant today and in the future. |
| battle damage assessment army: Manuals Combined: 100+ U.S. Army CH-47A CH-47B CH-47C and CH-47D Chinook Helicopter Operator; Repair Parts And Special Tools List; Modification Word Order; One Time Inspection; Maintenance; And Maintenance Test Flight Manuals , Well over 18,000 total pages ... Most manuals published by the Department of the Army (with updates) between 1999 and 2003. Contains Repair, Repair Parts, Special Tools Lists, Maintenance, Checklist and Flight-related Technical Manuals and Bulletins for the CH-47A, CH-47B, CH-47C and CH-47D Chinook helicopter. Just a SAMPLE of the CONTENTS: AVIATION UNIT AND AVIATION INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE MANUAL CH-47D HELICOPTER, 1,335 pages - Aviation Unit and Aviation Intermediate Troubleshooting Manual, CH-47D Helicopter, 1,225 pages - ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS AND SPECIAL TOOLS LISTS FOR ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION FOR CH-47A, CH-47B, AND CH-47C HELICOPTERS, 116 pages - Preparation for Shipment of CH-47 HELICOPTER, 131 pages - OPERATOR, AVIATION UNIT, AND AVIATION INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE MANUAL WITH REPAIR PARTS AND SPECIAL TOOLS LIST EXTENDED RANGE FUEL SYSTEM ARMY MODEL CH-47 HELICOPTER, 194 pages - AVIATION UNIT AND INTERMEDIATEMAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS AND SPECIAL TOOLS LIST (INCLUDING DEPOT MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS AND SPECIAL TOOLS) HELICOPTER, CARGO TRANSPORT CH-47D, 689 pages - AVIATION UNIT AND INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS AND SPECIAL TOOLS LIST (INCLUDING DEPOT MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS AND SPECIAL TOOLS) HELICOPTER, CARGO TRANSPORT CH-47D, 511 pages - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE DAILY INSPECTION CHECKLIST CH-47D HELICOPTER, 30 pages - PHASED MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST CH-47D HELICOPTER, 117 pages - MAINTENANCE TEST FLIGHT MANUAL ARMY MODEL CH-47D HELICOPTER, 195 pages - Operator's and Crewmember's Checklist ARMY CH-47D HELICOPTER, 49 pages - ONE TIME VISUAL INSPECTION AND RECORDS CHECK OF THE UPPER BOOST ACTUATORS AND PULL TEST OF SWASHPLATE FOR ALL CH-47D, MH-47D, AND MH-47E AIRCRAFT, 11 pages - WARRANTY PROGRAM FOR HELICOPTER, CARGO TRANSPORT CH-47D, 28 pages - CALIBRATION PROCEDURE FOR CH-47 INTEGRATED LOWER CONTROL ACTUATOR (ILCA) BENCH TEST SET, 50 pages REPAIR PARTS AND SPECIAL TOOLS LIST FOR STABILITY AUGMENTATION SYSTEM AMPLIFIERS CH-47A, CH-47B, AND CH-47C HELICOPTERS, 53 pages - AVIATION UNIT AND AVIATION INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE For GENERAL TIE-DOWN AND MOORING ON ALL SERIES ARMY MODELS AH-64, UH-60, CH-47, UH-1, AH-1, OH-58 HELICOPTERS, 60 pages - OPERATOR'S MANUAL FOR CH-47D (CHINOOK) FLIGHT SIMULATOR Device 2B31A, 185 pages |
| battle damage assessment army: The Russian Way of War Lester W. Grau, Charles K. Bartles, 2018 Force Structure, Tactics, and Modernization of the Russian Ground Forces The mighty Soviet Army is no more. The feckless Russian Army that stumbled into Chechnya is no more. Today's Russian Army is modern, better manned, better equipped and designed for maneuver combat under nuclear-threatened conditions. This is your source for the tactics, equipment, force structure and theoretical underpinnings of a major Eurasian power. Here's what the experts are saying: A superb baseline study for understanding how and why the modern Russian Army functions as it does. Essential for specialist and generalist alike. -Colonel (Ret) David M. Glantz, foremost Western author on the Soviet Union in World War II and Editor of The Journal of Slavic Military Studies. Congratulations to Les Grau and Chuck Bartles on filling a gap which has yawned steadily wider since the end of the USSR. Their book addresses evolving Russian views on war, including the blurring of its nature and levels, and the consequent Russian approaches to the Ground Forces' force structuring, manning, equipping, and tactics. Confidence is conferred on the validity of their arguments and conclusions by copious footnoting, mostly from an impressive array of primary sources. It is this firm grounding in Russian military writings, coupled with the authors' understanding of war and the Russian way of thinking about it, that imparts such an authoritative tone to this impressive work. -Charles Dick, former Director of the Combat Studies Research Centre, Senior Fellow at the Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, author of the 1991 British Army Field Manual, Volume 2, A Treatise on Soviet Operational Art and author of From Victory to Stalemate The Western Front, Summer 1944 and From Defeat to Victory, The Eastern Front, Summer 1944. Dr. Lester Grau's and Chuck Bartles' professional research on the Russian Armed Forces is widely read throughout the world and especially in Russia. Russia's Armed Forces have changed much since the large-scale reforms of 2008, which brought the Russian Army to the level of the world's other leading armies. The speed of reform combined with limited information about their core mechanisms represented a difficult challenge to the authors. They have done a great job and created a book which could be called an encyclopedia of the modern armed forces of Russia. They used their wisdom and talents to explore vital elements of the Russian military machine: the system of recruitment and training, structure of units of different levels, methods and tactics in defense and offence and even such little-known fields as the Arctic forces and the latest Russian combat robotics. -Dr. Vadim Kozyulin, Professor of Military Science and Project Director, Project on Asian Security, Emerging Technologies and Global Security Project PIR Center, Moscow. Probably the best book on the Russian Armed Forces published in North America during the past ten years. A must read for all analysts and professionals following Russian affairs. A reliable account of the strong and weak aspects of the Russian Army. Provides the first look on what the Russian Ministry of Defense learned from best Western practices and then applied them on Russian soil. -Ruslan Pukhov, Director of the Moscow-based Centre for the Analysis of Strategies and Technologies (CAST) and member of the Public Council of the Russian Federation Ministry of Defense. Author of Brothers Armed: Military Aspects of the Crisis in Ukraine, Russia's New Army, and The Tanks of August. |
| battle damage assessment army: Commander's Handbook for Assessment Planning and Execution Joint Staff, 2012-10-16 This handbook provides an understanding of the processes and procedures being employed by joint force commanders and their staffs to plan and execute assessment activities. It provides fundamental principles, techniques, and considerations related to assessment that are being employed in the field and are evolving toward incorporation in joint doctrine. Furthermore, this handbook supplements doctrinal publications by providing detailed guidance to conduct effects assessment, task assessment, and deficiency analysis. Commanders, assisted by their staffs and subordinate commanders, along with interagency and multinational partners and other stakeholders, will continuously assess the operational environment and the progress of the operation toward the desired end state in the time frame desired. Based on their assessment, commanders direct adjustments, thus ensuring the operation remains focused on accomplishing the mission. Assessment is applicable across the range of military operations. It offers perspective and insight, and provides the opportunity for self-correction, adaptation, and thoughtful results-oriented learning. Assessment is a key component of the commander's decision cycle, helping to determine the results of tactical actions in the context of overall mission objectives and providing potential recommendations for the refinement of future plans. Assessments provide the commander with the current state of the operational environment, the progress of the campaign or operation, and recommendations to account for discrepancies between the actual and predicted progress. Commanders then compare the assessment against their vision and intent and adjust operations to ensure objectives are met and the military end state is achieved. First, assessment must determine where we are. The assessment process must examine the data received and determine, in relation to the desired effects, the current status of the operation and the operational environment. This is the most basic and fundamental question that assessment must answer. The second fundamental issue that assessment must address is so what and why (i.e., what does the data mean and what is its significance)? To answer this question, the assessment team will examine the measure of effectiveness indicators, both individually and in relation to each other. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, assessment must begin to address the what's next? Assessment must combine the analysis of the where we are and the so what and develop thoughtful, logical guidance for the command's planning efforts. Assessments are interrelated and interdependent. Although each level of assessment may have a specific focus and a unique battle rhythm, together they form a hierarchical structure in which the conduct of one level of assessment is crucial to the success of the next. Theater strategic and operational-level assessment efforts concentrate on broader tasks, effects, objectives, and progress toward the end state, while tactical-level assessment primarily focuses on task accomplishment. This handbook provides users with a pre-doctrinal reference describing how to conduct assessment execution and planning. Its primary purpose is to improve the US military's assessment process through educating the user on basics, best practices, and processes. This handbook was developed based on observations at combatant commands as well as joint task force staffs. It was developed in close coordination with, and used significant input from, both civilian and military subject matter experts. Assessment is a collaborative effort between the joint force, interagency and multinational partners, and other stakeholders. As such, this handbook addresses the necessity for an inclusive assessment process and effort at every level. It also presents some assessment resources developed by other stakeholders and currently in use throughout the world. |
| battle damage assessment army: US Army Physician Assistant Handbook , 2018 The Army physician assistant (PA) has an important role throughout Army medicine. This handbook will describe the myriad positions and organizations in which PAs play leadership roles in management and patient care. Chapters also cover PA education, certification, continuing training, and career progression. Topics include the Interservice PA Program, assignments at the White House and the Old Guard (3d US Infantry Regiment), and roles in research and recruiting, as well as the PA's role in emergency medicine, aeromedical evacuation, clinical care, surgery, and occupational health.--Amazon.com viewed Oct. 29, 2020. |
| battle damage assessment army: Guiding Principles for Stabilization and Reconstruction United States Institute of Peace, 2009 Claude Chabrol's second film follows the fortunes of two cousins: Charles, a hard-working student who has arrived in Paris from his small hometown; and Paul, the dedicated hedonist who puts him up. Despite their differences in temperament, the two young men strike up a close friendship, until an attractive woman comes between them. |
| battle damage assessment army: Frontier Computing Jason C. Hung, Neil Y. Yen, Lin Hui, 2019-05-18 This book presents the proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Frontier Computing, held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia on July 3–6, 2018, and provides comprehensive coverage of the latest advances and trends in information technology, science and engineering. It addresses a number of broad themes, including communication networks, business intelligence and knowledge management, web intelligence, and related fields that inspire the development of information technology. The contributions cover a wide range of topics: database and data mining, networking and communications, web and internet of things, embedded systems, soft computing, social network analysis, security and privacy, optical communication, and ubiquitous/pervasive computing. Many of the papers outline promising future research directions. The book is a valuable resource for students, researchers and professionals, and also offers a useful reference guide for newcomers to the field. |
| battle damage assessment army: Army Logistician , 1982 The official magazine of United States Army logistics. |
| battle damage assessment army: Theater Army Operations Department of the Army, 2017-08-15 Doctrine provides a military organization with unity of effort and a common philosophy, language, and purpose. This manual, Theater Army Operations (FM3-93), discusses the organization and operations of the theater army headquarters, including its role as the Army Service component command (ASCC) to the geographic combatant commander (GCC) and the relationships between the theater army headquarters and the theater enabling commands. The manual also discusses theater army responsibilities for setting the theater, Title 10 functions and responsibilities, generally referred to as the combatant commander's daily operations requirements, as well as the operational employment of the theater army's contingency command post (CCP) to directly mission command limited types of operations. |
| battle damage assessment army: FM 34-52 Intelligence Interrogation Department of Department of the Army, 2017-12-13 The 1992 edition of the FM 34-52 Intelligence Interrogation Field Manual. |
| battle damage assessment army: Piercing the Fog John F. Kreis, Air Force History and Museums Program, 2013-05 From the foreword: WHEN JAPAN ATTACKED PEARL HARBOR on December 7, 1941, and Germany and Italy joined Japan four days later in declaring war against the United States, intelligence essential for the Army Air Forces to conduct effective warfare in the European and Pacific theaters did not exist. Piercing the Fog tells the intriguing story of how airmen built intelligence organizations to collect and process information about the enemy and to produce and disseminate intelligence to decisionmakers and warfighters in the bloody, horrific crucible of war. Because the problems confronting and confounding air intelligence officers, planners, and operators fifty years ago still resonate, Piercing the Fog is particularly valuable for intelligence officers, planners, and operators today and for anyone concerned with acquiring and exploiting intelligence for successful air warfare. More than organizational history, this book reveals the indispensable and necessarily secret role intelligence plays in effectively waging war. It examines how World War II was a watershed period for Air Force Intelligence and for the acquisition and use of signals intelligence, photo reconnaissance intelligence, human resources intelligence, and scientific and technical intelligence. Piercing the Fog discusses the development of new sources and methods of intelligence collection; requirements for intelligence at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels of warfare; intelligence to support missions for air superiority, interdiction, strategic bombardment, and air defense; the sharing of intelligence in a coalition and joint service environment; the acquisition of intelligence to assess bomb damage on a target-by-target basis and to measure progress in achieving campaign and war objecti ves; and the ability of military leaders to understand the intentions and capabilities of the enemy and to appreciate the pressures on intelligence officers to sometimes tell commanders what they think the commanders want to hear instead of what the intelligence discloses. The complex problems associated with intelligence to support strategic bombardment in the 1940s will strike some readers as uncannily prescient to global Air Force operations in the 1990s., Illustrated. |
| battle damage assessment army: Field Manual FM 3-98 Reconnaissance and Security Operations July 2015 United States Army, 2015-08-08 This publication, Field Manual FM 3-98 Reconnaissance and Security Operations July 2015, provides doctrinal guidance and direction for Cavalry organizations, as well as reconnaissance and security organizations. This FM establishes the foundation for the development of tactics and procedures in subordinate doctrine publications. This publication applies across the range of military operations. While the main focus of this field manual is Cavalry formations within the units listed below, all maneuver formations must be able to conduct reconnaissance and security tasks. - Armored brigade combat team (ABCT) Cavalry squadron. - Infantry brigade combat team (IBCT) Cavalry squadron. - Stryker brigade combat team (SBCT) Cavalry squadron. - Battlefield surveillance brigade (BFSB) Cavalry squadron. - It is applicable to the- - Scout platoon of maneuver battalions. - Combat aviation brigade air squadron. The principal audiences for FM 3-98 are commanders, leaders, and staffs responsible for the planning, execution, or support of reconnaissance and security operations as well as instructors charged with teaching reconnaissance and security operations. Doctrine consists of fundamental principles that describe how to fight. At the tactical level, doctrine consists of authoritative principles concerning how to execute reconnaissance and security operations as part of Army and joint operations that require professional military judgment in their application. Importantly, our doctrine must describe how brigade combat teams (BCT) and subordinate units combine the capabilities of various arms into cohesive, combined arms, air-ground teams and provide a clear description of how to execute reconnaissance and security operations. This publication provides the commander and staff of Cavalry formations with doctrine relevant to Army and joint operations. This publication explains how effective reconnaissance and security operations generate depth, allow commanders reaction time and maneuver space, fight for information and collect information through stealth, protect against surprise, ease the forward movement of follow-on forces, and provide commanders with flexibility and adaptability. The doctrine described in this publication is applicable across unified land operations. The previous proponent manual for Cavalry Operations was FM 3-20.96, published 12 March 2010, which included operational considerations. This publication provides doctrinal guidance for all formations assigned to the ABCT, the IBCT, and SBCT. The following is a summary of each chapter in the manual: Chapter 1 addresses the role of Cavalry in unified land operations and Cavalry organizations. Chapter 2 discusses understanding the threat, potential threat groups and threat characteristics. Chapter 3 addresses the operational environment, shaping, engaging, and influencing outcomes, and consolidating gains. Chapter 4 highlights the updated concepts of mission command in relation to commander's reconnaissance and security guidance, the operations process and information collection. Chapter 5 begins with an overview, followed by a detailed discussion of the fundamentals of reconnaissance, forms of reconnaissance, and reconnaissance handover. Chapter 6 begins with an overview, followed with the fundamentals of security operations, counterreconnaissance, and the forms of security. Chapter 7 provides a short overview and then devotes a section to reconnaissance and security stability planning, stability principles and frameworks, and stability tasks. Chapter 8 describes sustainment for reconnaissance and security tasks, sustainment planning considerations for reconnaissance and security, sustainment considerations for reconnaissance and security and special sustainment consideration. |
| battle damage assessment army: Army Logistician , 1999 The official magazine of United States Army logistics. |
| battle damage assessment army: Professional Journal of the United States Army , 1994 |
THE JOINT STAFF - Joint Chiefs of Staff
Mar 13, 2019 · This instruction establishes the methodology for conducting the three components of Combat Assessment (CA) that may result in a re-attack recommendation (RR): battle damage …
GTA 01-14-001: Battle Damage Assessment & Repair (BDAR) …
GTA 01-14-001: Battle Damage Assessment & Repair (BDAR) Smart Book MEDIA: 58 Page Booklet SYNOPSIS: This GTA provides the procedure used to rapidly return disabled equipment to the...
ART 5.1.4.3.1 Perform Battle Damage Assessment - United …
Provide a timely and accurate estimate of damage resulting from the application of military force, either lethal or nonlethal, against a target. Battle damage assessment provides commanders...
Chapter 1
Battle damage assessment is the estimate of damage composed of physical and functional damage assessment, as well as target system assessment, resulting from the application of lethal or …
FM 3-04.513 - ArmyWriter.com
ATP 3-04.13 describes techniques for conducting and performing battle damage assessment (BDA), repairing, and recovering helicopters and small aircraft in all types of Army operations.
Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair
Tactically, it provides an overview of how recovery and battle damage assessment and repair (BDAR) assets are employed on the battlefield.
TM 5-4120-394-BD TECHNICAL MANUAL BATTLEFIELD …
HOW TO USE THIS MANUAL p you accomplish your mission when your equipment has sustained battlefield damage or is malfunctioning for any other reason during a combat situation. …
Tying It Together: The Battle Damage Assessment Challenge
Batle Damage Assessment: Only One-Third of the Picture. “Combat assessment is composed of three related ele-ments: batle damage assessment, muniions efeciveness assessment, and...
Fusing Data into a Battle Damage Assessment for the …
Jan 31, 2023 · Turning Battle Damage into Combat Assessments for the Commander Outcomes from the BDA and CM WG assist the G-2T analysts with fusing battle damage reports into …
LESS IS MORE: CHANGING THE BATTLE DAMAGE …
Sep 10, 2015 · Battle Damage Assessment Introduction Traditionally, Battle Damage Assessment is an analysis of all-source intelligence data aimed at determination of the level of physical and …
Smart Book - United States Army
Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (BDAR) is the process used to rapidly return disabled equipment to the operational commander by applying field-expedient repairs to damaged …
Combat Assessment Course Syllabus - Joint Chiefs of Staff
Objectives: Summarize the fundamentals of assessing battle damage to the four major LOC system components (highways, airlift, railways, and inland waterways), and emphasize familiarity with …
BATTLEFIELD DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND REPAIR
The purpose of Battlefield Damage Assessment and Repair (BDAR) is to rapidly return disabled generators to the operational commander by expediently fixing, by-passing, or jury-rigging …
Current Procedures for Assessment of BDR in Helicopters - DTIC
This paper will discuss the current US Army Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (BDAR) doctrine, with a review of the purpose and employment of current BDAR by aviation units in the …
Report Date: 552-151A-1012 Conduct Aircraft Battle Damage …
Standards: Conduct Aircraft Battle Damage Assessment, Repair, and/or Recovery by receiving the mission, integrating into a team, planning for aircraft disposition, training, assessing damage,...
Threat and Battlefield Damage Assessment Using 3D Imaging …
This assessment will allow soldiers to identify combat vehicles that have been damaged or destroyed on the battlefield and eventually distinguish civilians from insurgents. The task will be …
Training and Evaluation Outline Report - United States Army
a. Verify preliminary damage assessment of equipment b. Determine BDAR responsibility, based on METT-TC(I) and prior guidance c. Conduct authorized method of battlefield repair d. Determine...
Battle Damage Repair of Tactical Weapons: An Assessment
In this report we describe our findings and conclusions on the U.S. capability to repair battle damaged equipment in the Air Force, Navy, and Army. We focus on the tactical fighter aircraft in …
ART 2.4.3 Provide Intelligence Support to Combat Assessment
The staff determines how combat assessment relates to specific targets by completing battle damage, physical damage, functional damage, and target system assessments.
Training and Evaluation Outline Report - United States Army
a. Conduct a preliminary aircraft damage assessment: Assess system/sub-system or component failure and probable cause. Identify associated risks and determine best course of action (COA) in...
THE JOINT STAFF - Joint Chiefs of Staff
Mar 13, 2019 · This instruction establishes the methodology for conducting the three components of Combat Assessment (CA) that may result in a re-attack recommendation (RR): battle …
GTA 01-14-001: Battle Damage Assessment & Repair (BDAR) …
GTA 01-14-001: Battle Damage Assessment & Repair (BDAR) Smart Book MEDIA: 58 Page Booklet SYNOPSIS: This GTA provides the procedure used to rapidly return disabled …
ART 5.1.4.3.1 Perform Battle Damage Assessment - United …
Provide a timely and accurate estimate of damage resulting from the application of military force, either lethal or nonlethal, against a target. Battle damage assessment provides commanders...
Chapter 1
Battle damage assessment is the estimate of damage composed of physical and functional damage assessment, as well as target system assessment, resulting from the application of …
FM 3-04.513 - ArmyWriter.com
ATP 3-04.13 describes techniques for conducting and performing battle damage assessment (BDA), repairing, and recovering helicopters and small aircraft in all types of Army operations.
Recovery and Battle Damage Assessment and Repair
Tactically, it provides an overview of how recovery and battle damage assessment and repair (BDAR) assets are employed on the battlefield.
TM 5-4120-394-BD TECHNICAL MANUAL BATTLEFIELD …
HOW TO USE THIS MANUAL p you accomplish your mission when your equipment has sustained battlefield damage or is malfunctioning for any other reason during a combat …
Tying It Together: The Battle Damage Assessment Challenge
Batle Damage Assessment: Only One-Third of the Picture. “Combat assessment is composed of three related ele-ments: batle damage assessment, muniions efeciveness assessment, and...
Fusing Data into a Battle Damage Assessment for the …
Jan 31, 2023 · Turning Battle Damage into Combat Assessments for the Commander Outcomes from the BDA and CM WG assist the G-2T analysts with fusing battle damage reports into …
LESS IS MORE: CHANGING THE BATTLE DAMAGE …
Sep 10, 2015 · Battle Damage Assessment Introduction Traditionally, Battle Damage Assessment is an analysis of all-source intelligence data aimed at determination of the level of physical and …
Smart Book - United States Army
Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (BDAR) is the process used to rapidly return disabled equipment to the operational commander by applying field-expedient repairs to damaged …
Combat Assessment Course Syllabus - Joint Chiefs of Staff
Objectives: Summarize the fundamentals of assessing battle damage to the four major LOC system components (highways, airlift, railways, and inland waterways), and emphasize …
BATTLEFIELD DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND REPAIR
The purpose of Battlefield Damage Assessment and Repair (BDAR) is to rapidly return disabled generators to the operational commander by expediently fixing, by-passing, or jury-rigging …
Current Procedures for Assessment of BDR in Helicopters
This paper will discuss the current US Army Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (BDAR) doctrine, with a review of the purpose and employment of current BDAR by aviation units in …
Report Date: 552-151A-1012 Conduct Aircraft Battle Damage …
Standards: Conduct Aircraft Battle Damage Assessment, Repair, and/or Recovery by receiving the mission, integrating into a team, planning for aircraft disposition, training, assessing …
Threat and Battlefield Damage Assessment Using 3D …
This assessment will allow soldiers to identify combat vehicles that have been damaged or destroyed on the battlefield and eventually distinguish civilians from insurgents. The task will …
Training and Evaluation Outline Report - United States Army
a. Verify preliminary damage assessment of equipment b. Determine BDAR responsibility, based on METT-TC(I) and prior guidance c. Conduct authorized method of battlefield repair d. …
Battle Damage Repair of Tactical Weapons: An Assessment
In this report we describe our findings and conclusions on the U.S. capability to repair battle damaged equipment in the Air Force, Navy, and Army. We focus on the tactical fighter aircraft …
ART 2.4.3 Provide Intelligence Support to Combat Assessment
The staff determines how combat assessment relates to specific targets by completing battle damage, physical damage, functional damage, and target system assessments.
Training and Evaluation Outline Report - United States Army
a. Conduct a preliminary aircraft damage assessment: Assess system/sub-system or component failure and probable cause. Identify associated risks and determine best course of action …
