Advertisement
| federal land management agencies: Federal Land Management Agencies Pamela Baldwin, 2005 The federal government owns 655 million acres (29%) of the nearly 2.3 billion acres of land in the United States. Four agencies administer 628 million acres (96%) of this land: the Forest Service in the Department of Agriculture, The Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Park Service, all in the Department of the Interior. The majority of these lands are in the West. They generate revenues for the US Treasury, some of which are shared with states and localities. These agencies receive funding from annual appropriations laws, and from trust funds and special accounts (including the Land and Water Conservation Fund). The lands administered by the four agencies are managed for a variety of purposes, primarily related to conservation, preservation, and development of natural resources. Yet, each of these agencies has distinct responsibilities for the lands and resource it administers. This new book provides an overview of how federal lands and resources are managed, the agencies that manage the lands, the authorities under which these lands are managed, and some of the issues associated with federal land management. The book is divided into nine chapters. In the conclusion of the book, is an appendix of acronyms used in the text, and another defining selected terms used in the report. |
| federal land management agencies: Federal land management Anu K. Mittal, 2012 |
| federal land management agencies: Exploring National Environmental Policy Act Processes Across Federal Land Management Agencies Marc J. Stern, 2010-10 Broad discretion is granted at all levels throughout federal land management agencies regarding compliance with the National Environ. Policy Act (NEPA). The authors explored the diversity of procedures employed in NEPA processes across four agencies, the Forest Service, the Nat. Park Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Army Corps of Eng. There is a lack of consistency not only between, but also within, agencies with regard to how NEPA is implemented. This report focuses on how successful NEPA processes are defined within each agency and what strategies are the most or least beneficial to positive NEPA outcomes. Also identifies unresolved questions about NEPA processes and presents a research strategy for addressing them. |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Land Ownership Congressional Research Congressional Research Service, 2014-12-29 The federal government owns roughly 640 million acres, about 28% of the 2.27 billion acres of land in the United States. Four agencies administer 608.9 million acres of this land: the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and National Park Service (NPS) in the Department of the Interior (DOI), and the Forest Service (FS) in the Department of Agriculture. Most of these lands are in the West and Alaska. In addition, the Department of Defense administers 14.4 million acres in the United States consisting of military bases, training ranges, and more. Numerous other agencies administer the remaining federal acreage. The lands administered by the four land agencies are managed for many purposes, primarily related to preservation, recreation, and development of natural resources. Yet each of these agencies has distinct responsibilities. The BLM manages 247.3 million acres of public land and administers about 700 million acres of federal subsurface mineral estate throughout the nation. The BLM has a multiple-use, sustained-yield mandate that supports a variety of uses and programs, including energy development, recreation, grazing, wild horses and burros, and conservation. The FS manages 192.9 million acres also for multiple uses and sustained yields of various products and services, including timber harvesting, recreation, grazing, watershed protection, and fish and wildlife habitats. Most of the FS lands are designated national forests. Wildfire protection is increasingly important for both agencies. The FWS manages 89.1 million acres of the total, primarily to conserve and protect animals and plants. The National Wildlife Refuge System includes wildlife refuges, waterfowl production areas, and wildlife coordination units. The NPS manages 79.6 million acres in 401 diverse units to conserve lands and resources and make them available for public use. Activities that harvest or remove resources generally are prohibited. Federal land ownership is concentrated in the West. Specifically, 61.2% of Alaska is federally owned, as is 46.9% of the 11 coterminous western states. By contrast, the federal government owns 4.0% of lands in the other states. This western concentration has contributed to a higher degree of controversy over land ownership and use in that part of the country. Throughout America's history, federal land laws have reflected two visions: keeping some lands in federal ownership while disposing of others. From the earliest days, there has been conflict between these two visions. During the 19th century, many laws encouraged settlement of the West through federal land disposal. Mostly in the 20th century, emphasis shifted to retention of federal lands. Congress has provided varying land acquisition and disposal authorities to the agencies, ranging from restricted to broad. As a result of acquisitions and disposals, federal land ownership by the five agencies has declined by 23.5 million acres since 1990, from 646.9 million acres to 623.3 million acres. Much of the decline is attributable to BLM land disposals in Alaska and also reductions in DOD land. Numerous issues affecting federal land management are before Congress. They include the extent of federal ownership, and whether to decrease, maintain, or increase the amount of federal holdings; the condition of currently owned federal infrastructure and lands, and the priority of their maintenance versus new acquisitions; the optimal balance between land use and protection, and whether federal lands should be managed primarily to benefit the nation as a whole or instead to benefit the localities and states; and border control on federal lands along the southwest border. |
| federal land management agencies: Land Management Agencies Robert B. Arthur, 1999-10 Federal land management agencies (FLMA) within the Department of the Interior and Agriculture administer revenue-sharing programs to compensate states and counties for the tax-exempt status of federal lands within their boundaries. This report provides information on: the programs that the FLMA's use to compensate states and counties and identify the major differences among these programs; the processes that Calif., Oregon, and Wash. (COW) use to distribute the federal payments to the counties and the major differences among them; and (3) the amount of federal compensation that COW received and distributed to their counties. Charts and Tables. |
| federal land management agencies: Making America's Public Lands Adam M. Sowards, 2022-04-15 Throughout American history, “public lands” have been the subject of controversy, from homesteaders settling the American west to ranchers who use the open range to promote free enterprise, to wilderness activists who see these lands as wild places. This book shows how these controversies intersect with critical issues of American history. |
| federal land management agencies: Downsizing the Federal Government Chris Edwards, 2005-11-25 The federal government is running huge budget deficits, spending too much, and heading toward a financial crisis. Federal spending soared under President George W. Bush, and the costs of programs for the elderly are set to balloon in coming years. Hurricane Katrina has made the federal budget situation even more desperate. In Downsizing the Federal Government Cato Institute budget expert Chris Edwards provides policymakers with solutions to the growing federal budget mess. Edwards identifies more than 100 federal programs that should be terminated, transferred to the states, or privatized in order to balance the budget and save hundreds of billions of dollars. Edwards proposes a balanced reform package of cuts to entitlements, domestic programs, and excess defense spending. He argues that these cuts would not only eliminate the deficit, but also strengthen the economy, enlarge personal freedom, and leave a positive fiscal legacy for the next generation. Downsizing the Federal Government discusses the systematic causes of wasteful spending, and it overflows with examples of federal programs that are obsolete and mismanaged. The book examines the budget process and shows how policymakers act contrary to the interests of average Americans by favoring special interests. |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Lands Jeremy S. Collins, Alexander R. Perog, 2011 Ownership and use of federal lands have stirred controversy for decades. Conflicting public values concerning federal lands raise many questions and issues: how much land the federal government should own, how managers should balance conflicting uses, whether Congress should designate specially protected areas, and when and how agencies should collect and distribute fees for land and resource uses. Congress continues to examines these questions, particularly in assessing the various uses that might be made of the federal lands, through legislative proposals, program oversight, and annual appropriations for the four major federal land management agencies. This book provides an overview of how federal lands and resources are managed, the agencies that administer the lands, and the authorities under which these agencies operate. |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Land Management Samuel T. Prescott, 2003 Federal land ownership and management are of perennial interest to Congress. This book describes the constitutional authority for federal land ownership. It provides the history of federal land acquisition and disposal, and describes the federal land management agency, jurisdictions, based on congressional authorities to reserve or withdraw lands from disposal. Included in the book are also backgrounds on the various agencies that administer and care for the 6.55 million acres of federal land. |
| federal land management agencies: Public Lands Management Improvement Act of 1997 United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Subcommittee on Forests and Public Land Management, 1998 |
| federal land management agencies: The Federal Lands Resources for the Future, Marion Clawson, Burnell Held, 1966 |
| federal land management agencies: Integrated Public Lands Management John B. Loomis, 2002-01-01 Integrated Public Lands Management is the only book that deals with the management procedures of all the primary public land management agencies -- National Forests, Parks, Wildlife Refuges, and the Bureau of Land Management -- in one volume. This book fills the need for a unified treatment of the analytical procedures used by federal land management agencies in planning and managing their diverse lands. The second edition charts the progress these agencies have made toward the management of their lands as ecosystems. It includes new U.S. Forest Service regulations, expanded coverage of Geographic Information Systems, and new legislation on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Wildlife Refuges. |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Lands United States Accounting Office (GAO), 2018-06-16 Federal Lands: Land Management Agencies' Wildfire Suppression Expenditures |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Lands, Adopting a Formal, Risk-based Approach Government Accountability Office, 2017-08-25 Four federal agenciesthe Forest Service in the Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Park Service in the Department of the Interiorare responsible for managing federal lands, enforcing federal laws governing the lands and their resources, and ensuring visitor safety. Illegal activities occurring on these lands have raised concerns that the four agencies are becoming less able to protect our natural and cultural resources and ensure public safety.GAO examined (1) the types of illegal activities occurring on federal lands and the effects of those activities on natural and cultural resources, the public, and agency employees; (2) how the agencies have used their law enforcement resources to respond to these illegal activities; and (3) how the agencies determine their law enforcement resource needs and distribute these resources. GAO reviewed agency documents, interviewed agency officials, and visited or contacted 26 selected agency units. |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Lands United States. Government Accountability Office, Anu K. Mittal, 2010 |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Lands Barry T. Hill, Jim Wells, Jr., 2001-12 This report provides information about the extent to which personal watercraft and snowmobiles are used on federal lands, the process by which decisions about their use are made, and the extent of monitoring being done in areas where their use is allowed. It focuses on the four major federal land management agencies, which manage about 95% of all federal lands: the Bureau of Land Management, the Fish and Wildlife Service, and the National Park Service, all in the Dept. of the Interior; and the Forest Service in the Dept. of Agriculture. Appendix I describes the report's scope and methodology; appendix II contains agency-by-agency responses to the questionnaire. |
| federal land management agencies: Threats, Intimidation and Bullying by Federal Land Managing Agencies United States. Congress. House. Committee on Natural Resources. Subcommittee on Public Lands and Environmental Regulation, 2014 |
| federal land management agencies: Public Lands Management Improvement Act of 1997 United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Subcommittee on Forests and Public Land Management, 1998 |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Land Management United States Government Accountability Office, 2017-09-15 Federal land management : additional documentation of agency experiences with Good Neighbor authority could enhance its future use : report to the Chairman, Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, U.S. Senate. |
| federal land management agencies: Integrated Public Lands Management John B. Loomis, 2002-05-15 Integrated Public Lands Management is the only book that deals with the management procedures of all the primary public land management agencies—National Forests, Parks, Wildlife Refuges, and the Bureau of Land Management—in one volume. This book fills the need for a unified treatment of the analytical procedures used by federal land management agencies in planning and managing their diverse lands. The second edition charts the progress these agencies have made toward the management of their lands as ecosystems. It includes new U.S. Forest Service regulations, expanded coverage of Geographic Information Systems, and new legislation on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Wildlife Refuges. |
| federal land management agencies: America's Public Lands Randall K. Wilson, 2020-02-25 How it is that the United States—the country that cherishes the ideal of private property more than any other in the world—has chosen to set aside nearly one-third of its land area as public lands? Now in a fully revised and updated edition covering the first years of the Trump administration, Randall Wilson considers this intriguing question, tracing the often-forgotten ideas of nature that have shaped the evolution of America’s public land system. The result is a fresh and probing account of the most pressing policy and management challenges facing national parks, forests, rangelands, and wildlife refuges today. The author explores the dramatic story of the origins of the public domain, including the century-long effort to sell off land and the subsequent emergence of a national conservation ideal. Arguing that we cannot fully understand one type of public land without understanding its relation to the rest of the system, he provides in-depth accounts of the different types of public lands. With chapters on national parks, national forests, wildlife refuges, Bureau of Land Management lands, and wilderness areas, Wilson examines key turning points and major policy debates for each land type, including recent Trump Administration efforts to roll back environmental protections. He considers debates ranging from national monument designations and bison management to gas and oil drilling, wildfire policy, the bark beetle epidemic, and the future of roadless and wilderness conservation areas. His comprehensive overview offers a chance to rethink our relationship with America’s public lands, including what it says about the way we relate to, and value, nature in the United States. |
| federal land management agencies: The Environmental Politics and Policy of Western Public Lands Erika Allen Wolters, Brent Steel, 2020 The management of public lands in the West is a matter of long-standing and oft-contentious debates. The government must balance the interests of a variety of stakeholders, including extractive industries like oil and timber; farmers, ranchers, and fishers; Native Americans; tourists; and environmentalists. Local, state, and government policies and approaches change according to the vagaries of scientific knowledge, the American and global economies, and political administrations. Occasionally, debates over public land usage erupt into major incidents, as with the armed occupation of Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in 2016. While a number of scholars work on the politics and policy of public land management, there has been no central book on the topic since the publication of Charles Davis's Western Public Lands and Environmental Politics (Westview, 2001). In The Environmental Politics and Policy of Western Public Lands, Erika Allen Wolters and Brent Steel have assembled a stellar cast of scholars to consider long-standing issues and topics such as endangered species, land use, and water management while addressing more recent challenges to western public lands like renewable energy siting, fracking, Native American sovereignty, and land use rebellions. Chapters also address the impact of climate change on policy dimensions and scope. The Environmental Politics and Policy of Western Public Lands is co-published with Oregon State University Open Educational Resources, who will release an open access edition alongside this print edition-- |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Land Management: Availability and Potential Reliability of Selected Data Elements at Five Agencies , |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Lands U S Government Accountability Office (G, U. S. Government Accountability Office (, 2013-06 The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is an independent agency that works for Congress. The GAO watches over Congress, and investigates how the federal government spends taxpayers dollars. The Comptroller General of the United States is the leader of the GAO, and is appointed to a 15-year term by the U.S. President. The GAO wants to support Congress, while at the same time doing right by the citizens of the United States. They audit, investigate, perform analyses, issue legal decisions and report anything that the government is doing. This is one of their reports. |
| federal land management agencies: Invasive Species in Forests and Rangelands of the United States Therese M. Poland, Toral Patel-Weynand, Deborah M. Finch, Chelcy Ford Miniat, Deborah C. Hayes, Vanessa M. Lopez, 2021-02-01 This open access book describes the serious threat of invasive species to native ecosystems. Invasive species have caused and will continue to cause enormous ecological and economic damage with ever increasing world trade. This multi-disciplinary book, written by over 100 national experts, presents the latest research on a wide range of natural science and social science fields that explore the ecology, impacts, and practical tools for management of invasive species. It covers species of all taxonomic groups from insects and pathogens, to plants, vertebrates, and aquatic organisms that impact a diversity of habitats in forests, rangelands and grasslands of the United States. It is well-illustrated, provides summaries of the most important invasive species and issues impacting all regions of the country, and includes a comprehensive primary reference list for each topic. This scientific synthesis provides the cultural, economic, scientific and social context for addressing environmental challenges posed by invasive species and will be a valuable resource for scholars, policy makers, natural resource managers and practitioners. |
| federal land management agencies: Sustainable Ecological Systems W. Wallace Covington, 1994 This conference brought together scientists and managers from federal, state, and local agencies, along with private-sector interests, to examine key concepts involving sustainable ecological systems, and ways in which to apply these concepts to ecosystem management. Session topics were: ecological consequences of land and water use changes, biology of rare and declining species and habitats, conservation biology and restoration ecology, developing and applying ecological theory to management of ecological systems and forest health, and sustainable ecosystems to respond to human needs. A plenary session established the philosophical and historical contexts for ecosystem management.--Title page verso. |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Public Land and Resources Law George Cameron Coggins, Charles F. Wilkinson, 1984-09 |
| federal land management agencies: This Land Christopher Ketcham, 2019 The public lands of the western United States comprise some 450 million acres of grassland, steppe land, canyons, forests, and mountains. It's an American commons, and it is under assault as never before. Journalist Christopher Ketcham has been documenting the confluence of commercial exploitation and governmental misconduct in this region for over a decade. His revelatory book takes the reader on a journey across these last wild places, to see how capitalism is killing our great commons. Ketcham begins in Utah, revealing the environmental destruction caused by unregulated public lands livestock grazing, and exposing rampant malfeasance in the federal land management agencies, who have been compromised by the profit-driven livestock and energy interests they are supposed to regulate. He then turns to the broad effects of those corrupt politics on wildlife. He tracks the Department of Interior's failure to implement and enforce the Endangered Species Act--including its stark betrayal of protections for the grizzly bear and the sage grouse--and investigates the destructive behavior of U.S. Wildlife Services in their shocking mass slaughter of animals that threaten the livestock industry. Along the way, Ketcham talks with ecologists, biologists, botanists, former government employees, whistleblowers, grassroots environmentalists and other citizens who are fighting to protect the public domain for future generations. This Land is a colorful muckraking journey--part Edward Abbey, part Upton Sinclair--exposing the rot in American politics that is rapidly leading to the sell-out of our national heritage-- |
| federal land management agencies: Land Management Agencies United States. General Accounting Office, 1998 |
| federal land management agencies: The Western Range Revisited Debra L. Donahue, 1999 Livestock grazing is the most widespread commercial use of federal public lands. The image of a herd grazing on Bureau of Land Management or U.S. Forest Service lands is so traditional that many view this use as central to the history and culture of the West. Yet the grazing program costs far more to administer than it generates in revenues, and grazing affects all other uses of public lands, causing potentially irreversible damage to native wildlife and vegetation. The Western Range Revisited proposes a landscape-level strategy for conserving native biological diversity on federal rangelands, a strategy based chiefly on removing livestock from large tracts of arid BLM lands in ten western states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming. Drawing from range ecology, conservation biology, law, and economics, Debra L. Donahue examines the history of federal grazing policy and the current debate on federal multiple-use, sustained-yield policies and changing priorities for our public lands. Donahue, a lawyer and wildlife biologist, uses existing laws and regulations, historical documents, economic statistics, and current scientific thinking to make a strong case for a land-management strategy that has been, until now, unthinkable. A groundbreaking interdisciplinary work, The Western Range Revisited demonstrates that conserving biodiversity by eliminating or reducing livestock grazing makes economic sense, is ecologically expedient, and can be achieved under current law. |
| federal land management agencies: State Trust Lands Jon A. Souder, Sally K. Fairfax, 1996 An examination of state lands, from a state rather than federal government perspective. This study presents information from 22 US states in its discussion of state trust lands as models of public land administration. |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Lands: Agencies Need to Assess the Impact of Personal Watercraft and Snowmobile Use , 2000 Many of our national parks, forests, wildlife refuges, and other federal lands are a potential source of recreational opportunities for the estimated 14 million adults who used a personal watercraft or snowmobile in 1999. However, the recreational use of these vehicles is often criticized as causing damage to plants, wildlife, and other resources, as well as creating safety problems and conflicts with other visitors to federal lands. Determining the extent to which these vehicles should be allowed to operate on these lands is a contentious and challenging issue faced by federal land managers. Although this issue draws considerable attention, relatively little reliable information has been assembled about the extent to which personal watercraft and snowmobiles are used on federal lands, the process by which decisions about their use are made, or the extent of monitoring being done in areas where their use is allowed. As a result, the General Accounting Office was asked to provide more information on these matters. GAO focused its work on the four major federal land management agencies-the Bureau of Land Management, the Fish and Wildlife Service, and the National Park Service in the Department of the Interior, and the Forest Service in the Department of Agriculture. Collectively, these agencies manage about 95 percent of all federal lands. GAO addressed the following questions: 1) To what extent are personal watercraft and snowmobiles used in federal units managed by these agencies?; 2) What are the bases for agency decisions to authorize or prohibit the use of these vehicles?: 3) In federal units where their use is allowed, do restrictions exist on operations, and how are these restrictions enforced?; and, 4) To what extent have these federal agencies assessed the impact of such use? To respond to these questions, we asked managers from each of nearly 1,200 federal units within the four agencies to answer a questionnaire. |
| federal land management agencies: One Third of the Nation's Land United States. Public Land Law Review Commission, 1970 |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Land Management United States Government Accountability Office, 2018-05-14 FEDERAL LAND MANAGEMENT: Availability and Potential Reliability of Selected Data Elements at Five Agencies |
| federal land management agencies: Staking Out the Terrain Jeanne Nienaber Clarke, Daniel McCool, 1996-07-03 This new edition provides a current and comprehensive analysis of some key federal agencies that manage natural resources: the Army Corps of Engineers, the U. S. Forest Service, the National Park Service, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service), the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Reclamation, and the Bureau of Land Management. Although the book's framework remains unchanged, the chapters have been revised and updated with over 50 percent new material, and more emphasis has been placed on the centrality of the budget process for policymaking. Staking Out the Terrain offers a wealth of historical detail as well as an analysis of current policy conflicts over natural resource management. In addition to examining current trends in water and land management, Clarke and McCool put forward an innovative proposal to reshape federal natural resource administration for the twenty-first century. |
| federal land management agencies: Federal Land Management United States Government Accountability Office, 2017-09-07 The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in the Department of the Interior (Interior) and the Forest Service in the Department of Agriculture (USDA) manage millions of acres of public land. To enhance land management and fulfill other public objectives, they acquire and dispose of land using exchanges-trading federal lands for lands owned by willing private entities, individuals, or state or local governments. GAO and others have raised concerns about whether the public interest has always been served in these land exchanges. GAO was asked to (1) analyze the number, trends, and characteristics of BLM and Forest Service land exchanges and (2) determine the effectiveness of agency actions to address previously identified key problems. GAO interviewed and surveyed agency officials, analyzed agency data on recent exchanges, and reviewed documents on a nongeneralizable sample of 31 land exchanges representing at least 85 percent of the acres that agencies acquired, or plan to acquire, during the time of GAO's review. GAO is making recommendations to, among other things, strengthen |
| federal land management agencies: American Indians and National Forests Theodore Catton, 2016-05-12 American Indians and National Forests tells the story of how the U.S. Forest Service and tribal nations dealt with sweeping changes in forest use, ownership, and management over the last century and a half. Indians and U.S. foresters came together over a shared conservation ethic on many cooperative endeavors; yet, they often clashed over how the nation’s forests ought to be valued and cared for on matters ranging from huckleberry picking and vision quests to road building and recreation development. Marginalized in American society and long denied a seat at the table of public land stewardship, American Indian tribes have at last taken their rightful place and are making themselves heard. Weighing indigenous perspectives on the environment is an emerging trend in public land management in the United States and around the world. The Forest Service has been a strong partner in that movement over the past quarter century. |
| federal land management agencies: Threats, Intimidation and Bullying by Federal Land Managing Agencies, Part II, Oversight Hrg. 113-82, July 24, 2014, 113-2 , 2015 |
| federal land management agencies: Hardrock Mining on Federal Lands National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources, Board on Earth Sciences and Resources, Committee on Hardrock Mining on Federal Lands, 1999-11-03 This book, the result of a congressionally mandated study, examines the adequacy of the regulatory framework for mining of hardrock mineralsâ€such as gold, silver, copper, and uraniumâ€on over 350 million acres of federal lands in the western United States. These lands are managed by two agenciesâ€the Bureau of Land Management in the Department of the Interior, and the Forest Service in the Department of Agriculture. The committee concludes that the complex network of state and federal laws that regulate hardrock mining on federal lands is generally effective in providing environmental protection, but improvements are needed in the way the laws are implemented and some regulatory gaps need to be addressed. The book makes specific recommendations for improvement, including: The development of an enhanced information management system and a more efficient process to review new mining proposals and issue permits. Changes to regulations that would require all mining operations, other than casual use activities that negligibly disturb the environment, to provide financial assurances for eventual site cleanup. Changes to regulations that would require all mining and milling operations (other than casual use) to submit operating plans in advance. |
| federal land management agencies: Standard Specifications for Construction of Roads and Bridges on Federal Highway Projects United States. Federal Highway Administration, 1985 |
City Federal Credit Union
City Federal Credit Union for banking, lending, ATM and credit cards. Mobile app, auto loans, home equity, checking. Membership available to …
Online Privacy Policy - City Federal Credit Union
To learn what City Federal Credit Union does with your personal information please view our Privacy Notice and Privacy Policy or contact us by mail, phone, or email.
Products/Services - City Federal Credit Union
Products & Services. ACH & Direct Deposit Certificates of Deposit (CD) Checking Accounts Direct Deposit Drive Through Lanes With Extended Hours …
Home Banking Questions - City Federal Credit Union
City Federal Credit Union Home Banking Questions and Answers Q: What is Home Banking? A: Home Banking allows you to view your account from the comfort of your home. You can make …
Contact Us - City Federal Credit Union
Main Office Number: (806)373-4313. 24/7 Debit Card Line: (888)263-3370. Lincoln Lobby Hours. M-F 9:00 a.m.— 5:30 p.m. Lincoln Drive-Thru Hours M-Th 9:00 a.m.— 5:30 p.m.
City Federal Credit Union
City Federal Credit Union for banking, lending, ATM and credit cards. Mobile app, auto loans, home equity, checking. Membership available to all. Banking in Amarillo.
Online Privacy Policy - City Federal Credit Union
To learn what City Federal Credit Union does with your personal information please view our Privacy Notice and Privacy Policy or contact us by mail, phone, or email.
Products/Services - City Federal Credit Union
Products & Services. ACH & Direct Deposit Certificates of Deposit (CD) Checking Accounts Direct Deposit Drive Through Lanes With Extended Hours E Statements
Home Banking Questions - City Federal Credit Union
City Federal Credit Union Home Banking Questions and Answers Q: What is Home Banking? A: Home Banking allows you to view your account from the comfort of your home. You can make …
Contact Us - City Federal Credit Union
Main Office Number: (806)373-4313. 24/7 Debit Card Line: (888)263-3370. Lincoln Lobby Hours. M-F 9:00 a.m.— 5:30 p.m. Lincoln Drive-Thru Hours M-Th 9:00 a.m.— 5:30 p.m.
Who We Are - City Federal Credit Union
City Federal Credit Union is privileged to have the leadership of its Board of Directors. The Board is composed of volunteers who have oversight of the credit union. The Credit Union's Board of …
Online Privacy Policy
City Federal Credit Union is owned by its members and run by a board of directors you elect. You can be confident that your financial privacy is a top priority of this credit union. We give you …
About Us - City Federal Credit Union
“City Federal Credit Union is committed to exceed our members expectations to meet their financial happiness, while providing a heartfelt and long-lasting relationship.” Community …
City FCU Mobile App - City Federal Credit Union
City Federal Credit Union does not endorse or guarantee 3rd party links. The products and services offered on 3rd party sites are not products of City FCU. City FCU cannot attest to the …
Welcome [www.cityfederalcu.com]
People's Federal Credit Union Potter-Randall Appraisal District Amarillo Chamber Of Commerce (Employees) North Heights Linen Service. Street Volkswagen. Eastern Point Trust Company. …
